re: Group launches ad blitz threatening lawyers' licenses if they work for Trump

quote:

---

None of that involved preemptive threats

---

I posted their actual statement, which was not this.

It's being misreported by "Just the News".

quote:

---

“Across the country, lawyers who lent their credibility as officers of the court to Donald Trump to file factually and legally baseless claims to overturn legitimate election results have been investigated by state bar associations, been fined, had their licenses suspended, and even disbarred,” said The 65 Project Managing Director Michael Teter. “We have filed 86 bar complaints to date and are reminding lawyers that we – and the public – will be watching them.”

---

That's not a pre-emptive threat other than the general "if you commit fraud, we will report you" variety.

quote:

---

That's not a pre-emptive threat other than the general "if you commit fraud, we will report you" variety.

---

***** but only if you do things that make us mad. If you’re on our team you gucci fam.





Aka. Show me the man, I’ll show you the crime.

quote:

---

Are you being naive or just dishonest here?

---

I'm correcting bad reporting by "Just the News" (who also seems to have a problem with how they date their articles)

What is the problem with a person or group saying they will report fraudulent/unethical behavior in attorneys if it is discovered?

This isnt lawfare- SFP

Who cares all he needs is Habba Bubba

quote:

---

I think 99% of their job is sending out emails trying to get me to sue someone, anyone.

---

Yeah. That’s unethical. It’s an embarrassing profession.

quote:

---

So a subjective opinion, not facts, from a militant far-leftie is now what the Bar and Courts are to move forward with to judge lawyers.

---

Facts are the problem with the 2020 fraudsters/grifters. The lawyers are allowed to show their work/evidence. None have. Literally none. That's the problem.

Just look at this from Queen of the Kraken, Sydney Powell

quote:

---

Sidney Powell admitted in a filing in federal court that “no reasonable person would conclude that [her] statements were truly statements of fact.” Powell made the filing in response to a defamation suit from Dominion Voting Systems in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

“In the face of legal action, Sidney Powell admitted that her effort to make millions lying to the American people had no facts to begin with,” said Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. “While the loss of the Senate due to her lies will have ramifications for years, I most sympathize with those who believed her in the first place and who she now considers not reasonable enough to realize she should not have been taken seriously.”

---

quote:

---

Powell made her admission in a filing in Dominion’s $1.3 billion lawsuit against her for defamation. Powell and her lawyers acknowledge regarding the allegedly defamatory statements regarding Dominion Voting Systems, “no reasonable person would conclude that [her] statements were truly statements of fact.” In other words, she does not consider those who believe her voter fraud claims “reasonable.”

The filing says that the claims Powell made in interviews on Fox News and Fox Business, and in a press conference at the Republican National Committee are not statements of fact. In particular, her claims “that she had evidence that the election result was the ‘greatest crime of the century if not the life of the world,’” or that Democrats “developed a computer system to alter votes electronically” would not be accepted by a “reasonable person” as “statements of fact.”

---

quote:

---

Finally, Powell and her lawyers admit that her claims about voter fraud, stolen elections, or switched votes were “her opinions and legal theories” only.

---

Now, any of them who relied solely on novel legal theories that didn't involve fraudulent claims without evidence? Punitive measures are bullshite.

quote:

---

Imagine quoting Ratsberger like its a win

---

That was just the first link on google. The facts/admissions aren't at issue.

quote:

---

What SOS is so pathetic they write something like that

---

She made up a lot of bullshite claims against him and GA in 2020. You don't think he should respond to her admitted lies?

quote:

---

She made up a lot of bullshite claims against him and GA in 2020. You don't think he should respond to her admitted lies?

---

Why does he need to respond if its all BS

Nothing is all BS surrounding that dude and you know it

Both Powell and him are dbags

quote:

---

Facts are the problem with the 2020 fraudsters/grifters. The lawyers are allowed to show their work/evidence. None have. Literally none. That's the problem.

---

Another problem is allowing people to dismiss others without facts. That's what is happening. Discussion, full review, etc to make sure we know what the facts are being squashed to early by opposition that don't bring facts either.

"Don't trust what you see" gaslighting is the approach that is being used and allowed. Just like calling everything a CP.