1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith obtained personal info on 639K Republicans- including red MAGA hat buyers
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
A criminal investigation.
I guess you're rescinding your agreement from earlier now?
What agreement are you referring to? Everything that goes on is first political and then "criminal" Just ain't fun when the rabbit's got the gun. I'm not naive, you aren't either, you just enjoy acting that way.
So your position is Jack Smith did not collect data on republicans that have no bearing on his "Crimnal" investiagation?
I guess you're rescinding your agreement from earlier now?
What agreement are you referring to? Everything that goes on is first political and then "criminal" Just ain't fun when the rabbit's got the gun. I'm not naive, you aren't either, you just enjoy acting that way.
quote:
Grasserly didn't release all the information to answer this question.
He's being deceptive in his releases and has been for some time. He went off the rails with dishonestly framing the cell phone collection efforts
So your position is Jack Smith did not collect data on republicans that have no bearing on his "Crimnal" investiagation?
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 8:32 pm
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:34 pm to cajunangelle
I bought one in 2016. Jack Smith can suck it.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:34 pm to Veritas
quote:
What agreement are you referring to?
quote:
So your position is Jack Smith did not collect data on republicans that have no bearing on his "Crimnal" investiagation?
I never made any such argument. Don't strawman this thread
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Again you are not following.
So your position is that this was purely a criminal investigation and warranted the collection of 600K+ republicans?
So your position is that this was purely a criminal investigation and warranted the collection of 600K+ republicans?
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 8:38 pm
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:39 pm to Jbird
SFP and the legend is his own retard mind, idjets have no clue. Many got courage to fly Trump flags, put up signs after Butler. I know and of people that lost jobs because of Trump political signs. Were shunned.
SFP should wear a red MAGA hat in a democrat town in PA and see if he feels like a third class citizen, suddenly losing his job...
Or gets debanked because of his 75 year old hunting store that sells guns under Biden.
Not everywhere is Louisiana red states.
When the Ds and establishments get powers back we are all fricked, so SFP can go play in a kiddie playground wasting time trolling like a jackass.
SFP should wear a red MAGA hat in a democrat town in PA and see if he feels like a third class citizen, suddenly losing his job...
Or gets debanked because of his 75 year old hunting store that sells guns under Biden.
Not everywhere is Louisiana red states.
When the Ds and establishments get powers back we are all fricked, so SFP can go play in a kiddie playground wasting time trolling like a jackass.
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:39 pm to cajunangelle
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Jack assured the American people under oath he is non partisan....remember?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:42 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Jack assured the American people under oath he is non partisan....remember?
How many Democrats do you think showed up on January 6 to stop the results of the 2020 election from being certified?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I never made any such argument. Don't strawman this thread
So what is your position? Is it ok to collect this data on 600K+ republicans that have no bearing on his "investigation"
Do you think that is ever ok?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:45 pm to cajunangelle
I ultimately paid a few thousand.
Not counting attorney fees etc.
Not counting attorney fees etc.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:46 pm to Veritas
quote:
So what is your position?
This wasn't illegal behavior based on our current legal framework today.
quote:
Is it ok to collect this data on 600K+ republicans that have no bearing on his "investigation"
Do you think that is ever ok?
You're pivoting FAR away from the legality.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:46 pm to Jbird
Class action lawsuit. I'm sure SFP would be happy to represent people that experienced that to collect damages from the government.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:47 pm to VoxDawg
At least I'm on someone's shitelist other than the wifes.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Do you ever drop the schtick?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:50 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Jack assured the American people under oath he is non partisan....remember?
Pepperidge Farm does.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:52 pm to uggabugga
SFP
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:53 pm to Veritas
I think lots of things Jack Smith did should be illegal for ALL police and/or prosecutors to do, but that's not the current state of the law.
Singling out Jack Smith because he legally discovered likely illegal behavior by Trump, and trying to turn it into illegality because it is bad for Trump, is not consistent rhetoric, especially if you aren't against this being universally banned (especially when used against your perceived out groups)
Singling out Jack Smith because he legally discovered likely illegal behavior by Trump, and trying to turn it into illegality because it is bad for Trump, is not consistent rhetoric, especially if you aren't against this being universally banned (especially when used against your perceived out groups)
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:54 pm to Jbird
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
I’ve got to say this, it just ain’t gonna stay in. Here goes; you seem about as bad at lawyering as Owl is at being a campaign consultant.
I may signal only joking, but a little later if so.
I may signal only joking, but a little later if so.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:57 pm to VoxDawg
Yuge trump fan but I don’t buy political gear. Smith needs his personal information shared since he did this.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:58 pm to cajunangelle
Well, I don’t wear red as a general rule, so I’m safe, right?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News