re: I'm Curious. How Many Here Think Lee Harvey Oswald Acted Alone in the JFK Assassination?

quote:

---

Murdering a guy in police custody surrounded by press just some wacky impulse lol

---

Transferring Oswald from one jail to another one should've been conducted with the highest level of security. They should've done it at 2 AM with ZERO unauthorized personnel anywhere near that building. But how they actually did it resembled planned chaos.

I guess we were supposed to believe that Ruby just happened to walk in at just the right time to shoot him. One-in-a-million odds on that.

quote:

---

There have been mob guys (dead now) who said on record that it was a joint CIA/Mob effort.



Not exactly.

Not that I could find, anyway (although I am fine standing corrected if you have a link that says otherwise).

---

Dude, I know what I watched. You're free to not believe me just because you never saw anything like this.

quote:

---

At this point, if someone believes Oswald acted alone, they're the crazy conspiracy theorist.

---

Hahaha, I think the evidence points to he did not act alone, but he took the shot alone.

Bolt action rifle. Moving target. Adrenaline pumping situation would have made his hands shake. 3 rounds in 8 seconds with a bolt action rifle. Pristine bullet found in the gurney after supposedly crashing through bone.

Last shot is the kill shot that causes JFK’s body to move in the direction the shot supposedly came from. The kill shot location has a direct line of sight from the fence behind the grassy knoll. And the physics of his body movement match a shot from that direction (not from behind). A watchman saw guys behind the fence behind the grassy knoll and ended up murdered.

The CIA shared an address with a building Oswald was using as his address in New Orleans. Former CIA Director Allen Dulles was a member of the Warren commission. The guy who literally started the CIA and had been fired by JFK.

I can go on and on and on about the anomalies that day.

quote:

---

I guess we were supposed to believe that Ruby just happened to walk in at just the right time to shoot him.

---

But that is what happened.

They have records with time stamps and witnesses to prove it.

quote:

---

You seem to have your mind made up

---

I've literally posted the opposite a few times on this thread. Just because I don't believe YOUR completely uncorroborated and suspect witness doesn't mean I don't believe anything. I just have to have a reason to believe it. I'm not strting with a conclusion and then just believing anything that supports what I want to believe.

quote:

---

Here's an interview with one guy who had ties to both the CIA and the Mob.

---

Again, a quick Google search says pretty much the same thing about this guy. Timeline doesn't line up for him to be in Dallas that day, there is no corroboration other than his own claim that he was connected to the CIA.

He does appear to have been mob-adjacent, however, and it looks like he supplied fake IDs of various kinds to people who did work for the Mafia.

I don't think Oswald acted alone. But the bigger question for me? How much was Lyndon Johnson involved in the assassination of President Kennedy? There's evidence of his involvement in the assassination, but IMO, there is not conclusive evidence. But I do believe he knew the assassination attempt was imminent. FACT - some really dark people swirled around Lyndon Johnson.

Lyndon Johnson was a morally bankrupt man. He enjoyed humiliating people, including Lady Bird and the members of his own cabinet. It is reported he had a habit of hosting his cabinet meetings.........while doing his business on a commode in his toilet. It was his way of taunting people he knew were more intelligent than him. Despicable man.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

quote:

---

nobody who has really looked into his claims believes him

---

Meh.
I don't necessarily 'believe' him. But his account is definitely not unbelievable either.

I put zero credence in FBI/CIA denials though. WTF else would they say?

As far as an invented story is concerned, Files provides a boatload of unnecessarily extraneous information, details which could be tracked and disprove his claims. For example, the details about meeting Oswald before the assassination. I did not know paraffin tests were only positive on LHO's palms. Yet that actually was the finding. I did not know the bullets retrieved from Tippett's body did not match Oswald's pistol. But they didn't. Both of those findings mesh with Files' account, and contradict the official record.

Likewise, Files' description of the assassination site, the tree with the overhanging branch, the mud, location of the street sign and wooden posts, etc. are very detailed. When asked which side of the tree he was on he, hesitated, then mimed as if reliving the event, before saying "left, it must have been the left." The fireball pistol meshes with events also.

You say you've come across information proving Files was elsewhere on November 22nd. I haven't seen that. Though we'll probably not be able to prove Files' account, associated facts could certainly disprove it. If he was definitively not in Dallas at the time, that obviously blows his claims out of the water.

You will get hipster contrarians in here eventually telling you the CIA being involved in anyway is just crazy. CIA is a purely neutral, generally beneficent organization under complete control and oversight by the US government.