- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ICEBlock App alerts people if ICE is within 5 miles
Posted on 6/30/25 at 4:42 pm to Azkiger
Posted on 6/30/25 at 4:42 pm to Azkiger
quote:
How can ICE arrest someone who was tipped off and left 5 minutes before they got there?
If ICE wasn’t already there, how would their location be reported on the app?
Posted on 6/30/25 at 4:45 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
If ICE wasn’t already there, how would their location be reported on the app?
Because teleportation technology doesn't exist and you have to physically travel through space in order to get to a location.
While you're in route, someone could ping they saw ICE driving down the street.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 4:55 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Not at all. ICE is still able to arrest anyone they want to.
With people providing cover for illegals.. which is blatant obstruction. Especially when an app was created for just that.
I really should not expect someone who's in a party that can't identify what a woman is to understand this, even as uncomplicated as it is.
You'll be wrong again, and we will be right back here telling you I told you so. You live on the wrong side of every issue.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 5:10 pm to Azkiger
quote:
While you're in route, someone could ping they saw ICE driving down the street.
Just like someone could call or text them and say the same thing.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 5:15 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
We should install it and report false info to the point where it is useless.
This. If you see a construction site or a roofing company with suspected illegals just report ICE in the area and they go running. Every Home Depot can be reported as being watched by ICE. This can easily be used in a negative way to scare off illegals if enough people start scamming it.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 5:16 pm to back9Tiger
quote:
which is blatant obstruction
Why hasn’t the app been taken down in 9 years?
quote:
I really should not expect someone who's in a party that can't identify what a woman is to understand this, even as uncomplicated as it is.
I really should not expect someone who makes baseless accusations and pretends they are facts to have any deference for the Constitution of the United States.
quote:
You'll be wrong again, and we will be right back here telling you I told you so. You live on the wrong side of every issue.
Why hasn’t the app been taken down? Is the gov waiting for you to tip them off about its existence?
Posted on 6/30/25 at 5:36 pm to Azkiger
quote:
You'd have a point if cops radaring were attempting to serve arrest warrants
And there it is. So easy to understand the difference.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 6:08 pm to Azkiger
quote:
You'd have a point if cops radaring were attempting to serve arrest warrants.
ICE makes warrantless arrests.
quote:
ICE officers are sworn federal law enforcement officers who operate within the confines of the law. Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides ICE officers the authority to arrest aliens without a judicial warrant.
In fact, no judge in this country has the authority to issue a warrant for a civil immigration violation. Congress, by statute, vested this authorization solely to supervisory immigration officers.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 6:11 pm to 4cubbies
Please don’t act like you really care about the constitution. Your entire party has been vocal about getting rid of it as it’s antiquated (In their opinion).
Why hasn’t been taken down, because both side have the same agenda. Republicans are just controlled opposition.
Why hasn’t been taken down, because both side have the same agenda. Republicans are just controlled opposition.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 6:15 pm to JYD
The answer to this? Flood the system with false reports.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 6:18 pm to JYD
Cool. So I can use this on any construction site and cause widespread pandemonium? Holy shite! Sign me up!
Posted on 6/30/25 at 6:38 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
ICE makes warrantless arrests.
Sometimes.
quote:
What is an administrative arrest?
Let’s begin with known descriptions of ICE’s administrative arrests. The Office of Homeland Security Statistics (OHSS) defines an administrative arrest as “Detaining by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the interior of the United States of an alien unlawfully present in the United States or of a lawfully present aliens (sic) who is subject to removal.”
An ICE report from 2018 defines an administrative arrest as “the arrest of an alien for a civil violation of U.S. immigration laws, which is subsequently adjudicated by an immigration judge or through other administrative processes.”
Since it is relevant for this discussion, a 2023 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report also describes the connection between an administrative warrant and an administrative arrest as follows: “ICE administrative arrests are based on administrative arrest warrants. Unlike judicial warrants, ICE warrants are purely administrative, as they are neither reviewed nor issued by a judge or magistrate, and therefore do not confer the same authority as judicially approved arrest warrants.”
Let’s boil this down to the simplest definition: An administrative arrest is an arrest for a civil violation of U.S. immigration laws. These are not criminal arrests, even if the person arrested has a criminal history.
But wait: Can ICE make arrests without an immigration warrant and can ICE make arrests for criminal violations? Under certain conditions, yes and yes. A recent Congressional Research Service (CRS) report, updated in June 2025, describes the following conditions under which ICE may make an immigration arrest without a warrant:
“1. the alien, in the presence or view of the immigration officer, is entering or attempting to enter the United States unlawfully; or
2. the immigration officer has ‘reason to believe’ that the alien is in the United States unlawfully and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained.”
Since ICE usually does not conduct border enforcement directly, the first one is less likely of a scenario. However, the second point here is crucial, since it implies that as long as an ICE officer says, “Hey, I thought this guy was an illegal [alien] and he was going to get away,” ICE could conduct an administrative arrest against lots of people.
I’m not splitting hairs here. The reason this matters is because when we are writing about administrative arrest data, we should be aware that while these arrests should be accompanied by warrants, there are loopholes. Some percentage of all ICE administrative arrests will have a warrant and some percentage will not. And this administration has an incentive to ignore even the low bar of ensuring that everyone has an administrative warrant.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 7:10 pm to 4cubbies
It sounds like you broke the law and the city is safer for it if you are avoiding speeding in front of small children now. Chalk one up for law enforcement
Now why you support the hindering of ICE agents is the least shocking thing I’ve read today
Now why you support the hindering of ICE agents is the least shocking thing I’ve read today
Posted on 6/30/25 at 7:11 pm to JYD
How do we make reports?
Time to make it look like ICE is everywhere at all times
Time to make it look like ICE is everywhere at all times
This post was edited on 6/30/25 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 6/30/25 at 7:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think people who use Waze should be prosecuted for similar obstruction?
Bro, this is the most braindead logic I've seen on here in a long time. What kind of lawyer are you? I know we all joke that you can't really be a lawyer but with the logic you display on here lately I'm starting to believe it.
If you can't see the difference between actively helping someone to avoid apprehension and alerting someone so they don't commit a violation, you're one terribly shitty lawer.
This post was edited on 6/30/25 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 6/30/25 at 7:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/30/25 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 6/30/25 at 7:31 pm to Barstools
Never thought I would put sfp and 4cubbies together but the insanity in this thread is pretty embarrassing to witness
Posted on 6/30/25 at 7:31 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides ICE officers the authority to arrest aliens without a judicial warrant.
In fact, no judge in this country has the authority to issue a warrant for a civil immigration violation.
This sure seems like ICE doesn't need a warrant and immigration laws and due process have already been followed.
Thanks for the deets.
You're the best
Posted on 6/30/25 at 7:44 pm to beerJeep
quote:
What is the INTENT of the app?
Waze is intended to give you tools to avoid speedtraps as well as dui and insurance checkpoints.
It is INTENDED to allow you to break the law and avoid consequences, how is this hard for you to understand?
Popular
Back to top


1







