re: He Made the World Safe for Democracy, but Let's Cancel Him Anyway

Got us into a stupid war, and on the wrong side

Screened Birth of a Nation at the White House

Pushed for the precursor of the UN

The founder of modern Progressive Liberalism


frick Woodrow Wilson

That's essentially what's going to happen

quote:

---

I keep saying this.

This whole movement isn’t about equality. This whole movement wants to wipe white folks from any sort of recognition.

---

It’s about destroying America and them assuming power, so they can define the terms going forward.

quote:

---

This is the classic statement that leads to the destruction of everything.

---

and what can you or i do to prevent it in 2020?

protect your own, let the world frick itself up.

lets catch up this week

History will cease to exist prior to 1970.

England, Austria-Hungary, Belgiumand Germany we’re all constitutional monarchies.

The only true autocracy in the was was Imperial Russia who was on the same side as the US.

My point is that 1: WWI didn’t make the world safer for democracy and

2: Germans were singing ships
With American on them 1915 and Wilson didn’t enter the way until the Zimmerman Telegram offered Mexico Texas, Arizona and New Mexico. In a war that started in 1914, and was sinking ships with American on them in 1915 the US didn’t get involved till 1917.

Let’s not act like Wilson was super eager to get into this war.

quote:

---

Woodrow Wilson was one of our worst Presidents, only second behind Buchanan.

---

Damn worse than Carter?

quote:

---

He had lopsided policies in WWI where he said that Germany couldn't attack British or French ships with American citizens on them (which how the hell was Germany supposed to know that)

---

Submarines were considered to be commerce raiders and were supposed to abide by the laws governing commerce raiders. Those rules were established by the 1856 Paris Treaty, 1907 Hague Conventions, and the 1909 Declaration concerning the Laws of Naval War. According to the cruiser rules, submarines were suppose to surface and inspect a ship. If it was found to be carrying war contraband then the submarine could sink it only after allowing all passengers and crew a reasonable amount of time to leave the ship. That is how they would know if Americans were on board or not.

quote:

---

idn't give the same stipulations to the British and French shooting at German ships with Americans on them,

---

That was not really an issue. The German navy was never able to break the British blockade of German ports. Since the German navy could not break the blockade, the British navy could stop, search, turn away neutral shipping, and sink or seize German merchant shipping in accordance with the cruiser laws.

ETA: Not defending Wilson because f**k the father of progressivism. I was simply answering the question about how U-boats were supposed to tell if Americans were on board a ship or not.

One of the biggest dim scumbags of all time.