- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jim Caviezel wants you to stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein
Posted on 7/13/23 at 4:57 pm to Houag80
Posted on 7/13/23 at 4:57 pm to Houag80
quote:
I did that to mock you.
Shitstain
Vice is full of shite content.
Vice also has rare morsels of legit content.
Vice - the Death of a Billion Dollar Company goes into this a great deal.
I mean who didn't like the early Vice video series? Like when Shane Smith went to NK?
0
Posted on 7/13/23 at 4:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
These people are air tight and being protected. 2 people were not involved in Epstein’s bullshite enterprises. I agree it’s hard to prove, but you know there were more. That doesn’t mean we don’t try.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 4:58 pm to Madking
quote:
All you’re saying here is that you willfully cited a biased and dishonest source
Any source I post looking into the puffery of Ballard's organization will be met with the same response.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 4:59 pm to Timeoday
quote:
WHY NONE of Epstein clients who abused so many of Epstein's trafficked girls have been arrested.
Too many special elections would have to be held and Hollywood would be practically deserted.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
I don’t care about Vice. I want someone to step up and expose these people. People know and we all are aware of that. They are being protected because they are powerful. We don’t stop till they go down. Ever
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:02 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
It appears jessecraig is the latest Groomer apologist on the PT forum, checked his short post history, I think he's all in on Fundamental Transformation.
Wonder what his real username is?
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:03 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
I want someone to step up and expose these people.
It's mostly organized crime/warlord elements in poor countries in SE Asia, Eastern Europe, and Africa.
Central America isn't even a major player yet, but it's the same thing.
We know who is doing it, in terms of international trafficking. Identifying the general characteristics is easy. Teh hard part is doing something about it (see: The War on Drugs, where we faced the same issues).
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
All I care about is the truth, period. No more bullshite. If we can’t agree child sex trafficking is a problem and address it then we have no starting point. It’s time to get to work.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:06 pm to Zap Rowsdower
quote:
quote:
your thread title does not match the video clip at all.
-----
Exactly. I mean from what we hear it’s completely up to interpretation from the listener what he meant by “oh. That’s what we’re up against.” or whatever, but to say he wants people to stop talking about Epstein Island because of what he said in that clip is fricking ridiculous.
Glad I'm not the only one confused by the title. Dunno what the point of the thread is - other than to highlight the movie (which I applaud) and to remind people of Epstein (which I also applaud)
Title of thread sucks tho.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
hard part is doing something about it
wouldn't be so hard if they didn't care about protecting some hi-up officials.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:08 pm to jessecraig
You must have included the wrong link. The video in the link you have in your post doesn't show Caviezal indicating a desire for people to stop talking about Epstein.
He is talking about the fact that in Vegas during 5 different screenings (during the screening) in the same spot of the movie people started talking about something.
When he asked the audience what was causing the discussion they said "Epstein's Island" as in that point in the movie either made them think of Epstein's Island or perhaps showed the island. He was using "up against" as in good (exposing groomers & pedos) vs evil (Epstien's Island).
Definitely not saying people shouldn't talk about it.
He is talking about the fact that in Vegas during 5 different screenings (during the screening) in the same spot of the movie people started talking about something.
When he asked the audience what was causing the discussion they said "Epstein's Island" as in that point in the movie either made them think of Epstein's Island or perhaps showed the island. He was using "up against" as in good (exposing groomers & pedos) vs evil (Epstien's Island).
Definitely not saying people shouldn't talk about it.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why would there be any kind of backlash on a movie like this no matter if it is completely true or even a little bit true and a little bit dramatized?
It isn't a huge issue for me since I don't have any kids, but it would seem to me that people would think it is a good thing to try and bring light to a possible bad situation.
I don't understand why the left is seemingly supportive of child molestation with their behavior.
It isn't a huge issue for me since I don't have any kids, but it would seem to me that people would think it is a good thing to try and bring light to a possible bad situation.
I don't understand why the left is seemingly supportive of child molestation with their behavior.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
I presume you would be talking about this article from Vice LINK, which claims the organization exaggerates its accomplishments. (It also does the Q connecting, drag queen connecting, Beck connecting, and other type partisan whistling). Nevertheless, it doesn’t seem to try to debunk the facts underlying Sound of Freedom. Indeed most of the more even handed criticisms are just based on OUR taking credit for “Liliana”
Apparently there were then and now cards in the original edit, those were cut for time. Based on the popularity of the film, there could be a Directors Cut which would restore those items
As was discussed in the other thread, if you have s beef with the Church of the Latter Day Saints, OUR is probably not your charity. Nevertheless, I haven’t seen anyone state the movie events aren’t based on a true story. Obviously, it’s not a straight documentary but an action thriller. I read where the documentary on the same events is scheduled to be released
Which material items do you allege are untrue?
Apparently there were then and now cards in the original edit, those were cut for time. Based on the popularity of the film, there could be a Directors Cut which would restore those items
As was discussed in the other thread, if you have s beef with the Church of the Latter Day Saints, OUR is probably not your charity. Nevertheless, I haven’t seen anyone state the movie events aren’t based on a true story. Obviously, it’s not a straight documentary but an action thriller. I read where the documentary on the same events is scheduled to be released
Which material items do you allege are untrue?
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:13 pm to Madking
quote:
Now you’re citing Vice. This topic has broken you, you’re left of Jane Fonda all of the sudden.
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:14 pm to jessecraig
quote:
Focus on a fictional story of child sex abuse, not the real sex abuse perpetrated by Jeffrey Epstein
You get this from that?
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:16 pm to bigDgator
quote:
Why would there be any kind of backlash on a movie like this no matter if it is completely true or even a little bit true and a little bit dramatized?
Kind of like when this board melts over some flaming liberal making a movie, solely for the political beliefs.
quote:
I don't understand why the left is seemingly supportive of child molestation with their behavior.
And now you've revealed your dishonesty
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
No
Ballard is not above legitimate criticism respectfully presented. However, he should be afforded enough respect that tangential attacks do not diminish his actual deeds or the importance of the issues he is combatting. Link your sources, just don’t be upset or retreat into argument mode if some one discussed their scope or veracity
Indeed, what you claim others are doing to John Robert’s ( which I am ignorant of) seems to be exactly what you are doing to Ballard
Ballard is not above legitimate criticism respectfully presented. However, he should be afforded enough respect that tangential attacks do not diminish his actual deeds or the importance of the issues he is combatting. Link your sources, just don’t be upset or retreat into argument mode if some one discussed their scope or veracity
Indeed, what you claim others are doing to John Robert’s ( which I am ignorant of) seems to be exactly what you are doing to Ballard
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:25 pm to Houag80
quote:
Shitstain
The “Q-Anon Adjacent” thread should be bumped every time you see SFP start spewing his disingenuous sh* +.
MASH HERE To See A Human Colostomy Bag Lose It’s sH*+….
This post was edited on 7/13/23 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 7/13/23 at 5:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But have fun making a joke of a terrible situation to try to score internet points
SFP treating a child sex trafficking thread as a joke
Posted on 7/13/23 at 6:08 pm to jessecraig
Epstein didn't do anything, there were apparently no customers to traffic young girls to
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News