
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jeff Landry moves to take over New Orleans homeless services
Posted on 8/7/26 at 4:56 pm to 4cubbies
Posted on 8/7/26 at 4:56 pm to 4cubbies
Matthew 25:40
Read it.
It is a matter of personal choice.
I choose to help those in need (food banks, food boxes, clothing boxes, mental health assistance) AND donate to my church.
The government assisting someone temporarily is one thing.
Providing them with a home is not temporary.
Your Section 8 mindset harms society.
Read it.
It is a matter of personal choice.
I choose to help those in need (food banks, food boxes, clothing boxes, mental health assistance) AND donate to my church.
The government assisting someone temporarily is one thing.
Providing them with a home is not temporary.
Your Section 8 mindset harms society.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 4:59 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
That’s not really the question. We lump many societal ills into “homelessness.” It's way more complicated than someone simply not having a place to sleep.
The questions are:
What do we do about the mentally ill when they refuse treatment?
What do we do about drug addicts who refuse treatment?
What do we do about people coming out of incarceration without friends or family to stay with?
What do we do about veterans who have been broken by their service and struggle when they return to society?
Fair point (although I wish you would also look to the other questions I asked), but can you share your thoughts on the four questions you posed?
I'm particularly interested in your answer to the first two as I get the impression that untreated drug addiction and mental illness are at the root of what most people consider the homeless "problem."
Posted on 8/7/26 at 5:27 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Did she belittle homeless people while depending on others to pay for her housing? If she did, that's mighty hypocritical.
Marriages of coequals don’t quibble about who provided or depends on who for what needs. You seem to think financial is the only way to contribute to a household or have opinions on societal derelicts.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 5:32 pm to Harvey Vortac
quote:
You seem to think financial is the only way to contribute to a household or have opinions on societal derelicts.
No, I think that someone who only has housing because another adult provides it for her isn’t in a position to criticize people who don’t have housing because other adults don’t provide it for them.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 5:40 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
No, I think that someone who only has housing because another adult provides it for her isn’t in a position to criticize people who don’t have housing because other adults don’t provide it for them
You paint with a very broad brush and seem to assume that a stay at home mom/wife is incapable of finding housing without being married or having a parent provide for them.
I am reminded of something Mark Twain said to paraphrase “never argue with a fool a passer by may may not be able to tell who is who”
Posted on 8/7/26 at 5:43 pm to Harvey Vortac
You’re inserting a lot of emotion and assumptions into my factual, objective statement. You don’t have to justify why it’s diffe(R)ent for some people to benefit from free housing and immoral for others who haven’t been able to secure free housing. It has nothing to do with marriage or chores or anything else.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 6:12 pm to Red Stick Rambler
quote:
I'm particularly interested in your answer to the first two as I get the impression that untreated drug addiction and mental illness are at the root of what most people consider the homeless "problem."
I will not act as though I have a solution or can come up with a realistic, viable solution at this moment.
I've seen Permanent Supportive Housing be successful. Of course, I have an extremely limited, niche familiarity with homelessness. Basically every homeless person I interact with regularly are coming out of incarceration. There are two individuals that I've gotten to know fairly well. One has mental illness. He was placed in Permanent Supportive Housing. Someone checks on him and ensures he takes his medication. He is able to hold down a job and contribute to society in meaningful ways.
The other homeless person I know is a drug addict in recovery. He has been "traveling" for about 15 years. He is clean and actually converted to Catholicism recently. He's surprisingly and refreshingly wholesome (especially for someone with face tattoos). He stays in shelters in the city. I actually asked him yesterday if he views New Orleans as home and he said he plans to leave when he gets off paper. He has a legal side hustle that he earns some money through. He doesn't panhandle or bother people. I don't think there really is anything to solve for his situation.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 6:16 pm to Red Stick Rambler
quote:
What is society's obligations to the homeless who are on the streets because of their own bad choices, the most obvious being drug addiction?
This depends on if you think human dignity is conditional or intrinsic. What is your take?
quote:
What rights do other members of society have to not be forced to live with the consequences of homelessness?
Consequences of homelessness is interesting phrasing. Can specify which consequences?
Posted on 8/7/26 at 9:52 pm to Red Stick Rambler
quote:
Red Stick Rambler
This very well may dissuade you from sharing it but I would genuinely enjoy reading your take on dignity and whether it is conditional/earned or intrinsic.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 10:14 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
This depends on if you think human dignity is conditional or intrinsic.
It is conditional.
It is also self inflicted.
They abandoned dignity.
I still say that they’re deserving of assistance if in need.
Providing them with a home though…no.
Section 8 is simply a pathogen for criminality.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 7:52 am to 4cubbies
quote:
This depends on if you think human dignity is conditional or intrinsic. What is your take?
When I was younger and more idealistic I would have said it is intrinsic, but I’ve seen too many people forfeit their own dignity to speak in absolutes. I’m just not sure “intrinsic” and “conditional” are the only options - or even the correct options - to be asking about, but the fact that you simplify the problem down to a simplistic binary choice says a lot.
quote:
Consequences of homelessness is interesting phrasing. Can specify which consequences?
Now you're just being intentionally obtuse - people living on the street in public spaces doesn’t just impact the homeless person. The more jarring examples are human waste and drug paraphanalia in sidewalks, having to step over zombified people sprawled out in the doorway to a public building and being screamed at by a mentally ill person. Then there’s the inevitable crime that follows all of this.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:04 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
It is conditional.
On what? Who decides when those conditions have been met? What exactly must a human being do before he ceases to possess human dignity?
quote:
It is also self inflicted.
Then why are unborn babies worthy of protection? They haven’t acted in any ways to earn dignity.
How can you call yourself Catholic and make claims about praying the rosary and attending mass while espousing these beliefs? They are antithetical to foundational Catholic doctrine.
Of course one doesn’t have to be Catholic to understand humans possess unconditional intrinsic worth. Immanuel Kant was not Catholic.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:09 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
If approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development
aint no if, it'll definitely get appoved since Landry is so close with Trump, im sure Nola will sure in some obscure court where a Biden/Obama judge will try and stop it though.... way too much skimming going on to let this get out of their hands.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:20 am to 4cubbies
quote:
On what?
Them foregoing dignity.
quote:
Who decides when those conditions have been met?
They go.
quote:
What exactly must a human being do before he ceases to possess human dignity?
Refuse to possess it.
quote:
Then why are unborn babies worthy of protection? They haven’t acted in any ways to earn dignity.
Unborn babies don’t have the ability to forego dignity.
It’s disgusting that you would equate the unborn to a homeless person, but you do you.
quote:
How can you call yourself Catholic and make claims about praying the rosary and attending mass while espousing these beliefs? They are antithetical to foundational Catholic doctrine.
How so?
By providing for those in need?
By wishing to protect those yet to be born?
You have a weird interpretation of what it means to be Catholic if you truly believe that those are bad things.
quote:
Of course one doesn’t have to be Catholic to understand humans possess unconditional intrinsic worth.
I didn’t mention worth, I noted dignity (self worth).
You knew that, and still proceeded to lie via omission.
That says a lot about you.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 12:49 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
It’s disgusting that you would equate the unborn to a homeless person, but you do you.
Do you believe God created babies in his image and likeness? At what point did God withdraw his image and likeness from the homeless person? At what point did God say “hey person without shelter - you are no longer human. You no longer count as one of my children.” ?
quote:human dignity is worth. You’re playing semantics games because you realize what you’re claiming is absurd and atheistic.
I didn’t mention worth, I noted dignity (self worth).
quote:you are actually lecturing me about my beliefs after denying the existence of human dignity.
You have a weird interpretation of what it means to be Catholic if you truly believe that those are bad things.
This post was edited on 8/8/26 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 8/8/26 at 1:35 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Do you believe God created babies in his image and likeness? At what point did God withdraw his image and likeness from the homeless person?
Pick your Bible, Cubs.
Some are created for destruction.
This post was edited on 8/8/26 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 8/8/26 at 1:47 pm to Red Stick Rambler
quote:Condescension noted. Unless you’re complimenting my youth?
When I was younger and more idealistic I would have said it is intrinsic
quote:
I’m just not sure “intrinsic” and “conditional” are the only options - or even the correct options - to be asking about, but the fact that you simplify the problem down to a simplistic binary choice says a lot.
What other options would there be? I don’t view human dignity as a problem. Maybe the denial of the existence of human dignity is a problem. Or the problem might be that it’s inconvenient and/or uncomfortable to value the humanity of people with which we disagree, or whose choices or circumstances don’t align with our own. You said my believing people either possess human dignity or they don’t says a lot— what does that say? It reads like an intended jab but I don’t even know what the implied insult would be.
quote:
Now you're just being intentionally obtuse - people living on the street in public spaces doesn’t just impact the homeless person. The more jarring examples are human waste and drug paraphanalia in sidewalks, having to step over zombified people sprawled out in the doorway to a public building and being screamed at by a mentally ill person. Then there’s the inevitable crime that follows all of this.
Not being intentionally obtuse. When I think about the consequences of homelessness, I think about when my kids asked me why people go camping in the city after the saw a bunch of tents under the Claiborne overpass when we were on our way to church years ago. Or when they ask me why someone is sleeping outside on the street.
You’re describing the consequences of mental illness and drug addiction, not homelessness.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 4:41 pm to Speckhunter2012
I can promise you, this is another super fraud system....just like the Minnesota debacle.....and it happens in all blue-run cities! and prolly for red cities too.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 5:47 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You’re describing the consequences of mental illness and drug addiction, not homelessness.
Fair point, but what do you think a ven diagram of drug addiction, mental illness and homelessness would look like?

Popular
Back to top


0








