re: If Biden won 2020 legitimately

quote:

---

The lack of evidence IS evidence of the conspiracy quote:And I like how you offered zero reasonable alternatives which would explain their behavior. Which behavior? Making moonbats look like idiots? I did explain that

---

And you double down.

You aren’t helping yourself.

quote:

---

The fact OP thought he had a gotcha when the questions keep getting asked to make muh steal NPCs look like retards and laughing stocks is mind-numbing

---

Ohh ad hom. Yeah that’s always credibility boosting.

quote:

---

Ohh ad hom. Yeah that’s always credibility boosting.

---

I didn't actually use the ad hom

The comment about "muh steal NPCs" was specifically answering the question in OP. That's why they do it. To make those people look bad.

Since that population continues to make allegations without direct, credible evidence and the vast majority of the country has marginalized them, the media continuously asks the question of that population to make them look bad and keep them marginalized.

Their issue is they have no direct, credible evidence (over 6 years later) to respond with, so they typically dodge answering the question (which makes them look worse ,if you could imagine that's possible).

quote:

---

interesting that 6 million + people decided to not vote in 2024

---

Mostly in liberal states that wouldn't have cheated in 2020

quote:

---

Why do the left continue to demand confirmation of such?

---

You mean in Senate confirmation hearings? They want to know whether the nominee is a serious human being, or willing to deny reality for Trump. Also, it's probably fun to torture nominees who know damn well that Trump lost the election, and don't want to perjure themselves, but also know that admitting Trump lost the election will cause Trump to flame out.

quote:

---

Have you missed the last 6 years of people denying the legitimacy?

---

How much of your fortune would you bet that within at least a decade the details of cheat will confirm your rigid stance here?

You are not intellectually stupid - so all I can attribute your steadfast worship of the 2020 election is that you are either a traitor to the USA or that you are just a common crook with respect to politics.

And the side you are defending is racing headlong into communism.

Your only true conviction is hatred of Trump.

I do not like trump's persona - cannot stand a braggart -

BUT I pay daily homage to his alliegence to the USA - and I pray thanks for his elation in 2015 because we'd already be a failed state had he not kept the wicked witch from Arkansas out out go the WH.

I look forward to the commie/democrats proving that the Democrat party only has ONE defining characteristic. === they HATE Donald trump more than any consideration for the good of the nation.

quote:

---

if you could imagine that's possible).

---

Oh I don’t need to imagine since I’m witnessing you repeated dodge the point of my comment to which you responded.

quote:

---

So you think now there is direct credible evidence?

---

Direct credible evidence of what?

Unconstitutional processes?
Absolutely. It is not even debatable.

Foreign interference?
That seems to be a slam dunk too.

Are you denying the 2020 likelihood of:
Mail ballot fraud?
Voting machine issues?

quote:

---

Georgia and Arizona fraud caught and admitted.

---

Nope and nope

quote:

---

That is 100% false.

---

No it's not.

What direct, credible evidence is there of voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election?

There is some witness testimony of alleged fraud that isn't credible

There is a TON of indirect evidence that may or may not be credible (bellwether counties, historical norms, etc.)

There is a TON of indirect evidence that is not credible (Lindell specializes in this and keeps taking L after L)