Started By
Message

re: Fun new influencer drama re: DataRepublican.

Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:11 am to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
60327 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:11 am to
quote:

But no one ever does.


bullshite. Again. You’re a moron.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67886 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:

She was one of the main ones parroting the 100% bullshite lie that "125 year olds are still receiving social security!!!" during the DOGE mess.


That was completely true.
Posted by Barfunkle
Basement
Member since May 2025
260 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:14 am to
quote:

So, it turns out she was on the Dept of War payroll


Lol, didn't this broad accuse Fuentes of being a fed?
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:15 am
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62828 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Cool. Now do the Obama & Biden administrations' relationships with CBS, CNN, MSNBC, et al



We're OK with the current administration or current wanna-be celebrity social media weirdos with "republican" in their handles misbehaving as long as the people we relentlessly attack and attempt to discredit also misbehaved a dozen+ years ago.

We are good with corruption and propaganda as long as it's perpetual.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62828 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Cool. Now do the Obama & Biden administrations' relationships with CBS, CNN, MSNBC, et al



We're OK with the current administration or current wanna-be celebrity social media weirdos with "republican" in their handles misbehaving as long as the people we relentlessly attack and attempt to discredit also misbehaved a dozen+ years ago.

We are good with corruption and propaganda as long as it's perpetual.
Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
2246 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:15 am to
quote:

She was one of the main ones parroting the 100% bullshite lie that "125 year olds are still receiving social security!!!" during the DOGE mess.




That was actually true ron.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
13340 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:16 am to
quote:

That was completely true.



#1. The Social Security Administration has a strict rule that automatically stops benefit payments for any account holder turning 115 years old, making payouts to 125-year-olds impossible.
#2. The Social Security Administration's own acting commissioner clarified that these old records belong to people who have a Social Security number but no recorded date of death in legacy files, meaning they are listed in the database but not actively getting checks.

'DataRepublican' was so dumb she didn't know about #1 and in #2 she thought just because someone was listed in the database it meant they were still getting checks.

It was 100% bullshite.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
13340 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:16 am to
quote:

That was actually true ron.


It was 100% bullshite. A lie.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
51682 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:17 am to
quote:

Was she any less accurate because she was employed by DOW?


Bunk doesn't care about the truth. He only exists to hate Trump.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67886 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

#1. The Social Security Administration has a strict rule that automatically stops benefit payments for any account holder turning 115 years old, making payouts to 125-year-olds impossible.
#2. The Social Security Administration's own acting commissioner clarified that these old records belong to people who have a Social Security number but no recorded date of death in legacy files, meaning they are listed in the database but not actively getting checks.

'DataRepublican' was so dumb she didn't know about #1 and in #2 she thought just because someone was listed in the database it meant they were still getting checks.

It was 100% bullshite.


Nope, it was true. But you can believe whatever you want. You are beyond help, so I won't be wasting my time.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61614 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Cool. Now do the Obama & Biden administrations' relationships with CBS, CNN, MSNBC, et al
why?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60296 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:19 am to
quote:

People are saying that makes her a paid propagandist.


People like John Thune? People like Punchbowl Media?

Oh, wait... those questions are redundant of one another.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57575 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Which people?
Glen Greenwald for one.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:21 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99798 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:20 am to
quote:

why?


Because they are continuing the propganda.

4chubbies is all good with it and I assume you are as well

Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
13340 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Nope, it was true. But you can believe whatever you want. You are beyond help, so I won't be wasting my time.


Yeah no wonder you want to 'move on' now that you know the system kicks people off automatically at a certain threshold that proves DataRepublican was full of shite.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23641 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:26 am to
quote:

bullshite. Again. You’re a moron


Randomly picked the first page of a thread I figured would have the go-to response. Can you show me which ones refute the reports instead of attacking the source?




Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
2246 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:26 am to
By the way, datarepublican never made that claim. She gave an explanation of why it would be possible to find people of that age in the database due to other people using a deceased person's SS#.

She focused on problems like SSN misuse. Like multiple people using the same number, impacts on legitimate SSDI applicants, missing or incomplete birthdate data creating loopholes. She didn't claim direct payments to 125-year-olds.

You're an idiot
Posted by Sams Crow
Idaho
Member since Apr 2026
540 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:29 am to
quote:

All she does is churn out AI slop.

This is an award-winning example of unbelievably stupid posts. She is the very opposite of that.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:33 am
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67886 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Yeah no wonder you want to 'move on' now that you know the system kicks people off automatically at a certain threshold that proves DataRepublican was full of shite.


Except it doesn't prove anything. There is tons of fraud in social programs.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
13340 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:31 am to
quote:

We're OK with the current administration or current wanna-be celebrity social media weirdos with "republican" in their handles

They are ok with a lot of things as long as Republicans are doing it.

Examples:
Out of control spending
Stimulus
Homosexuality
Price Controls
Tariffs

and a host of other things
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram