- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I genuinely hope that I was right and that OJ was really guilty
Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:02 am to SixthAndBarone
Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:02 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:Great post simpleton.
Great post about politics.
0
Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:08 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
Either he did it or he took the wrap for his son
What?
I've never heard that theory before.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:13 am to TN Tygah
quote:
I never heard this but I have no doubt this is true whether it’s documented or not.
Well...yeah.
The entire defense was that the po-lice planted the (considerable) physical evidence because we all know the po-lice are corrupt and rasis against black people. That was the whole defense. That's what allowed the jurors to discount all the evidence.
You don't remember Mark Furhman?
Posted on 4/12/24 at 6:25 am to wackatimesthree
Once the race card was issued in that case it was over. Cochran did not need to do much work in the courtroom as the PR campaign had done its work. Still amazed though at Barry Scheck and his indictment of the DNA evidence. That actually was really good work from a purely lawyer and procedure aspect.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 8:28 am to ronricks
I'm curious if the police ever said there was two attackers there (four total people) at the scene? I'd never heard the two assailants theory.
This post was edited on 4/12/24 at 8:35 am
Posted on 4/12/24 at 8:47 am to Feelthebarn
Crazy that with a population of 30%, they made up 80% of the jury. And they admitted to being racist after.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 9:02 am to KiwiHead
The glove moment was pretty huge. The prosecution set the stage for that to be a momentous gotcha moment, and it was precisely that - in the exact reverse direction. That was ample ammunition for the eventual jury nullification result we saw. It was literally epic fail. That’s right, I said literally. And there was ample reason to have averted the debacle
Posted on 4/12/24 at 9:07 am to Smeg
He did it. Unfortunately, his defense team orchestrated an effective theatrical defense, and the prosecution made some silly mistakes.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 9:27 am to davyjones
By that time Clark was dead meat. The fact that she did not object to OJ trying on the glove with a latex or plastic glove on was less than minor league.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 9:34 am to Wishing Well
quote:
Not because I give a crap about being right about it but because can you friggin imagine living his life afterwards if he really was innocent?
He still ended up living somewhat comfortably......after getting out of prison on unrelated charges. I don't feel a bit of sympathy for him.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 9:36 am to Wishing Well
quote:you fricking kiddin me? Dude straight up committed murder but got away with it bc he was black and famous.
it but because can you friggin imagine living his life afterwards if he really was innocent?
Posted on 4/12/24 at 12:49 pm to KiwiHead
Scheck did an outstanding job, but he had very mixed feelings about the case after it was over. He didn’t like the severity of the attacks on the cops, plus he seemed to accept the fact that OJ committed the murders
Posted on 4/12/24 at 1:04 pm to Feelthebarn
quote:
Rest easy. Even jurors have admitted that they knew he did it. They said they found him not guilty as retaliation for the Rodney king situation as well as general dislike for whitey
As well as fear of the mob outside the courthouse.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 1:10 pm to Diseasefreeforall
quote:
He admitted it in an interview with Fox that he said was a "hypothetical"
It was a favorite theory of Agatha Christie: a murderer who gets away with it has an overwhelming need to confess, simply because he has to let the world know how brilliant he was in getting away with it.
Think if SFP murdered someone. He’d be on this board, spilling his guts, inside of 5 minutes.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 1:12 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
Asking OJ to try on the gloves is probably taught in law schools as a textbook "Do not."
Posted on 4/12/24 at 1:15 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Think if SFP murdered someone. He’d be on this board, spilling his guts, inside of 5 minutes.
And telling us how it wasn't acktually murder, but rather, using various loopholes, case law, ancients texts of old English law and generally pulling stuff out of his arse, a legal killing because they couldn't technically prove he did it, despite being caught on video and having a multitude of DNA evidence showing otherwise.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 2:34 pm to idlewatcher
If a jury verdict is clearly tainted via tampering or other means, it is not impossible to detach double jeopardy and retry the defendant. It is exceedingly rare though.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 9:10 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
I've never heard that theory before
It's been out there for years. There's even a book related to that very subject
Posted on 4/12/24 at 9:18 pm to Godfather1
If it doesn’t fit……you must lick tits.
Posted on 4/12/24 at 9:21 pm to Feelthebarn
quote:
Rest easy. Even jurors have admitted that they knew he did it. They said they found him not guilty as retaliation for the Rodney king situation as well as general dislike for whitey
Yep, and if he didn't actually physically do it, he damn knows who did. Some actually think his son did it.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News