- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jim Jordan says Congress is preparing to pass legislation that will limit injunctions
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:49 am to kbro
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:49 am to kbro
quote:
Oh no Tammi and Derek from Lake Charles!
Absolutely NO way your divorce documents are getting submitted this afternoon.
Slo gonna be busy.
0
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:55 am to John Barron
Is he gonna write a stern letter
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Federal judges have been removed from office exactly fifteen (15) times in the entire history of the USA. There have been about 10,000 federal judges in that time frame.
What does that tell you about their job security?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:02 pm to John Barron
A district judge in Minnesota will rule that Congress doesn’t have the authority to usurp the power of the Article III courts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:06 pm to Flats
quote:That the Founders' intent to remove the Judiciary from political patronage and reprisal seems to have worked.quote:What does that tell you about their job security?
Federal judges have been removed from office exactly fifteen (15) times in the entire history of the USA. There have been about 10,000 federal judges in that time frame.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
That the Founders' intent to remove the Judiciary from political patronage
Yep, no evil, bad political influences even touch these guys in their holy robes.
What the policy has worked to produce is a judiciary who isn't a bit concerned about their professional behavior, and they probably don't give a shite about their personal lives either.
Sure, that's healthy.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:15 pm to John Barron
Congress has the power to change the federal rules of civil procedure
but i am not sure how this works.
If get an injunction ruled against you, just moving a district over is enough to avoid it?
on a smaller level, let’s say you’re in federal court over some contract dispute and a judge orders you not to liquidate your accounts… can you drive to the next state and liquidate your accounts?
Do you need to sue national companies in every district?
but i am not sure how this works.
If get an injunction ruled against you, just moving a district over is enough to avoid it?
on a smaller level, let’s say you’re in federal court over some contract dispute and a judge orders you not to liquidate your accounts… can you drive to the next state and liquidate your accounts?
Do you need to sue national companies in every district?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:20 pm to John Barron
Pipe dream. Will never get the votes in the Senate.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The GOP isn't giving up nationwide injunctions to use against the next DEM President
If we are comparing Injunctions - Do you think it's the GOP that has weaponized nationwide injunctions?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:43 pm to Flats
quote:The Founders obviously considered this possibility, weighed the options, and decided that lifetime tenure was the best option.quote:Yep, no evil, bad political influences even touch these guys in their holy robes.
the Founders' intent to remove the Judiciary from political patronage and reprisal seems to have worked.
They also provided us with the Amendment process, to address the problem, if it were to become a problem.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:46 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
If we are comparing Injunctions - Do you think it's the GOP that has weaponized nationwide injunctions?
I didn't say that. I said they're not giving them up.
Could you imagine what would have happened if the vax mandate wasn't enjoined?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:48 pm to John Barron
As I’ve said many times before, judges on all levels, have way too much power.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:49 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Hopefully this instills more of a sense of urgency for our Chief Justice to get his house in order.
Seemingly, if you’re entire agenda lies in the judiciary’s hands, picking a constitutional fight will help. Art of the Deal. Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:34 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The Founders obviously considered this possibility, weighed the options, and decided that lifetime tenure was the best option.
It may have been, back when judges were cut from a better cloth.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:37 pm to John Barron
Ah yes, let's just dismantle the system of checks and balances. This is totally not an authoritarian move at all.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:49 pm to John Barron
Hmmmmm.... let's see how those uniparty, Mike Johnson, dickless, sellouts vote.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:51 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Several reasonable proposals have been floating around for decades.
It will be interesting to see whether this proposed legislation incorporates one or more of those or whether it will just be some silly red meat for the Populists
Lol.... go back under your rock, you Marxist scum.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:39 pm to Raz
Really? Which ones and for what behavior?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News