- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has anyone noticed the AI description of Tiger Rant Politics? Please verify critical facts
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:21 am to AubieinNC2009
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:21 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:
seems pretty accurate
quote:
lack of inclusivity
That part isn't accurate.
Any DU asshat can come in here and blather ridiculous bullshite...it's not just the rest of us.
0
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:22 am to bamaclownbaby
quote:
The same topics get posted over and over with huge upvote to down vote ratios and no one says Germans.
That's because everyone is drawing from the same well. It's just a regurgitation of X content followed by some original discourse and a lot of in-fighting sprinkled in.
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 9:23 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:24 am to Timeoday
That's why it's called, "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE". It's not really very intelligent.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:26 am to Timeoday
I disagree with the Tiger Rant description.
It's mixing the Political Talk board in there. Tiger rant is solidly LSU sports, this place is some politics and some wingnuts regurgitating Twitter and clickme political podcasts.
It's mixing the Political Talk board in there. Tiger rant is solidly LSU sports, this place is some politics and some wingnuts regurgitating Twitter and clickme political podcasts.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:28 am to Bard
quote:
Strengths: Good for raw, unvarnished Southern conservative perspectives; quick breaking news aggregation from posters; strong regional flavor (Louisiana/SEC politics bleed into national discussions). If you're aligned with that worldview or just want to lurk for entertainment/drama, it can be engaging
Hell Yeah!
quote:
Weaknesses: Echo chamber tendencies, heavy moderation inconsistencies (some say it's lax on right-leaning content but quick to ban critics), and a reputation that turns off outsiders. It's not a neutral or balanced source—more of a community venting space than objective analysis.
Utter bullshite.
Anyone can post as long as you don't break the rules...it's not rocket surgery.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:33 am to Timeoday
There are several in this thread already going on the defensive, not realizing that they are actually proving the AI description to be spot on. And it will continue.
And it will continue. This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 9:34 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:35 am to Timeoday
Yeah that about sums it up. Old man politics and schoolyard level shenanigans.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:35 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
There are several in this thread already going on the defensive, not realizing that they are actually proving the AI description to be spot on. And it will continue.
The reading comprehension showcased in this thread leaves a lot to be desired.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:39 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
It's just a regurgitation of X content followed by some original discourse and a lot of in-fighting sprinkled in.
This place looked like X before X became X.
During the censorship reign of terror TD was an outpost of lightly censored content. Twitter at the time wouldn't have allowed half of what got posted here.
Since X has relaxed it's heavy hand it's content became more like TD's, not the other way around.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:41 am to DMAN1968
quote:quote:Utter bullshite.
Weaknesses: Echo chamber tendencies, heavy moderation inconsistencies (some say it's lax on right-leaning content but quick to ban critics), and a reputation that turns off outsiders. It's not a neutral or balanced source—more of a community venting space than objective analysis.
Anyone can post as long as you don't break the rules...it's not rocket surgery.
Agreed, that was the only real issue I found wrong in the assessment. There's no telling where it pulled that from though and there's no real way for it to verify if it's even true (thus relying only unproven statements and feelings) without the admins posting data showing whether or not it is.
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 9:41 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:42 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Since X has relaxed it's heavy hand it's content became more like TD's, not the other way around.
Sure but X isn't pulling its content from here. The flow goes the other way around. The poster I responded to noted that we have a lot of similar threads. Those have increased in incidence as X has become more relaxed. That's my point.
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 9:48 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:46 am to Timeoday
Jack wagons and asshats ,ok , just don't show any n(i)pples .
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:48 am to Timeoday
I dont think extreme means what they think it means
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:52 am to Bard
In fairness, AI stated:
That information is likely gathered from other places on the Internet. So it probably is accurate with a preface of “some say.”
quote:
some say it's lax on right-leaning content but quick to ban critics and a reputation that turns off outsiders. It's not a neutral or balanced source—more of a community venting space than objective analysis.
That information is likely gathered from other places on the Internet. So it probably is accurate with a preface of “some say.”
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:54 am to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
like being an asshat.
Probably adding it to my bio later today.
"Asshat. A badge of honor, given by artificial intelligence."
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:55 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
Sure but X isn't pulling its content from here. The flow goes the other way around.
I see you point about the current state of things.
But the type of content you see on X today wasn't there during Twitter, it was here though.
I think that type of content was always under the surface but there were few places that allowed it to bubble up. Now that X allows it, you see it there but on a massive scale because TD is small. X presents a giant pool of content with easy access and so we got a bit lazy over here and we borrow it because it is the easy button.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:18 am to Bard
quote:
quote:
quote:
Weaknesses: Echo chamber tendencies, heavy moderation inconsistencies (some say it's lax on right-leaning content but quick to ban critics), and a reputation that turns off outsiders. It's not a neutral or balanced source—more of a community venting space than objective analysis.
Utter bullshite.
Anyone can post as long as you don't break the rules...it's not rocket surgery.
Agreed, that was the only real issue I found wrong in the assessment. There's no telling where it pulled that from though and there's no real way for it to verify if it's even true (thus relying only unproven statements and feelings) without the admins posting data showing whether or not it is.
Outside of this place there are only three things I've seen people write about this board:
Heavy MAGA
Heavy Q
You get banned for disagreeing with the Q stuff or MAGA stuff
Q is old news, obviously. I followed some old youtube Q discussions. It was...odd.
Guy above says admins could post data. That might settle it. Post the names of people that got banned since Q or covid or some other event and tell AI to analyze the content from those people.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:31 am to TrueTiger
quote:
This place looked like X before X became X.
During the censorship reign of terror TD was an outpost of lightly censored content. Twitter at the time wouldn't have allowed half of what got posted here.
Since X has relaxed it's heavy hand it's content became more like TD's, not the other way around.
Which, at least to me, underscores that there is a large audience out there who sees things roughly the same we do. At the very least, they see it more conservatively than many social media sites allow (whether through outright bans or shadow bans).
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:34 am to Timeoday
quote:
"racist, idiot, half-brained asshats,
I appreciate the personal shoutout
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:36 am to Timeoday
quote:
"bitter old men" and "racist, idiot, half-brained asshats,"
Hey I'm not racist!
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News