- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith moves to VACATE all remaining deadlines in the DC Trump case
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We will never know because we'll never see the full case and jury determination
Lololololol
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:31 pm to udtiger
quote:
Just remember...DOJ tried to dismiss the Flynn case and Sullivan would not let them. I could absolutely see.this fricking kunt judge doing the same thing
Possible, not probable.
Those people aren't so tough when they stand alone, and she has no more back up.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:33 pm to the808bass
quote:
Lololololol
Have you seen the government's case and Trump's defense presented to a jury to judge?
Do you have one of those Marvel comics devices where you can flip to an alternate reality to see things us over here on this reality aren't privy to viewing?
Or are you just pre-judigng without evidence again?
This post was edited on 11/8/24 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:That is beyond irrelevant. For Trump, the system has demonstrated its visceral jury-judge antipathy to actual innocence. Trust breached is not easily regained. These cases were prima facie bullshite.
Have you seen the government's case and Trump's defense presented to a jury to judge?
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:41 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That is beyond irrelevant.
Viewing the case in chief is irrelevant to judging a case?
quote:
For Trump, the system has demonstrated its visceral jury-judge antipathy
I never said we were bound by the jury's determination alone. I said had we seen the case/defense to judge it ourselves.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
Right on cue there he is just spitting shite out again SFP to the rescue He’s dropping the case cause it’s shite.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:51 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
The lap dance is always better when the stripper is crying.
Great song.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
There was never any merit.
We will never know because we'll never see the full case and jury determination
SFP still believes...
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No.
Viewing the case in chief is irrelevant to judging a case?
In Berian Law, the findings are irrelevant to actual guilt or innocence. If the system you work in is shite, you'd better slather some strong cologne before you step outside to defend it.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:54 pm to LegalEazyE
quote:
SFP still believes
I only said there wasn't a case to judge properly.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No. You said predetermined findings rendered by a bigoted, shite-system were relevant in ascertaining innocence.
I never said we were bound by the jury's determination alone.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 1:02 pm to L.A.
That’s nice. Still, off to the gulag Jack!
Posted on 11/8/24 at 1:10 pm to antibarner
quote:
They raid Trump and put him through a totally political.prosecution run by the worst sort of political prosecutor.,Totally unnecessary.
Also, ask yourself this - all those files are now trumps to do what he wants - even retroactively make them his so there is no case anymore
Posted on 11/8/24 at 1:32 pm to antibarner
quote:
You can't be serious.DOJ lets a son of a bitch off that had docs in his possession from when he was a Senator...for YEARS...that he never had a right to have. He has documents in his freaking garage. and gave access to his ghostwriter to classified material.
What’s the statute of limitations on this? Can Trumps DOJ have him charged now for the same charges Trump got? Seems only fair.
This post was edited on 11/8/24 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 11/8/24 at 1:35 pm to L.A.
We need a special counsel immediately to start investigating Smith and the origins of Documentgate.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 1:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
The only reason this case is going to be dismissed is the DOJ policies at issue. When this story first broke, I said they were doing Trump a solid by doing this before he was actually inaugurated. People got upset at the point and then pulled the "he hasn't been sworn in yet so the DOJ policy doesn't apply" card.
Yep, Jack Smith under the supervision of Merrick Garland spontaneously decided to "do Trump a solid" but were prevented by DOJ policy and norms, which they have definitely rigorously adhered to by, for example, not prosecuting a former president, and not prosecuting a presidential candidate in an election year as a tool to influence the election.
I certainly hope you continue sharing more galaxy-brain takes like this with us at the rate of hundreds of posts a day.
This post was edited on 11/8/24 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 11/8/24 at 1:55 pm to L.A.
He had nothing but continued to presumably stuff his pockets?
Anyone know how much he was paid and from which office?
It had to be a fortune.
Anyone know how much he was paid and from which office?
It had to be a fortune.
Popular
Back to top



1






