- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Biden won 2020 legitimately
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:48 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:48 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:That was always a long shot. The constitution is pretty clear about states having independent authority over their elections. Regardless, SCOTUS heard that case and issued an opinion. That's their job. You may not agree with the opinion, but they did their function. Or would you prefer a more activist court that goes beyond their function and starts determining the validity of elections on their own?
The Supreme Court incredibly ruled that Texas could show no harm by unconstitutionally obtained results in Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, etc. contrary to the interests of Texas et al.
quote:Biden's abdication of immigration law is an entirely separate issue. Congress had the power to stop it. And didn't. Again, this wasn't SCOTUS' job to pre-determine what the consequences of the 2020 election would be.
Millions of illegal immigrants and billions of dollars later, that ruling is obviously comical.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:50 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:How did changing the record of who won those past races change the outcome of today's stage?
Well, let's test that premise. How many Tour de France races did Lance Armstrong win?
I mean... if we hadn't corrected the record Tadej would probably be a shitty rider no one had ever heard of, amiright?
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:51 pm to Taxing Authority
>Pedantic moron misses the big picture ignores obvious anomalies.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:54 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
It should be easy but they trip on their own dicks every time, which is why it keeps getting asked.
Agreed
I've only seen a handful that have had the courage to state the election was stolen.
Rubio has and I believe there's been a few judges.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:56 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
How did changing the record of who won those past races change the outcome of today's stage?
Seriously? As part and parcel of an overall and ongoing effort to avert the same circumstances from coming about in the future, maybe??
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:57 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I wish Trump would work half as hard trying to get stuff done during this current admin as he is trying to win the 2020 election.
Could you imagine any employee in any situation spending a significant effort bitching about something that happened 6 years prior instead of focusing on their job?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:58 pm to Powerman
Seems like he can handle multiple things simultaneously. He is focusing on his job and is able to discuss this and get it back out there as well. Very odd comment from you.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:00 pm to DeBoar
Nah, the real question is why wouldn't they be overly helpful in proving all areas of questionable events.
Like they say, always listen for who cries the most when bad things are questioned.
Now, all they do is scream, when really all they need to do is prove all is well, and the challenges would stop.
Like they say, always listen for who cries the most when bad things are questioned.
Now, all they do is scream, when really all they need to do is prove all is well, and the challenges would stop.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:00 pm to Powerman
quote:
Could you imagine the commander in chief spending a significant effort bitching about a stolen election that happened 6 years prior
quote:
instead of focusing on their job?
His job that requires him to protect the United States from ALL enemies foreign AND domestic?
It’s so easy wrecking your low iq arse.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:00 pm to DeBoar
SAVE ACT will kill this BS for good!
DEMS are shitting the pants right now!
DEMS are shitting the pants right now!
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:01 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
SCOTUS heard that case
No, they didn't, and that is the problem. They refused to hear it.
quote:
Biden's abdication of immigration law is an entirely separate issue
No. It was entirely predictable harm, and as such was at the crux of Texas's concern.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:02 pm to DeBoar
If they didn’t cheat they wouldn’t vehemently defend the mechanisms by which they cheat. Namely, lack of voter ID standards and unfettered mail in ballots.
If two athletes are accused of using PEDs the guy who complains about the drug test is the guys who’s cheating.
End of story. No other confirmation is needed.
If two athletes are accused of using PEDs the guy who complains about the drug test is the guys who’s cheating.
End of story. No other confirmation is needed.
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:03 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
If they didn’t cheat they wouldn’t vehemently defend the mechanisms by which they cheat.
199% it’s the behavior of the guilty.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:03 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:It is a simple yes or no question. Did Lance Armstrong win the Tour de France? Yes or no? The previous poster said it was an "easy answer."
How did changing the record of who won those past races change the outcome of today's stage?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:05 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Certatori is the preliminary "hearing".
No, they didn't, and that is the problem. They refused to hear it.
quote:So in your view the SCOTUS should verify election based on what they expect the outocome of a yet to happen presidency will be? You sure that's what you want? A fortune-teller court? Maybe the next SCOTUS justice should be Miss Cleo?
No. It was entirely predictable harm, and as such was at the crux of Texas's concern.
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:07 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
199% it’s the behavior of the guilty.
And furthermore, their lack of shame in defending obvious cheating, is indicative of just how badly they depend on cheating to even have a chance at the polls.
It’s like “yeah we know it looks bad that we are shamelessly defending obvious cheating but, here’s the deal, we don’t have a fricking choice, because if we lose on voter ID and mail in ballots, and are forced to win a fair election, based on solid policy…we are completely fricked!”
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:09 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:No. It's not. Whether something is worthy of spending massive amounts of political capital on at the expense of the current agenda at hand is the question.
It is a simple yes or no question. Did Lance Armstrong win the Tour de France?
I can argue that Patrick Petersen was inbound all I want. 100% proven he was to anyone with a set of eyeballs. It will not help LSU win any games next season. Do you think Lane Kiffen should be holding team meetings in fall camp about Patrick Peterson, or installing his offense/defense?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:09 pm to DeBoar
Surely, this isn't mean to be an intelligent argument?
I mean, regardless of your feelings on the 2020 election, how could this possibly be a question?
I mean, regardless of your feelings on the 2020 election, how could this possibly be a question?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:09 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
If they didn’t cheat they wouldn’t vehemently defend the mechanisms by which they cheat.
quote:
199% it’s the behavior of the guilty.
quote:
And furthermore, their lack of shame in defending obvious cheating, is indicative of just how badly they depend on cheating to even have a chance at the polls.
It's like you've framed this to where there can't even be a response, and you're doing this without any direct, credible evidence to prove the fraud in 2020 even occurred.
Amazing
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
"Has GA stopped cheating yet?"
Popular
Back to top



2






