Started By
Message

re: I am convinced this woman is demonic

Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:30 am to
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
183708 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:30 am to
quote:

If that doesn't seem suspicious to you


It's not when you are logical.

You, like the others, can't even tell us what leaving the scene alone would have done to solve this mystery you all have concocted.


quote:

So many people here do not care to examine the material of this case.


You have a bastardized version of the materials pieced together by online infulencers who make a living by using clickbait. You, like everyone else in the world outside of the FBI and the prosecutors, have not been privy to all of the actual evidence yet.
Posted by BigAL Golesh
Toomer's Corner
Member since Apr 2026
486 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:

You are talking out of your arse, much like Candace.
are you saying that the original story that the MSM reported was......BOGUS????
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29998 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:37 am to
quote:

You, like the others, can't even tell us what leaving the scene alone would have done to solve this mystery you all have concocted.



Let me go pull out my forensics science degree for you, and field work qualifications.

quote:

You have a bastardized version of the materials pieced together by online infulencers who make a living by using clickbait. You, like everyone else in the world outside of the FBI and the prosecutors, have not been privy to all of the actual evidence yet.



If that's how you want to justify having paid zero attention to the case material when someone you know you're talking to has, that's fine. I have watched Baron/Ian/Candace since October. That is hours a week every week going over lead after lead, detail after detail. You feel wanting, and you lash out at those of us who have.

I am totally cool with changing my opinion if we find out NEW information, but it will have to be totally new, and I very seriously doubt that there will be enough new evidence that will utterly refute about 10-20 major points that have been raised since his death.

I don't care where the truth is found. I would LIKE for the trial to find the truth, but it is irrelevant to me that they do... except in the event that Tyler Robinson's life be destroyed in the event he is innocent, which I believe him to be. What I am most curious about is the degree to which he was involved, as he wasn't chosen to be the fall-guy for no reason.

Unlike you, I will not accept the mainstream media and news and government narrative so easily.

In the end, it doesn't really matter what happens in the trial. We still have people holding onto the JFK assassination, and that is from an era before 1000's of cameras and interconnectivity from the internet, and millions of people solving the problems together. Moreover, people actually liked Charlie because he was a good human. So, it's more personal.

This will not even begin to end with the trial, no matter what outcome that happens.
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
5157 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

would bet you think JFK acted alone, Irag had WMD, we were really attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin, and there is nothing redeeming such thing as MKUltra.


Damn dude, so OJ really didn't do it???

Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
42460 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Yea but she has that one video that only she has seen.. nobody else has seen it.. tune in tomorrow and she might release it.. if she doesn't release it tomorrow, tune in the next day. She has had this video for 10 months and she is going to be releasing it soon so don't forget to tune in!


Sounds like when republicans or the republican doj says.....we got them now, just wait till you see all of these crimes and this evidence we have against whoever opposes us. Just wait, you'll see the true corruption, the true enemy. Just wait......
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28707 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:05 am to
quote:



I think Candace was in love with Charlie and he rejected her. Any hate is out of scorn and jealousy



This explains her self-destruction better than any alternative theory I've seen.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
56213 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:05 am to
quote:

I generally don't hope for bad things to happen to anyone. I am pretty live and let live IRL despite my hazing of idiots on here.

That being said, I would actually laugh and gloat if something bad happened to her.


Not me.

I hope and pray she somehow finds her sanity and lives a wonderful life.
Posted by tigerlion
Member since Jul 2009
2382 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

There is no physical evidence that contradicts the Warren Commission at all


Holy $hit! I did not know anyone on this planet thought this Commission was credible
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29998 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Holy $hit! I did not know anyone on this planet thought this Commission was credible



It's the same thing that would happened to Charlie's case if the internet wasn't here, and droves of evidence the people can figure out by collaborating on the internet.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30537 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:17 am to
It's a shame Candace turned out to be a complete lunatic.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
169557 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:19 am to
Turn on and actually watch the prelim trial..

They just showed to the public and admitted into evidence on scene campus video footage showing Tyler Robinson IDed by a police car and his license plate. As well as TR walking with a gait and limp.

I now have zero doubt unlike Candace, Tucker whoever. TR killed CK.

If you are a forensic expert, you know in basic common sense that to prove an entity, Israel, Sam Hill. The CIA, WERE BEHIND assassinating CK.

It will never be proven even 100 years from now that the democrats paid for it, or CIA media brainwashed TR to assassinate CK. If the files were published in 60 years no one would care to discuss it 60 minutes after the instant release.

There will probably be a Candace blaming Israel in 60 years. Why waste time?
This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 11:20 am
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29998 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

It's a shame Candace turned out to be a complete lunatic.



How would you know? All you've seen is what the news tells you to think about her.

Have you watched Baron's show? Objectively, he is as even keel and nice-guy as they get. Do you also call him a lunatic because he doesn't believe Tyler Robinson did it?
Posted by Hognutz
Member since Sep 2018
2665 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:34 am to
I lean there too.

How do you keep the most heavily armed nation on earth controlled long enough to install the infrastructure to enslave them? Through the most sophisticated propaganda the world has ever seen. So sophisticated in fact that it is viewed as "freedom" to others around the world.
It is those most likely to object who are captured and mesmerized by a cult like figure whom they will remain loyal to to their own demise. The greatest trojan horse in modern history is their hero. They will all one day hate themselves as they helpless watch their children and grandchildren enslaved.
Look around MAGA boys, the plans are accelerating with incredible boldness while your cult chooses willful ignorance to their own demise.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29998 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:36 am to
Timeline and rifle disassembly/reassembly impossible - He could not have disassembled the Mauser rifle on the rooftop, jumped down in ~6 seconds, then reassembled it in the woods and abandoned it wrapped in a towel.

Discord/text admissions fabricated - Messages to his partner (including during arrest) were posted while he was already detained and Mirandized; someone else accessed his account. Who?

Lack of direct evidence like video — No footage of him actually shooting despite 1000+ UVU cameras and widespread phones; only “sketchy videos” provided. Today, the prosecution has 100% confirmed there is no video of him taking the shot. That ship has sailed.

There was also evidence of AES being destroyed (i think a week?) after his death. This place manufactures explosives and incendiary devices, and there is evidence a unique, rare, small contract came into place RIGHT before Charlie's murder. Very sketchy explosion. Almost 20 people died. This isn't a fertilizer plant. This is a place that has employees that specifically know how to maintain explosives.

The white house also denied FOIA requests about specific flight logs. That is not something they should be able to do. I'm poorly articulating this one, but it is worse than I have explained.

The hospital they took him to was FURTHER than the nearest one. That's odd considering the doctor who received Charlie's body had been recently transferred to this hospital.

Ballistics and wound mismatch — A .30-06 round from the alleged rifle is highly unlikely to cause the observed damage. There was no exit wound. They would easily be able to find all fragments and do forensics with that. It should, at the least, confirm the grain (again i'm not a forensics guy. just making the point they would be able to deduce quite a lot with an entire bullet inside his body).




There's probably 10-15 other critical points that have been raised. These are all off the top of my head.

Let's remember, the defense only needs to raise a reasonable doubt. There is more than a reasonable doubt. And the prosecution should have to answer all these questions, and more. They are going to need a MOUNTAIN of unknown evidence to this point if the defense does even a half-assed job.



This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 11:38 am
Posted by Louisianalabguy
Member since Jul 2017
1968 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:41 am to
quote:

I am convinced this woman is demonic

Well, her husband is a royal English citizen. Don't know if you subscribe to "permethian action" but look at some of their videos, you'll see and hear arguments no one else is making. They make a lot of sense with their claims that the British Empire is much stronger than most think.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30537 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:42 am to
quote:

How would you know? All you've seen is what the news tells you to think about her.

Have you watched Baron's show? Objectively, he is as even keel and nice-guy as they get. Do you also call him a lunatic because he doesn't believe Tyler Robinson did it?

I've followed Candace for a long time, I I don't need to watch the news and I don't watch the news. This Baron guy you're talking about is also not someone I watch. I am familiar with what a crazy black chick looks like and Candace fits the description.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29998 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:43 am to
quote:

This Baron guy you're talking about is also not someone I watch.


Give his content a try. He is a family man. (heads up, he has a goofy arse laugh). Totally hinged. Rational brass tacks approach. He's a lawyer, so his pursuit is valid from the standpoint of how it will be processed in court (or how it should be)

I concede that candace is an angry woman. she doesn't have the best optics for people that have any skepticism of her. baron has had a meteoric rise since charlie died because his is the better material for it all. he has the better process by far. and he has no emotional baggage with it that is reasonable for people to question. i, too, suspect Candace loved Charlie at some point in a non-platonic way. even so, i suspect her motivation is BASED in that love and anger for the loss.
This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 11:46 am
Posted by TigerAxeOK
In the woods and by the waters.
Member since Dec 2016
38684 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:

I’m team Candace. She will be vindicated in the end. She’s speaking truth to you fools!!

I really don't know if you're trolling or being serious.

If you're trolling, well done. If you're serious, seek help because Owens has flip-flopped and promised "free beer tomorrow" for almost a year, and you're still thirsty and hanging on her every word.

She is a succubus.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29998 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:

I really don't know if you're trolling or being serious.



Are you that new to the game that you think people don't buy into her narrative?

If you don't like her content, try out Baron Coleman.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6963 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 12:00 pm to
The issue that made me really question the narrative is
-30-06 not going through a human neck at 140yds. that is ridiculous

Then you start looking at the evidence presented to us through a different lens.
-the driveway video of him limping because of a rifle in his pants. Even if in 2 pieces, why didn't we get video of him going up the stairs but just got a still shot with nothing visible in his pants but a cell phone? Was his cell phone on that roof? Should be easy to find out.

-No way he disassembled rifle to come down off the roof in that amount of time. The camera that sees him coming off the roof had a wide view of him leaving. That camera should've caught the shot. It had a very wide view and they would've seen him shoot and disassemble.

-The fragments recovered and their spread make no sense coming from a 30-06. I can't wrap my head around that. They should be able to collect all fragments and get a weight. Also I can't understand how there is no exit wound. The only thing I can maybe guess at is that it was a tamed down special load with a fragmenting bullet. Tyler doesn't have the ability to do this.

-why reassemble the rifle and hide it? Has prosecution said he disassembled on roof since the video doesn't show a full length rifle?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram