0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith obtained personal info on 639K Republicans- including red MAGA hat buyers
Posted on 10/14/26 at 10:16 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 10/14/26 at 10:16 pm to VoxDawg
My long time friend is a large maker of the hats. Well, her company does the printing onto them, not the actual manufacturing of the hat.
She got the deal thru dealing with Eric and St Judes, for many years.
When anyone orders, her printers are non stop and hats shipped out. Makes a cut per hat.
Shes literally printing $$
Gyess they got her list, or from the republican websites where orders are made
She got the deal thru dealing with Eric and St Judes, for many years.
When anyone orders, her printers are non stop and hats shipped out. Makes a cut per hat.
Shes literally printing $$
Gyess they got her list, or from the republican websites where orders are made
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:35 am to cajunangelle
Mine is an untraceable knockoff from a Vietnamese street vendor.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:05 am to SlowFlowPro
I don’t typically post here but in this instance i must. How can you justify this? Forget the law. Lawyers and judges bend the laws on a daily basis to serve their bullshite. Like that cockoff who doxxed a juror for not going his way. And don’t say he didn’t but he did. He even called on Trump to pardon the murdering woman. Yet Trump couldn’t even if he wanted to. The Lawher is a typical lying lawyer. He knew that….or he is a moron.
You have a “page 2” of this report that justifies making an enemy list like this please show it. At this point you have nothing to show. The Biden administration might be the most corrupt administration I’ve ever seen. While they denied a senile old man falling all over the place and mumbling. Why back up this shite? Constitutional rights only apply to leftists….right?
You have a “page 2” of this report that justifies making an enemy list like this please show it. At this point you have nothing to show. The Biden administration might be the most corrupt administration I’ve ever seen. While they denied a senile old man falling all over the place and mumbling. Why back up this shite? Constitutional rights only apply to leftists….right?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:01 am to VoxDawg
you got him. send him to jail. how many americans did DOGE collect on americans
Posted on 10/15/26 at 5:45 am to Veritas
quote:
Class action lawsuit for illegal data collection
It should be right up there with the litigation against the banks that made the list in the first place.
And then used that list to cancel or limit user accounts.
The major stockholders of those banks being Vanguard and BlackRock, btw.
Edit: I see later on the argument between you and SFP. I posted before reading all of that, so this isn't related to any of it.
But yeah. This list was actually put together and used against customers. Mainly under the Wells Fargo and Visa umbrellas.
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 5:52 am
Posted on 10/15/26 at 5:58 am to 56lsu
quote:
how many americans did DOGE collect on americans
You want to try that again in English this time?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 6:11 am to Rebbedup
quote:
I don’t typically post here but in this instance i must. How can you justify this?
As I said in this very thread
quote:
I think lots of things Jack Smith did should be illegal for ALL police and/or prosecutors to do, but that's not the current state of the law.
Also if you go back in that conversation you'll find a discussion specifically about the legality of the actions, which makes this
quote:
Forget the law.
Impossible to unwind after the fact
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 6:17 am
Posted on 10/15/26 at 7:00 am to SlowFlowPro
I was shocked to read this thread and see that SFP, the libertarian, was defending Jack smith, while refusing to offer an explanation about why the scope of the investigation into Donald Trump stretched out to hundreds of thousands of people who never had anything to do with what trump was being investigated for.
Also note that SFP, the libertarian, suggested that the person who brought this overreach to light was being “deceptive”.
Also note that SFP, the libertarian, suggested that the person who brought this overreach to light was being “deceptive”.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 7:09 am to G2160
quote:
Also note that SFP, the libertarian, suggested that the person who brought this overreach to light was being “deceptive”.
Just save time and call him what he is - a lawyer.
He is not just a liar; he is a trained one. His only goal here is to distract.
I do love the fact that HE CAN NOT STAND that there may be people who come here and have fun ridiculing leftists. He could no more leave here than he could fly. I bet he thinks about this board when he is not posting. What kind of lame arse does that?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 7:21 am to RohanGonzales
For what purpose did Jack Smith need this info? WHY would he need it? WHY would he need Congressmen and Senators call records?
WHY would any judge allow it?
WHY would any judge allow it?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 7:48 am to cajunangelle
quote:
You shouldn't be talking about Vacherie like that. Brilliant, most handsome, stunning, beautiful, humorous, joyful, vivacious, people come from that stock.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 7:52 am to G2160
quote:
I was shocked to read this thread and see that SFP, the libertarian, was defending Jack smith,
Try reading
My actual words:
quote:
I think lots of things Jack Smith did should be illegal for ALL police and/or prosecutors to do, but that's not the current state of the law.
What about the above doesn't fit in with libertarian philosophy?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 7:53 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
HE CAN NOT STAND that there may be people who come here and have fun ridiculing leftists
What silliness
I've been making fun of life this on here for over 20 years straight
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 7:54 am
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
My actual words:
One sentence in a thread in which you, the libertarian, are trying to convince people that what happened was OK.
You do this intentionally to leave yourself wiggle room, but everyone reading this thread sees all of your other posts and knows why you’re here.
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 8:21 am
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:23 am to G2160
quote:
One sentence in a thread in which you, the libertarian, are trying to convince people that what happened was OK.
Another straw man.
I discussed the legality of his actions, not the propriety of his actions.
And when asked about the propriety, I responded with the quoted language.
What do you get out of being dishonest?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 8:49 am to SlowFlowPro
I think you are trying too hard here. You are going to have to justify how dragnetting personal info on hundreds of thousands of random republican voters all over the country falls within the scope, mandate, or appointment order given to him by the Attorney General that he is legally bound by.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 10:12 am to Vacherie Saint
Pos
Posted on 10/15/26 at 11:33 am to uggabugga
it was 300 in the morning and I'm typing from a hospital bed sorry
Posted on 10/15/26 at 11:38 am to cajunangelle
Is today one of the days where we don’t like what grand juries do?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 11:59 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
If you've bought any campaign merchandise, which is considered a campaign contribution, you are on a government list somewhere. That is publicly available information that literally anyone can get a list of that includes names, addresses, total amount contributed, and possibly other information.
Everything sold by Trump, hats to Bibles, was done so through his campaign and any purchases are considered campaign contributions.
This was the gathering of unpublicized, sensitive personal data and consumer transaction histories that went far beyond basic public disclosure.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News