Started By
Message

re: If Biden won 2020 legitimately

Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63798 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

The Supreme Court incredibly ruled that Texas could show no harm by unconstitutionally obtained results in Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, etc. contrary to the interests of Texas et al.
That was always a long shot. The constitution is pretty clear about states having independent authority over their elections. Regardless, SCOTUS heard that case and issued an opinion. That's their job. You may not agree with the opinion, but they did their function. Or would you prefer a more activist court that goes beyond their function and starts determining the validity of elections on their own?

quote:

Millions of illegal immigrants and billions of dollars later, that ruling is obviously comical.
Biden's abdication of immigration law is an entirely separate issue. Congress had the power to stop it. And didn't. Again, this wasn't SCOTUS' job to pre-determine what the consequences of the 2020 election would be.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63798 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Well, let's test that premise. How many Tour de France races did Lance Armstrong win?
How did changing the record of who won those past races change the outcome of today's stage?

I mean... if we hadn't corrected the record Tadej would probably be a shitty rider no one had ever heard of, amiright?
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 1:52 pm
Posted by ManBearSharkReb
Member since Dec 2018
7022 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:51 pm to
>Pedantic moron misses the big picture ignores obvious anomalies.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
21100 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

It should be easy but they trip on their own dicks every time, which is why it keeps getting asked.


Agreed

I've only seen a handful that have had the courage to state the election was stolen.

Rubio has and I believe there's been a few judges.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
37188 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

How did changing the record of who won those past races change the outcome of today's stage?

Seriously? As part and parcel of an overall and ongoing effort to avert the same circumstances from coming about in the future, maybe??
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175157 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

I wish Trump would work half as hard trying to get stuff done during this current admin as he is trying to win the 2020 election.

Could you imagine any employee in any situation spending a significant effort bitching about something that happened 6 years prior instead of focusing on their job?
Posted by lsuguy84
Madisonville
Member since Feb 2009
27951 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 1:58 pm to
Seems like he can handle multiple things simultaneously. He is focusing on his job and is able to discuss this and get it back out there as well. Very odd comment from you.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
7296 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:00 pm to
Nah, the real question is why wouldn't they be overly helpful in proving all areas of questionable events.
Like they say, always listen for who cries the most when bad things are questioned.
Now, all they do is scream, when really all they need to do is prove all is well, and the challenges would stop.
Posted by ManBearSharkReb
Member since Dec 2018
7022 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Could you imagine the commander in chief spending a significant effort bitching about a stolen election that happened 6 years prior


quote:

instead of focusing on their job?


His job that requires him to protect the United States from ALL enemies foreign AND domestic?

It’s so easy wrecking your low iq arse.
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
25738 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:00 pm to
SAVE ACT will kill this BS for good!

DEMS are shitting the pants right now!
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140478 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

SCOTUS heard that case

No, they didn't, and that is the problem. They refused to hear it.

quote:

Biden's abdication of immigration law is an entirely separate issue

No. It was entirely predictable harm, and as such was at the crux of Texas's concern.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36639 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:02 pm to
If they didn’t cheat they wouldn’t vehemently defend the mechanisms by which they cheat. Namely, lack of voter ID standards and unfettered mail in ballots.

If two athletes are accused of using PEDs the guy who complains about the drug test is the guys who’s cheating.

End of story. No other confirmation is needed.
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 2:03 pm
Posted by ManBearSharkReb
Member since Dec 2018
7022 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

If they didn’t cheat they wouldn’t vehemently defend the mechanisms by which they cheat.


199% it’s the behavior of the guilty.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140478 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

How did changing the record of who won those past races change the outcome of today's stage?
It is a simple yes or no question. Did Lance Armstrong win the Tour de France? Yes or no? The previous poster said it was an "easy answer."
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63798 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

No, they didn't, and that is the problem. They refused to hear it.
Certatori is the preliminary "hearing".

quote:

No. It was entirely predictable harm, and as such was at the crux of Texas's concern.
So in your view the SCOTUS should verify election based on what they expect the outocome of a yet to happen presidency will be? You sure that's what you want? A fortune-teller court? Maybe the next SCOTUS justice should be Miss Cleo?
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 2:06 pm
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36639 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

199% it’s the behavior of the guilty.


And furthermore, their lack of shame in defending obvious cheating, is indicative of just how badly they depend on cheating to even have a chance at the polls.

It’s like “yeah we know it looks bad that we are shamelessly defending obvious cheating but, here’s the deal, we don’t have a fricking choice, because if we lose on voter ID and mail in ballots, and are forced to win a fair election, based on solid policy…we are completely fricked!”
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63798 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

It is a simple yes or no question. Did Lance Armstrong win the Tour de France?
No. It's not. Whether something is worthy of spending massive amounts of political capital on at the expense of the current agenda at hand is the question.

I can argue that Patrick Petersen was inbound all I want. 100% proven he was to anyone with a set of eyeballs. It will not help LSU win any games next season. Do you think Lane Kiffen should be holding team meetings in fall camp about Patrick Peterson, or installing his offense/defense?
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
17798 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:09 pm to
Surely, this isn't mean to be an intelligent argument?

I mean, regardless of your feelings on the 2020 election, how could this possibly be a question?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
480753 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

If they didn’t cheat they wouldn’t vehemently defend the mechanisms by which they cheat.


quote:

199% it’s the behavior of the guilty.


quote:

And furthermore, their lack of shame in defending obvious cheating, is indicative of just how badly they depend on cheating to even have a chance at the polls.



It's like you've framed this to where there can't even be a response, and you're doing this without any direct, credible evidence to prove the fraud in 2020 even occurred.

Amazing
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63798 posts
Posted on 7/18/26 at 2:11 pm to
"Has GA stopped cheating yet?"
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram