re: I just do not understand how the issue of abortion resonates with Democrats.

quote:

---

You are likely a card-carrying, second generation brainwashed anti- abortion evangelical.

---

Or I just understand murdering children is the worst crime imaginable.

The saddest thing about it, is you can’t admit what happens in an abortion. That you have to run from what happens speaks volumes about your willingness to slaughter the innocent.

quote:

---

That's what your preacher has been telling you for 40 years;

---

I’ve never needed a preacher, or anyone else to tell me slaughtering children is wrong.

Who told you killing children was a good thing?

I think you have misunderstood my comments. I’m not saying that America has turned into this dystopian hell already and we have people out here living off rats and bugs to stay alive. We are not at that point yet but we could be very very soon if we do not change direction in November. We as a country can’t keep on absorbing all this damage that these radical far left progressive policies are causing. Biden has certainly put us in decline but Harris would almost certainly cause a level of misery in this country that has never been seen before and it wouldn’t take long for her to destroy the America we grew up knowing. It’s just that simple.

What I was saying in my earlier posts is that we have all these problems like the border, inflation, homelessness, crime, the national debt, and we are on the brink of WW3. I have heard stories that food banks are begging for donations the need is so great. Some parents are going without so their kids can have but for some reason all the Democrats are concerned about is the abortion issue. If people are hurting this bad now then what will things look like when Kamala gets into office and puts her price control policy in place. We have not experienced misery like that in a very long time in the USA but hey at least people can have as many abortions as they want. We will have starving skeletons walking the streets begging for food but if someone wants to have an abortion the day before they are supposed to give birth then that’s awesome as far as the Democrats are concerned. This kind of thinking will destroy us all and it is total madness and insanity that so many would fight to the death for the right to have an abortion anytime they want one. They would rather elect dangerous politicians that will protect their right to an abortion at anytime rather than elect a politician that has good sound economic policy that will allow them to live comfortably and not worry about how far they will go between meals. Like I said earlier at some point self preservation has to kick in right?

quote:

---

As someone has said: "if male was the child-bearing gender, there would be a planned parenthood in every Walmart."

Now don't just scan over that. If males were the ones who became pregnant and bore children, the debate over abortion would not exist. It would be legal everywhere.

---

You may be right. Women don' t have a monopoly on murder. Men too can do evil and vile things.

But on what basis do pro-choice women determine the worth of the pre-born child versus the post-born child? In a pro-choice ethic, one can't.

And as far as I know most pro-life men are not down for murdering our own children.

FTR, your view is rebellion against God's ordained male-female binary and their respective biological roles in bearing offspring.

quote:

---

The point is that men are in charge. They would not put up with being forced to be pregnant. They would legalize abortion and there would be a planned parenthood on every corner.

---

This statement is absurd. The so-called men in charge often pass laws that don’t favor men, just look at divorce laws or draft requirements. Historically, men had to be more selfless in order to provide for their families or defend their nation. In male-dominated societies, it was customary to prioritize women and children in emergencies, hence the saying “women and children first.” In fact, the worst men in history were often those who lacked selflessness.

I am so confused by your words! What do you mean by “if”? There are millions of strong Democratic “male” voters who can now have babies!! The science is settled!!!

Because democrats love murder, hate America, and generally do what is evil in the Eyes of the Lord. Woe to them!

quote:

---

And it’s not even banned or illegal

---

I believe Texas set it at 6 weeks, right? That is essentially banned. A woman could think her cycle is two weeks late, and by the time she realizes she’s pregnant, it’s too late.

Anything less than 12 weeks is a mistake - not that that isn’t the moral answer - it’s just that it is politically indefensible.

quote:

---

This statement is absurd. The so-called men in charge often pass laws that don’t favor men, just look at divorce laws or draft requirements. Historically, men had to be more selfless in order to provide for their families or defend their nation. In male-dominated societies, it was customary to prioritize women and children in emergencies, hence the saying “women and children first.”

---

Bravo! Excellent riposte!

quote:

---

Who is talking about killing children?

The discussion is about non- viable fetuses.

---

"Fetus" is a term used to describe the relative development of a human being, like "infant" or "adolescent."

In Latin (which is where most medical terms are derived from), it means "little human." Or we might say "children."

The word games are not going to work. We all know what's happening with an abortion.

It's a human being.

The fact that it is "non-viable" is as irrelevant as the fact that so is a 50 year old in a coma.

It's demonic activity at work on the Earth. Really no other way to explain it. Nobody should ever get excited about abortion even if you think it should be legal for certain circumstances