- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fun new influencer drama re: DataRepublican.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:07 am to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:07 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
People are saying that makes her a paid propagandist.
Name them.
0
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:08 am to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
Which people? And as the previous poster asked, please identify the inaccuracies.
Jesus Christ. Is this really where some of you are? The point of propaganda is to drive narratives. Hand picking facts to fit your narrative is propaganda especially when no other counter information is being delivered. Add in the fact that this person or more likely persons is a fricking employee of the Dept of War……
We are so fricking doomed.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:11 am to idlewatcher
why would she imply Nivk Fuentes is a fed if the implication isn't negative? This was before she was employed a as a fed herself and refused to disclose that until somebody exposed her
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:17 am to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
Which people?
Glenn cuckwald a paid propagandist who eats feet and racist Pedro
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:24 am to Bunk Moreland
You are overly obsessed with everything social media and online. Do you not see that? Step away from the computer and the phone and live a little.
You seem to live in a bubble where you worry about the most insignificant shite and wait for gotcha moments. No one cares.
You seem to live in a bubble where you worry about the most insignificant shite and wait for gotcha moments. No one cares.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:27 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
People are saying that makes her a paid propagandist.
So is the entire fricking MSM you disingenuous jackass, but not a word about them huh?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:29 am to sidewalkside
quote:
This is the world that extremely online people live in and worry about.
Well, yeah, that's the target audience of influencers
ETA: Hi little piggy and his other little oinkers
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:30 am to lurking
quote:
Other than to continue to erode the facade of “independent” journalism.
Why didn’t she disclose this back in June?
According to the quote in the OP, she began working for the DoD in July. We going to pretend that was a long time ago?
ETA: Please point to anything false she has reported as a result of this relationship.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 8:31 am
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:31 am to imjustafatkid
She didn’t disclose it is the point. Why didn’t she?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:33 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
When are you gonna care about the Democrats propaganda in corporate media?
He won’t. He already said he’s not voting because Massie, Fishback and Bilzarian lost their primaries.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:34 am to lurking
You wanted her to announce shes working at the DOW qhen all tbe loons are trying to dox and take her out
Yeah thats a smart move
Why hasnt Fuentes disclosed?
Yeah thats a smart move
Why hasnt Fuentes disclosed?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:36 am to lurking
quote:
She didn’t disclose it is the point. Why didn’t she?
She did. She started working there last month, and here we are this month and it's disclosed. That's not quick enough for your schedule?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:36 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Why hasnt Fuentes disclosed?
That's (D)ifferent.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:37 am to SDVTiger
So weird and completely organic all the people who have the problem in this thread are always the ones who scream at others for not criticizing Trump. Bet if data republican were on their side they wouldn’t be complaining but since the account is pro maga that’s the issue.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:39 am to Ingeniero
quote:
For some reason I don't feel like y'all are this discerning when someone posts an article from NYT, WSJ, etc.
That’s because you’re a moron. We can point out the inaccuracies in those stories. That was the question. It’s not difficult. Try to keep up.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:41 am to DeBoar
quote:
That's (D)ifferent
quote:
So weird and completely organic all the people who have the problem in this thread are always the ones who scream at others for not criticizing Trump. Bet if data republican were on their side they wouldn’t be complaining but since the account is pro maga that’s the issue
Yup. And the sources HamasBunk is using are both paid propagandists
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:42 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
She did. She started working there last month, and here we are this month and it's disclosed.
She didn’t disclose based on her own good will and desire for transparency. She got exposed and didn’t have a choice.
You understand the difference, right?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:44 am to DeBoar
The issue is not the account is pro MAGA. The issue is the account is an undisclosed arm of the federal government.
Don’t be a fricking hypocrite.
Don’t be a fricking hypocrite.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:44 am to lurking
Okay so has Fuentes came out? Wasn’t that your original rebuttal to this whole thing?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:47 am to lurking
quote:
She didn’t disclose based on her own good will and desire for transparency. She got exposed and didn’t have a choice.
You understand the difference, right?
You sure that's what happened?
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News