- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fun new influencer drama re: DataRepublican.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:17 am
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:17 am
So, it turns out she was on the Dept of War payroll. This came out because someone was trying to feed her a story, but she thought it was a deep state setup.


Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:19 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
So, it turns out she was on the Dept of War payroll.
Was she any less accurate because she was employed by DOW?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:21 am to idlewatcher
People are saying that makes her a paid propagandist.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:23 am to Bunk Moreland
Joseph Goerbbels is loving this era.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:25 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
People are saying that makes her a paid propagandist
Which people? And as the previous poster asked, please identify the inaccuracies.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:26 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
So, it turns out she was on the Dept of War payroll.
Since a month ago?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:26 am to Bunk Moreland
~no one fricking cares~
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:29 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
People are saying that makes her a paid propagandist.
I can completely see that argument, but my argument still stands. Did it make her any less accurate in what she has posted? IMO it does not.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:29 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
People are saying that makes her a paid propagandist.
Funny.
Wonder what their opinions have been regarding Trump "whistleblowers"?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:32 am to Bunk Moreland
Don't care. DataRepublican reports truth, and only truth. This changes nothing.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:36 am to Bunk Moreland
When are you gonna care about the Democrats propaganda in corporate media?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:36 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
People are saying that makes her a paid propagandist
“People” as in the never Trump leftist coalition
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:40 am to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
And as the previous poster asked, please identify the inaccuracies.
For some reason I don't feel like y'all are this discerning when someone posts an article from NYT, WSJ, etc.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:41 am to Bunk Moreland
I thought libtards love whistleblowers
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:42 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Did it make her any less accurate in what she has posted? IMO it does not.
Agreed
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:54 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
This changes nothing.
Other than to continue to erode the facade of “independent” journalism.
Why didn’t she disclose this back in June?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:56 am to Bunk Moreland
Should have paid her via NGO and it would be all cool then.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 7:57 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Was she any less accurate because she was employed by DOW?
All she does is churn out AI slop.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:01 am to Bunk Moreland
This is the world that extremely online people live in and worry about. Meanwhile normal people go on with their lives
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:03 am to jlnoles79
She did good work leading up to the elections. Very deep insights into polling and errors. I hadn't looked at her feed since then until this thread popped up but you can tell which posts are "directed" now. It doesn't make anything she's saying inaccurate but it's slimy to not disclose that she's being paid to post them.
Popular
Back to top

22










