Started By
Message

I genuinely hope that I was right and that OJ was really guilty

Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:30 pm
Posted by Wishing Well
Member since Mar 2024
323 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:30 pm
Not because I give a crap about being right about it but because can you friggin imagine living his life afterwards if he really was innocent?

I can't imagine going thru half my adult life branded guilty of such a terrible crime and knowing that everywhere I went, I was seen as a murderer if it weren't true.
Posted by Feelthebarn
Lower Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
2367 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:32 pm to
Rest easy. Even jurors have admitted that they knew he did it. They said they found him not guilty as retaliation for the Rodney king situation as well as general dislike for whitey
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9260 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:34 pm to
He did it
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68466 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:35 pm to
This was one of those where black people just wanted a win even though they knew he was guilty.


Posted by DyeHardDylan
Member since Nov 2011
7730 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Even jurors have admitted that they knew he did it. They said they found him not guilty as retaliation for the Rodney king situation as well as general dislike for whitey


One juror even threw up the black power sign to OJ after the verdict. Pretty soon we as white people need to stop trying to coddle people that collectively hate us.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78953 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Even jurors have admitted that they knew he did it. They said they found him not guilty as retaliation for the Rodney king situation as well as general dislike for whitey


You'd think that would be grounds for a retrial.

ETA: Crackerjack Box attorneys of the board, how does that work when a defendant is found not guilty, but there was evidence of jury tampering? You can't do a resentence b/c he is "innocent". So how does double jeopardy (or not) play a part here?
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 12:55 pm
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13323 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:51 pm to
I guess it depends on how closely you followed the trial, and maybe how old you were at the time, but even with the incompetence of the judge and utter buffoonery of the prosecutor, Stevie Wonder could see OJ committed these crimes from a mile away. How someone could ponder being wrong about it 30 years later is beyond me.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29416 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 12:54 pm to
Don’t worry, he was guilty as hell.

Posted by Nurbis
Member since May 2020
1318 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:19 pm to
Yeah, innocent people aren't going to be driving down the freeway being chased by police with a gun to their head threatening to shoot themselves.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112426 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:23 pm to
He admitted his guilt to Rosie Grier, a football tackle who became a minister and met with OJ in prison. It was not allowed as evidence.
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
5499 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:24 pm to
He admitted it in an interview with Fox that he said was a "hypothetical"

Youtube

Posted by GeauxGoose
Nonya
Member since Dec 2006
2514 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:42 pm to
If you are not religious that's fine, but if your are then you know he has now been judged correctly. There is no hiding once you sit at your final judgement. If the glove doesn't fit, god knows what happened and doesn't give a shite.
Posted by Morpheus
In your Dreams
Member since Apr 2022
4131 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:51 pm to
Think about the Respek.

Or lack there of.

Either way, he was a shitty man.
Posted by EastBankTiger
A little west of Hoover Dam
Member since Dec 2003
21317 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:02 pm to
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10371 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:04 pm to
Any person knowingly rendering innocent verdict after the overwhelming evidence, is damned to hell.

Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
22153 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

He admitted it in an interview with Fox that he said was a "hypothetical"

Never saw that interview before. That definitely was a first person confession. I read the book he wrote, the "hypothetical" part on the killings is a confession as well, but much more carefully worded than this interview.
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
49111 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:26 pm to
Do we know who "Charlie" was?
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
8153 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:28 pm to
Great post about politics.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26105 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:32 pm to
I'm sure there are shitty zoomers that actually believe he was innocent because that generation is mentally fricked, but no one that was conscious at the time of the trial thinks he was innocent. Not the jury, not his lawyers, not anyone.

That was obvious at the time.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44756 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Rest easy. Even jurors have admitted that they knew he did it. They said they found him not guilty as retaliation for the Rodney king situation as well as general dislike for whitey


Black people openly rooting for OJ to get away with murder just because the victims were white really speaks volumes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram