- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Group launches ad blitz threatening lawyers' licenses if they work for Trump
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:09 am to Tasseo
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:09 am to Tasseo
quote:
Another problem is allowing people to dismiss others without facts.
You mean lawsuits?
It's all the same stuff. They've yet to show their work. Like the same lawyers who led the suits that got dismissed prior to "being able to show evidence" got suspended because they didn't provide the evidence to the bar, either.
What are they waiting for? They have had 4 years to release it publicly and wouldn't even do it when their law licenses were under attack.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:12 am to SlowFlowPro
Jenna Ellis died for Trump's sins.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In Louisiana, threatening to file a bar complaint is unethical (but I doubt any of the lawyers who commented are licensed here).
Like they give a damn about ethics.
If they did, they wouldn't be threatening people in the first place, and of course here you come riding in on your white horse...
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What are they waiting for? They have had 4 years to release it publicly and wouldn't even do it when their law licenses were under attack
Give me a break. A 70 yo woman is in jail for 7yrs for thinking she had the authority to have post election machines audited by a 3rd party. Did she go about it the right way? Who knows, since I'm thinking there was no official process in place. Just like the rest of the nation that there is a 2-3 moth process to truly find a way to audit. And of course now you people push to extend out elections for weeks so that audit window is even smaller.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:15 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I think 99% of their job is sending out emails trying to get me to sue someone, anyone.
Hell, they call you and snail mail you in FL. Traffic reports are public records. They call, I see you were in an accident. Do you need assistance recovering damages? I simply respond GFY yourself. If I wanted a lawyer, it wouldn't be some a-hole cold calling accident victims.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:18 am to Bunk Moreland
John Eastman turned real evil in 2020
Poor Jenna fell for his BS
It's crazy what hopium + groupthink makes intelligent people believe.
Poor Jenna fell for his BS
quote:
Even after Jan. 6, Eastman was still talking about the 2020 election not yet being certain.
Former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann told investigators that the day after the insurrection, Eastman raised the issue of disputed votes in Georgia, and Hershmann recalled what he told Eastman in their phone call.
"I don't want to hear any other f-ing words coming out of your mouth other than 'orderly transition.' Repeat those words to me. And eventually, he said 'orderly transition.' I said, 'Good, John,'" Herschmann said in his recorded testimony played Thursday.
Hershmann said he then told Eastman to get a "great f****** criminal defense lawyer. You're going to need it."
It's crazy what hopium + groupthink makes intelligent people believe.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:20 am to Tasseo
quote:
A 70 yo woman is in jail for 7yrs for thinking she had the authority to have post election machines audited by a 3rd party.
That is a very euphemistic way to describe the facts of an irrelevant scenario to what I posted.
quote:
And of course now you people push to extend out elections for weeks so that audit window is even smaller.
Where did I say any such thing?
The laws to challenge elections in these states are pretty set and longstanding.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
Hey Slo, serious question. Do you always correct these post because you are anti-MAGA? Or do you comment on all post dealing with law? In other words are you just sticking it to Trumpers because you don’t like him? I wonder do you see any uneven “justice” aimed at him as well as mainstream news coverage, or is it every non-lefties imagination .
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:26 am to SlowFlowPro
You are a leftie lawyer dude. Like it or not. Agree with it our not, that is your reputation, so yeah you get lumped in.
And no need for the BS on laws being established, especially when talking about the 2020 election that had numerous election law changes prior to it, so if laws/rules didn't matter prior then you can't all of a sudden fall back on your heels on post election laws being set.
And no need for the BS on laws being established, especially when talking about the 2020 election that had numerous election law changes prior to it, so if laws/rules didn't matter prior then you can't all of a sudden fall back on your heels on post election laws being set.
This post was edited on 10/13/24 at 11:29 am
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:27 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The recriminations are going to be so epic
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:30 am to Lige
quote:
Do you always correct these post because you are anti-MAGA? Or do you comment on all post dealing with law?
I do not comment on literally any post/thread involving a legal topic, no.
quote:
are you just sticking it to Trumpers because you don’t like him?
I don't really dislike Trump. I'm not a full fan of his political platform.
My aim isn't really at Trump directly, though, more the culture of insanity that exploded in 2019 among his supporters. It's really killed this board.
I'm trying to make the Poli Board Great Again, if you will.
Lots of the MAGA-centric posters are responding with "We're not going back"
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:31 am to Tasseo
quote:
You are a leftie lawyer dude.
Because I like credible evidence?
quote:
that is your reputation
Among the Idiocracy
quote:
no need for the BS on laws being established, especially when talking about the 2020 election that had numerous election law changes prior to it,
This has nothing to do with the conversation/discussion.
No lawyer was punished for pointing this fact out.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What is the problem with a person or group saying they will report fraudulent/unethical behavior in attorneys if it is discovered?
Because you know damn well they are talking only about lawyers who are in maga sphere.
They would just ignore it from anyone else.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:41 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
There will need to be a replacement for the AMA and the bar association moving foreword along with other certification organizations who have been wholly captured and weaponized along political lines.
Between that and DEI the private sector is being made non-viable for anyone who doesn’t play ball with the establishment.
Between that and DEI the private sector is being made non-viable for anyone who doesn’t play ball with the establishment.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:42 am to dgnx6
quote:
Because you know damn well they are talking only about lawyers who are in maga sphere.
Where did I attack the people who filed bar complaints against Fani/Wade?
Or that the prosecution against Jason Williams and his law partner was wrong/political? I posted I thought the jury's decision against JW was pretty absurd.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:49 am to idlewatcher
quote:
You know exactly what they’re doing you disingenuous frick
You are talking to a fricking lawyer
Posted on 10/13/24 at 11:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:See how much the Leftists care about rights? One of the founding principles is that everyone deserves a competent defense. Yet.. the Left thinks only select people deserve those basic rights. Who is the real threat?
Dershowitz told Just the News in a statement that what the group is doing is "pure McCarthyism."
"They already filed a complaint against me," he said. "It’s pure McCarthyism. And unethical. And it’s scaring some lawyers away."
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's saying if they find unethical conduct they will file
Say, like retrying a case, which was already passed statute of limitations , while upgrading it from a misdemeanor to a felony?
Or bringing frivolous lawsuits that have no basis in law or fact?
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They filed a bunch of fraudulent pleadings and could not provide the least bit of evidence or precedent to support them. That's unethical.
Yeah. The legal profession is all about ethics.
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
who lent their credibility as officers of the court to Donald Trump to file factually and legally baseless claims to overturn legitimate election results
That's dubious at best. It's still people trying to control the flow of information. Who gets to decide what is legally baseless? There are legally baseless suits filed every day.
Popular
Back to top



2






