- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jack Smith says US Presidents HAVE NO 1st Amendment rights to allege election fraud!!
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:38 am
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:38 am
What a clown. So is he saying no one has that right? After all, if a POTUS doesn't, who does? No wonder the moron got that job!!
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
12
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:43 am to Timeoday
quote:
Jack Smith says US Presidents HAVE NO 1st Amendment rights to allege election fraud!!
That is literally not what he said
He said, "We wanted to make clear that this was not about, um, trying to interfere with anyone's first amendment rights" and "fraud is not protected by the first amendment"
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
of course You are the achually meme
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Coming to rescue your hero
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:46 am to SDVTiger
quote:
You are the achually meme
What's your issue with correcting a lie?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:46 am to Gifman
quote:
Coming to rescue your hero
No. Just providing his actual quotes to counter a lie.
What's your issue with correcting a lie?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Funny how Mister Slowdatruthpro selectively decides what is a lie and what is a mistake.
a lie?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:49 am to Jbird
quote:
Funny how Mister Slowdatruthpro selectively decides what is a lie and what is a mistake.
Using credible evidence to support my argument helps, especially in the face of sides without it.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:50 am to SlowFlowPro
Right on cue SFP to the rescue of his lawfare hero Jack Smith
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:50 am to SlowFlowPro
Jack Smith mentioned in thread title = SFP Batsignal
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:50 am to Jbird
quote:
Funny how Mister Slowdatruthpro selectively decides what is a lie and what is a mistake.
He only seeks the truth! For tLeft
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:51 am to Timeoday
Smith: "A statement made with know falsity is not protected by the First Amendment."
ToD: "I have no understanding of the words that Smith just said."
ToD: "I have no understanding of the words that Smith just said."
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:51 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Right on cue SFP to the rescue of his lawfare hero Jack Smith
What's your issue with correcting a lie?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:That isn't my point Mister SlowSelectivePro and your use of words like misremembered versus lie.
Using credible evidence to support my argument helps, especially in the face of sides without it.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:52 am to Timeoday
Thanks for posting this. I knew when I saw that Jack Smith was demanding this be released that it was because he is an arrogant prick and he thinks he takes the High Road.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:53 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Smith: "A statement made with know falsity is not protected by the First Amendment."
What was the known falsity in this instance?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Jack Smith says US Presidents HAVE NO 1st Amendment rights to allege election fraud!!
Hey, Jack what about Stacey Abrams, Hillary Clinton, and several others? Did they have the freedom of speech to talk about so-called stolen election?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:53 am to Timeoday
Next he’s going to educate us that perjury is legal and completely ethical if it means taking down Trump.
Slippery slope.
Slippery slope.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:56 am to Timeoday
Smith said from the beginning that Trump was entitled to believe and express his contention that the election was stolen. The case was about actions he may or may not have engaged in to try and prove the point.
Stop trying to make this case something it is not
Stop trying to make this case something it is not
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:56 am to Timeoday
What a shitty argument to go after a sitting POTUS.
“You can’t knowingly make false statements about a lawful government function. That is fraud”.
That’s his argument. Just a few years after Hillary Clinton said the same statement.
Sounds like something Putin would do.
“You can’t knowingly make false statements about a lawful government function. That is fraud”.
That’s his argument. Just a few years after Hillary Clinton said the same statement.
Sounds like something Putin would do.
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 9:59 am
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News