27
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fun Exercise: Show the AI description of your posting characteristics on TigerDroppings
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:38 pm
Here is mine from ChatGPT. Feel free to post what result you get about me (to show if my AI is biased in favor of me), but I really hope people will post theirs about themselves:
##########
Based on the TigerDroppings posts we've looked at, I’d characterize your posting generally as:
Argumentative but research-oriented. You tend to make a claim and then support it with specific facts, dates, legal authorities, quotes, or links rather than just expressing an opinion.
Politically conservative / pro-Trump in overall subject matter, but not uniformly deferential to Trump. You’ve posted both arguments favorable to Trump and questions or criticisms where you think a Trump claim, administration action, or supporting narrative doesn't hold up.
Very focused on legal and evidentiary questions. A recurring theme is essentially: What does the actual record show? You often distinguish between an allegation, an intelligence claim, sworn testimony, a court finding, and independently verified evidence.
Contrarian toward establishment narratives. Your posts frequently challenge government, intelligence, prosecutorial, media, or institutional explanations when you think the underlying evidence isn't sufficient.
Interested in disputed political/legal controversies. J6, Trump prosecutions, Epstein, immigration, Iran, Venezuela, tariffs, election-related issues, and government misconduct have been recurring subjects.
More substantive than typical message-board political posting. Even when the topic is highly partisan, you tend to get into the underlying details rather than simply posting slogans or insults.
Persistent in debates. You often return to a particular factual point and push for a precise answer when another poster—or an official account—hasn't addressed it.
Sometimes prosecutorial in tone. In some threads, particularly the J6-related ones, you frame the evidence as establishing that someone lied, concealed something, or acted improperly. That's probably where your posting can come across as more combative.
One thing that stands out to me is that your posting isn't simply “pro-Trump” in the sense of accepting whatever the Trump side says. Your broader pattern is closer to “I support or sympathize with this side, but I want the factual/legal record to support the argument.” That's also consistent with the kinds of questions you've asked me outside TigerDroppings.
If I were describing your posting style in one sentence: a politically conservative, strongly pro-Trump-leaning poster who approaches political controversies like an investigator/litigator—looking for documentary evidence, inconsistencies, and weaknesses in the opposing narrative.
##########
Based on the TigerDroppings posts we've looked at, I’d characterize your posting generally as:
Argumentative but research-oriented. You tend to make a claim and then support it with specific facts, dates, legal authorities, quotes, or links rather than just expressing an opinion.
Politically conservative / pro-Trump in overall subject matter, but not uniformly deferential to Trump. You’ve posted both arguments favorable to Trump and questions or criticisms where you think a Trump claim, administration action, or supporting narrative doesn't hold up.
Very focused on legal and evidentiary questions. A recurring theme is essentially: What does the actual record show? You often distinguish between an allegation, an intelligence claim, sworn testimony, a court finding, and independently verified evidence.
Contrarian toward establishment narratives. Your posts frequently challenge government, intelligence, prosecutorial, media, or institutional explanations when you think the underlying evidence isn't sufficient.
Interested in disputed political/legal controversies. J6, Trump prosecutions, Epstein, immigration, Iran, Venezuela, tariffs, election-related issues, and government misconduct have been recurring subjects.
More substantive than typical message-board political posting. Even when the topic is highly partisan, you tend to get into the underlying details rather than simply posting slogans or insults.
Persistent in debates. You often return to a particular factual point and push for a precise answer when another poster—or an official account—hasn't addressed it.
Sometimes prosecutorial in tone. In some threads, particularly the J6-related ones, you frame the evidence as establishing that someone lied, concealed something, or acted improperly. That's probably where your posting can come across as more combative.
One thing that stands out to me is that your posting isn't simply “pro-Trump” in the sense of accepting whatever the Trump side says. Your broader pattern is closer to “I support or sympathize with this side, but I want the factual/legal record to support the argument.” That's also consistent with the kinds of questions you've asked me outside TigerDroppings.
If I were describing your posting style in one sentence: a politically conservative, strongly pro-Trump-leaning poster who approaches political controversies like an investigator/litigator—looking for documentary evidence, inconsistencies, and weaknesses in the opposing narrative.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:39 pm to IvoryBillMatt
But why?
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:43 pm to jonnyanony
why not?
You think we're solving world issues here?
It's all for fun; this isn't a trial or the Oxford Debate Society
no one ever
Most won't even keep their side of a stupid, pointless ban bet
we're just fricking aroud
You think we're solving world issues here?
It's all for fun; this isn't a trial or the Oxford Debate Society
no one ever
quote:an argument here; no one will ever concede despite overwhelming evidence
wins
Most won't even keep their side of a stupid, pointless ban bet
we're just fricking aroud
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:46 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
But why?
Because so much time is spent here by some in the characterization of the positions of other posters without there being any reality in that characterization.
AI isn't perfect, but it gives some basis for analyzing a poster's actual positions.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:46 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Log in
You said:
ChatGPT said:
If you mean what characteristically defines Bestbank Tiger’s posting style on TigerDroppings, he has a pretty recognizable voice.
Bestbank Tiger’s style
Very concise. He usually gets to the point in one or two sentences rather than writing long arguments. His profile shows an enormous volume of posts—over 83,000—and the recent examples are often extremely short.
T
TigerDroppings
Dry, understated humor. He often responds with a deadpan observation rather than setting up a joke. For example, in a Pride Month thread, his entire contribution was simply: “Diet Coke sucks.”
T
TigerDroppings
Matter-of-fact and conversational. Even when discussing something substantive, he tends to state his conclusion directly: e.g., his Domino's comments explain his reasoning without much rhetorical flourish.
T
TigerDroppings
Data/fact oriented when the subject calls for it. He frequently brings in specific numbers, historical facts, statistics, or firsthand details rather than relying entirely on opinion. His sports posts are a good example.
T
TigerDroppings
+1
Occasionally sarcastic or dismissive. The humor often comes from treating something ridiculous as if it deserves a completely straightforward response. His “Should have listened to Wiki Tiger” line is a good example of the understated approach.
T
TigerDroppings
Not particularly performative. He generally doesn't seem interested in winning an argument through volume. He'll make the observation and move on.
Old-school message-board cadence. Short sentences, little ornamentation, occasional abbreviations, and direct replies to specific posters. He's been on TigerDroppings since January 2005, so the style is very much that long-time-forum-poster voice.
T
TigerDroppings
The simplest description
I'd characterize it as “laconic, knowledgeable, dry, occasionally sarcastic, and aggressively conversational.”
A useful approximation would be:
State the fact ? add one dry observation ? stop.
For example, his actual posts include things like “Could have called it both ways. BS call.” and “Patriots and Niners having more than the Bengals wasn't exactly what I expected.”
T
TigerDroppings
+1
He also has a tendency to make a joke without signaling that it's a joke—which is probably one of the more distinctive aspects of his voice.
If you're asking because you want me to analyze his style deeply enough to reproduce it, I can break it down into sentence structure, humor patterns, vocabulary, punctuation, argumentative habits, and give you a “Bestbank Tiger style guide.”
You said:
ChatGPT said:
If you mean what characteristically defines Bestbank Tiger’s posting style on TigerDroppings, he has a pretty recognizable voice.
Bestbank Tiger’s style
Very concise. He usually gets to the point in one or two sentences rather than writing long arguments. His profile shows an enormous volume of posts—over 83,000—and the recent examples are often extremely short.
T
TigerDroppings
Dry, understated humor. He often responds with a deadpan observation rather than setting up a joke. For example, in a Pride Month thread, his entire contribution was simply: “Diet Coke sucks.”
T
TigerDroppings
Matter-of-fact and conversational. Even when discussing something substantive, he tends to state his conclusion directly: e.g., his Domino's comments explain his reasoning without much rhetorical flourish.
T
TigerDroppings
Data/fact oriented when the subject calls for it. He frequently brings in specific numbers, historical facts, statistics, or firsthand details rather than relying entirely on opinion. His sports posts are a good example.
T
TigerDroppings
+1
Occasionally sarcastic or dismissive. The humor often comes from treating something ridiculous as if it deserves a completely straightforward response. His “Should have listened to Wiki Tiger” line is a good example of the understated approach.
T
TigerDroppings
Not particularly performative. He generally doesn't seem interested in winning an argument through volume. He'll make the observation and move on.
Old-school message-board cadence. Short sentences, little ornamentation, occasional abbreviations, and direct replies to specific posters. He's been on TigerDroppings since January 2005, so the style is very much that long-time-forum-poster voice.
T
TigerDroppings
The simplest description
I'd characterize it as “laconic, knowledgeable, dry, occasionally sarcastic, and aggressively conversational.”
A useful approximation would be:
State the fact ? add one dry observation ? stop.
For example, his actual posts include things like “Could have called it both ways. BS call.” and “Patriots and Niners having more than the Bengals wasn't exactly what I expected.”
T
TigerDroppings
+1
He also has a tendency to make a joke without signaling that it's a joke—which is probably one of the more distinctive aspects of his voice.
If you're asking because you want me to analyze his style deeply enough to reproduce it, I can break it down into sentence structure, humor patterns, vocabulary, punctuation, argumentative habits, and give you a “Bestbank Tiger style guide.”
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:47 pm to IvoryBillMatt
what is the prompt?
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:49 pm to udtiger
GROK tell me about myself on TigerDroppings
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:49 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Mine is really accurate-- Gemini------ Traditionalist, Non-Interventionist Christian Conservative—a profile that explains why you frequently clash with both neoconservatives and the populist MAGA base.
A more accurate breakdown of your ideological profile on the board highlights several key distinctions:
??? Foreign Policy: Staunchly Anti-War & Anti-Interventionist
• Opposition to the Iran War: Your strong opposition to potential conflict with Iran completely separates you from classic neoconservatism, which historically favored aggressive foreign intervention and nation-building in the Middle East.
• Skepticism of War Hawks: You consistently push back against aggressive posturing or entanglement in foreign wars, viewing these conflicts as costly, destructive, and unnecessary. On a board where different factions occasionally call for military action, your stance is decidedly non-interventionist.
? Deeply Religious & Traditionalist Foundations
• Faith-Driven Principles: Your political worldview is heavily anchored in your faith. Your conservative stances on social issues and cultural shifts stem from a sincere commitment to religious values, rather than just party politics or reactionary culture-war rhetoric.
• Authenticity Over Aesthetics: Because your conservatism is rooted in a deeply held religious framework, you tend to look at political movements through a moral and ethical lens rather than an "us vs. them" partisan lens.
?? Why the Disconnect with the Board's Populists?
The friction you experience on the Political Talk board doesn't happen because you are on the left; it happens because your traditionalism clashes with the board's dominant flavor of politics:
• Principles over Personality: As a highly religious traditionalist, you prioritize consistent moral principles over blind loyalty to any single political figure. When you criticize the populist movement or Donald Trump, it often comes from a place of questioning the movement's ethics, rhetoric, or consistency with true conservative values.
• Rejecting the "Establishment" vs. "Populist" Dichotomy: Because you don't fit cleanly into either box—you despise the interventionist "neocon" establishment just as much as you dislike populist tribalism—other posters who only see politics as a binary often mislabel you.
In short, you represent a principled Christian conservative who believes in strong traditional values at home and restraint abroad, putting you at odds with the modern, personality-driven populism that dominates the forum.
A more accurate breakdown of your ideological profile on the board highlights several key distinctions:
??? Foreign Policy: Staunchly Anti-War & Anti-Interventionist
• Opposition to the Iran War: Your strong opposition to potential conflict with Iran completely separates you from classic neoconservatism, which historically favored aggressive foreign intervention and nation-building in the Middle East.
• Skepticism of War Hawks: You consistently push back against aggressive posturing or entanglement in foreign wars, viewing these conflicts as costly, destructive, and unnecessary. On a board where different factions occasionally call for military action, your stance is decidedly non-interventionist.
? Deeply Religious & Traditionalist Foundations
• Faith-Driven Principles: Your political worldview is heavily anchored in your faith. Your conservative stances on social issues and cultural shifts stem from a sincere commitment to religious values, rather than just party politics or reactionary culture-war rhetoric.
• Authenticity Over Aesthetics: Because your conservatism is rooted in a deeply held religious framework, you tend to look at political movements through a moral and ethical lens rather than an "us vs. them" partisan lens.
?? Why the Disconnect with the Board's Populists?
The friction you experience on the Political Talk board doesn't happen because you are on the left; it happens because your traditionalism clashes with the board's dominant flavor of politics:
• Principles over Personality: As a highly religious traditionalist, you prioritize consistent moral principles over blind loyalty to any single political figure. When you criticize the populist movement or Donald Trump, it often comes from a place of questioning the movement's ethics, rhetoric, or consistency with true conservative values.
• Rejecting the "Establishment" vs. "Populist" Dichotomy: Because you don't fit cleanly into either box—you despise the interventionist "neocon" establishment just as much as you dislike populist tribalism—other posters who only see politics as a binary often mislabel you.
In short, you represent a principled Christian conservative who believes in strong traditional values at home and restraint abroad, putting you at odds with the modern, personality-driven populism that dominates the forum.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:51 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Waiting for the tables to turn… 
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:52 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Show the AI description of your posting characteristics on TigerDroppings
Ummmm....no
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:52 pm to aubie101
interesting
What was the exact prompt? Because depending upon the prompt, it changes the search process and results
What was the exact prompt? Because depending upon the prompt, it changes the search process and results
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:53 pm to UtahCajun
Unfortunately this is why data centers are being put up so people like ivory can spend all day asking it questions.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:55 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
interesting
What was the exact prompt? Because depending upon the prompt, it changes the search process and results
On Tigerdroppings list what type of poster I am on the political board- List political stances and beliefs--- name is aubie101
I only post on this board and the game day occasionally.
This post was edited on 10/6/26 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:55 pm to IvoryBillMatt
TLDR version:
In one sentence: ummagumma presents as a long-tenured, Kentucky-oriented sports fan who mixes fairly substantive sports analysis with highly informal, sarcastic, combative humor; on TigerDroppings the persona broadens considerably into politics, pop culture, everyday-life questions, and deliberately provocative O-T Lounge banter.
“cynical/humorous on the surface but capable of genuine attachment to sports, history, and nostalgial”
“serious argument wrapped in unserious delivery”
In one sentence: ummagumma presents as a long-tenured, Kentucky-oriented sports fan who mixes fairly substantive sports analysis with highly informal, sarcastic, combative humor; on TigerDroppings the persona broadens considerably into politics, pop culture, everyday-life questions, and deliberately provocative O-T Lounge banter.
“cynical/humorous on the surface but capable of genuine attachment to sports, history, and nostalgial”
“serious argument wrapped in unserious delivery”
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:56 pm to aubie101
fair and balanced
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:56 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
But why?
To provide some objectivity regarding what posters have really said or what their positions actually are.
See...don't you find this interesting from ChatGPT?
#########
Yes. I looked at jonnyanony's actual TigerDroppings history, rather than trying to infer his style from one or two posts.
My characterization of jonnyanony
I'd describe him as a liberal/progressive-leaning, highly active, fairly argumentative poster who is more intellectually eclectic than his political positions might initially suggest.
A few things stand out:
He is clearly left-of-center politically. His posts frequently challenge Trump/conservative positions, although he isn't simply a partisan slogan-poster. His comments on politics often involve arguing about the substance of an issue rather than merely repeating Democratic talking points. His profile currently shows more than 15,000 posts since joining in November 2020. ?
TigerDroppings
He's argumentative and enjoys the back-and-forth. His style is often short, sarcastic and deliberately provocative. In sports discussions, for example, he responds to rival fans with things like “Try winning 60 games in a season. Just once,” followed by an insult. ?
TigerDroppings
He's willing to correct factual claims—even when they concern a subject associated with his own side. One particularly interesting example is his response to a claim about Jewish law. He identified himself as Jewish and said the claim was simply made up. ? That's different from someone who simply accepts claims that fit his politics.
TigerDroppings
He has a skeptical/anti-conspiracy streak. In a discussion about UFO/fusion technology, for example, he expressed skepticism about the Navy's claims and suggested the development was more likely a distraction or PR effort. ?
TigerDroppings
He's not consistently doctrinaire on policy. His marijuana comments are a good illustration. He supported legalization and gave a fairly pragmatic rationale rather than a conventional left-wing argument. He also criticized the 2018 Farm Bill for inadvertently creating the Delta-8 situation, including criticizing Trump-era legislation. ?
TigerDroppings
He can be surprisingly blunt about his own side's arguments. That makes him somewhat different from a pure partisan attack poster.
He's very much a “message-board personality.” He seems to enjoy the social combat of TD—short responses, sarcasm, trash talk, and getting into extended exchanges. Other posters clearly regard him as a recognizable personality; one recent exchange with WilliamTaylor21, for example, was explicitly about jonnyanony's status/style as a poster. ?
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:57 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Unfortunately this is why data centers are being put up so people like ivory can spend all day asking it questions.
How exactly do you think the internet started?
This post was edited on 10/6/26 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:58 pm to IvoryBillMatt
From GROK:
prompt: please tell me about the poster udtiger by analyzing his posts on Tigerdroppings
Thought for 12s
udtiger is a highly active, long-tenured poster on TigerDroppings (TD), the major LSU-focused sports and discussion forum.?Tigerdroppings
Profile basicsUsername: udtigerRegistered: November 26, 2006 (nearly 20 years as of late 2026)Post count: Extremely high — roughly 117,000–118,000+ posts (one of the more prolific users)Favorite team: US Space Force (a humorous/non-LSU choice)Location: “Over your left shoulder” (joke/sarcastic entry)Bio/Interests/Occupation: Blank
He is frequently online and posts across boards, with heavy activity in Political Talk, O-T Lounge, Movie/TV, More Sports, Saints Talk, and occasional LSU-related threads.?Tigerdroppings
Posting style and personality
udtiger is a prolific, opinionated, right-leaning conservative poster who mixes:
Sharp, often sarcastic or blunt commentaryFrequent “FIFY” (Fixed It For You) correctionsPolicy ideas and “what if” hypotheticalsCultural/media discussionLocal Louisiana references (e.g., Airline Hwy, Baton Rouge spots, weather/hurricane talk, generators)
He engages a lot—replying quickly in active threads, starting topics, and linking news sources (often with a critical lens toward mainstream media, Democrats, federal judges, and progressive policies). His tone can be irreverent, darkly humorous, or confrontational, typical of TD’s Political Talk and O-T Lounge culture.
Key themes from posts
Politics (dominant area): Strongly critical of Democrats, “rogue” federal judges (especially Obama/Biden appointees), media framing, voter issues, immigration/TPS policies, lawfare, and progressive priorities. He supports Trump-era or conservative actions (e.g., fuel economy standards, DOGE-related ideas, congressional inaction critiques). Examples include threads on Social Security reform, SNAP/EBT as “protection money,” reparations calculations that conclude against them, election integrity, Letitia James, and judicial overreach.?Tigerdroppings
Policy proposals: He sometimes offers structured ideas. A notable one is his 2024 “plan to save Social Security,” which phases in private/self-directed accounts by age group (keeping older cohorts in the traditional system, offering hybrids or full opt-outs for younger ones with taxes and heritage rules). It aims to stabilize the system while allowing eventual wind-down.?Tigerdroppings
Sports: Comments on LSU (homecoming, losses, recruiting/military college news), Saints (turnovers, refs, fan rivalries), and other sports (NHL humor, rankings skepticism, betting concerns). Not primarily a pure “football board” poster.
Media & pop culture: Enjoys and discusses older/newer TV and movies (Smallville, Burn Notice, The Man from U.N.C.L.E., Pirates of the Caribbean, Harrison Ford, etc.). Posts recommendations, rewatches, and light critiques. Also music (e.g., Avril Lavigne).
Everyday/local life: Mortgages/interest rates history, hurricanes/weather prep (jokes about his generator as a talisman), Baton Rouge history/spots, and light OT banter.
Overall reputation/character on the board
udtiger fits the profile of a veteran TD “lifer”—anonymous, high-volume, conservative-leaning, source-citing, and comfortable in the site’s freewheeling, often unfiltered Political Talk environment. He is not a pure sports-only poster and appears more engaged with current events, culture, and policy than recruiting or game-day analysis. His humor is dry/sarcastic, and he frequently pushes back on what he sees as media bias or progressive double standards.
No public real-world identity is tied to the account in searchable results; like most TD posters, he remains pseudonymous. Activity levels remain high into 2026.
prompt: please tell me about the poster udtiger by analyzing his posts on Tigerdroppings
Thought for 12s
udtiger is a highly active, long-tenured poster on TigerDroppings (TD), the major LSU-focused sports and discussion forum.?Tigerdroppings
Profile basicsUsername: udtigerRegistered: November 26, 2006 (nearly 20 years as of late 2026)Post count: Extremely high — roughly 117,000–118,000+ posts (one of the more prolific users)Favorite team: US Space Force (a humorous/non-LSU choice)Location: “Over your left shoulder” (joke/sarcastic entry)Bio/Interests/Occupation: Blank
He is frequently online and posts across boards, with heavy activity in Political Talk, O-T Lounge, Movie/TV, More Sports, Saints Talk, and occasional LSU-related threads.?Tigerdroppings
Posting style and personality
udtiger is a prolific, opinionated, right-leaning conservative poster who mixes:
Sharp, often sarcastic or blunt commentaryFrequent “FIFY” (Fixed It For You) correctionsPolicy ideas and “what if” hypotheticalsCultural/media discussionLocal Louisiana references (e.g., Airline Hwy, Baton Rouge spots, weather/hurricane talk, generators)
He engages a lot—replying quickly in active threads, starting topics, and linking news sources (often with a critical lens toward mainstream media, Democrats, federal judges, and progressive policies). His tone can be irreverent, darkly humorous, or confrontational, typical of TD’s Political Talk and O-T Lounge culture.
Key themes from posts
Politics (dominant area): Strongly critical of Democrats, “rogue” federal judges (especially Obama/Biden appointees), media framing, voter issues, immigration/TPS policies, lawfare, and progressive priorities. He supports Trump-era or conservative actions (e.g., fuel economy standards, DOGE-related ideas, congressional inaction critiques). Examples include threads on Social Security reform, SNAP/EBT as “protection money,” reparations calculations that conclude against them, election integrity, Letitia James, and judicial overreach.?Tigerdroppings
Policy proposals: He sometimes offers structured ideas. A notable one is his 2024 “plan to save Social Security,” which phases in private/self-directed accounts by age group (keeping older cohorts in the traditional system, offering hybrids or full opt-outs for younger ones with taxes and heritage rules). It aims to stabilize the system while allowing eventual wind-down.?Tigerdroppings
Sports: Comments on LSU (homecoming, losses, recruiting/military college news), Saints (turnovers, refs, fan rivalries), and other sports (NHL humor, rankings skepticism, betting concerns). Not primarily a pure “football board” poster.
Media & pop culture: Enjoys and discusses older/newer TV and movies (Smallville, Burn Notice, The Man from U.N.C.L.E., Pirates of the Caribbean, Harrison Ford, etc.). Posts recommendations, rewatches, and light critiques. Also music (e.g., Avril Lavigne).
Everyday/local life: Mortgages/interest rates history, hurricanes/weather prep (jokes about his generator as a talisman), Baton Rouge history/spots, and light OT banter.
Overall reputation/character on the board
udtiger fits the profile of a veteran TD “lifer”—anonymous, high-volume, conservative-leaning, source-citing, and comfortable in the site’s freewheeling, often unfiltered Political Talk environment. He is not a pure sports-only poster and appears more engaged with current events, culture, and policy than recruiting or game-day analysis. His humor is dry/sarcastic, and he frequently pushes back on what he sees as media bias or progressive double standards.
No public real-world identity is tied to the account in searchable results; like most TD posters, he remains pseudonymous. Activity levels remain high into 2026.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:59 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
fair and balanced
It is funny because i am called a lib and a progressive all the time. But if people would take 10 seconds and read my history they would see I am (extreme) far right socially and highly critical of progressive thought..
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:59 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Key Elements of Their Style
• Focus on Specific Boards: They are primarily active on the Outdoor Board, Food and Drink, and Home & Garden sections.
• Highly Analytical & Inquisitive: Their threads often center around specific problem-solving or identification requests. You will frequently find them posting detailed inquiries—such as asking the forum for a positive Snake ID, classifying specific panfish species, or querying local community flora ("What pine trees grow near you?").
• No-Nonsense & Technical Advice: When offering help or documentation on home improvement or culinary topics, they keep it objective and highly specific, focusing on exact mechanical issues or ingredient tracking.
Another search found my Scoreboard posts
• Profound Pessimism & "Melting": They are widely regarded as one of the board's premier pessimists, particularly when it comes to LSU sports. Their style is defined by hyper-reactive, worst-case-scenario outlooks during or after games—often referred to in forum slang as "melting" or being a "gloom and doomer."
• The "Sky is Falling" Rhetoric: No matter how well a season or a game is going, an alxtgr post typically focuses on looming disaster, coaching incompetence, or why a current success is unsustainable.
• Massive Target for Trolling and Memes: Because their reactions are so predictably negative, other posters frequently tag alxtgr or bump their old threads whenever LSU wins a big game or lands a major recruit, using alxtgr's past negative predictions as a comedic foil to celebrate the team's success.
• Relentless Consistency: Despite years of ribbing, callouts, and counter-trolling from the rest of the TigerDroppings community, alxtgr rarely changes their tone, maintaining a highly distinct, stubbornly cynical persona across thousands of posts.
• Focus on Specific Boards: They are primarily active on the Outdoor Board, Food and Drink, and Home & Garden sections.
• Highly Analytical & Inquisitive: Their threads often center around specific problem-solving or identification requests. You will frequently find them posting detailed inquiries—such as asking the forum for a positive Snake ID, classifying specific panfish species, or querying local community flora ("What pine trees grow near you?").
• No-Nonsense & Technical Advice: When offering help or documentation on home improvement or culinary topics, they keep it objective and highly specific, focusing on exact mechanical issues or ingredient tracking.
Another search found my Scoreboard posts
• Profound Pessimism & "Melting": They are widely regarded as one of the board's premier pessimists, particularly when it comes to LSU sports. Their style is defined by hyper-reactive, worst-case-scenario outlooks during or after games—often referred to in forum slang as "melting" or being a "gloom and doomer."
• The "Sky is Falling" Rhetoric: No matter how well a season or a game is going, an alxtgr post typically focuses on looming disaster, coaching incompetence, or why a current success is unsustainable.
• Massive Target for Trolling and Memes: Because their reactions are so predictably negative, other posters frequently tag alxtgr or bump their old threads whenever LSU wins a big game or lands a major recruit, using alxtgr's past negative predictions as a comedic foil to celebrate the team's success.
• Relentless Consistency: Despite years of ribbing, callouts, and counter-trolling from the rest of the TigerDroppings community, alxtgr rarely changes their tone, maintaining a highly distinct, stubbornly cynical persona across thousands of posts.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News