- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How did the Mueller special counsel appointment go from Russian collusion to porn stars?
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:12 am to SCLibertarian
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:12 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
let them refer matters to the DOJ for prosecution and let the DOJ exercise its discretion in determining whether or not to prosecute.
Isn’t this what the SCO did with Cohen?
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 9:13 am
2
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:14 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:How is the payment related to collusion with Russia to influence the election?
I believe the payment is the issue.
Are you saying the SC was appointed to investigate Trump's entire life regardless of any connection to Russian collusion with the election?
You've just proven the point of this thread.
quote:
How dumb are you?
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:14 am to The Spleen
quote:
ut I'm sure you know all the details of the investigation.
Just the ones that matter.
It's a sham
It's a witch hunt
Bob mueller is a piece of shite for being part of it
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:15 am to Decatur
quote:So what? How does that change the point I'm making with this thread?
Isn’t this what the SCO did with Cohen?
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:17 am to ibldprplgld
quote:All evidence to the contrary....
If the police get a warrant to search your house for drugs but find a shite load of AK-47s instead, are you still in trouble?
You can't possibly be this stupid.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:17 am to LSURussian
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:18 am to DarthRebel
quote:
No. If you bought/obtained them legally, there is no crime.
Dumb example is dumb
Let's throw illegally obtained in there if that's what you need to float your boat.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:18 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:How would they know?
Let's throw illegally obtained in there if that's what you need to float your boat.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:18 am to Jbird
quote:
I believe the payment is the issue
Why?
That's what the investigation is for.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:19 am to LSURussian
The sc will move to jaywalking from 50yrs ago... if they think they can "get him".
Msm hosts and articles would have a deeply concerned, ominous tone when discussing the jaywalking, also. They would claim how serious it is.
And some democrat politicians would get on tv and say shite like - "the president is just trying to change the subject.. but we aren't having it, he has to answer for his crime.".
Msm hosts and articles would have a deeply concerned, ominous tone when discussing the jaywalking, also. They would claim how serious it is.
And some democrat politicians would get on tv and say shite like - "the president is just trying to change the subject.. but we aren't having it, he has to answer for his crime.".
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 9:23 am
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:20 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Not if the underlying basis for the warrant wasn't sufficient probable cause.
This this this^^^^^^[
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:21 am to LSURussian
quote:
How is the payment related to collusion with Russia to influence the election?
I never said that. Hence my weapons analogy.
quote:
How dumb are you?
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:21 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:What is wrong with paying her?
That's what the investigation is for.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:21 am to Decatur
quote:
Isn’t this what the SCO did with Cohen?
I'm referring to the entire investigation. What prevents Congress from investigating Russian collusion? What prevents Congress from establishing a commission, consisting of former intelligence officials and investigate reporters, to find out all they can about Russian meddling? What prohibits Congress from investigating allegations of obstruction of justice? They have the right to subpoena witnesses during the course of an investigation and fact find. They also can refer complaints to DOJ for prosecution.
The Special Counsel is a secretive and unaccountable authority. We deserve to know the facts about Mueller's investigation and the facts, or the lack thereof, that he's uncovered. Otherwise this whole saga will never end.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:22 am to Jbird
quote:
How would they know?
An investigation.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:23 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:So serve a search warrant and then run amok on anything and everything.
An investigation.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:23 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
That's what the investigation is for.
Are you paying attention to anything or just making shite up as you go?
The one body that should have access to that information is being blocked. Congressmen have repeatedly requested the DOJ give them the memo regarding the scope of the Russia probe and they've been repeatedly denied.
Not sure how you know exactly what the investigation is for when Congress doesn't.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:25 am to Jbird
quote:
So serve a search warrant and then run amok on anything and everything.
Isn't that what police do when they enter your house with a warrant. Look for any illegal activity?
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:26 am to LSURussian
It all started as an investigation looking for a crime
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:26 am to LSURussian
What is your point?
If the SCO during the course of its investigation comes across information involving a potential crime not within its jurisdiction then it consults with the DOJ as to whether it gets additional jurisdiction or refers to matter to a US attorney with jurisdiction.
In the Cohen case, SDNY was determined to have jurisdiction.
If the SCO during the course of its investigation comes across information involving a potential crime not within its jurisdiction then it consults with the DOJ as to whether it gets additional jurisdiction or refers to matter to a US attorney with jurisdiction.
In the Cohen case, SDNY was determined to have jurisdiction.
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 9:36 am
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News