3
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fun Exercise: Show the AI description of your posting characteristics on TigerDroppings
Posted on 10/6/26 at 5:50 pm to OWLFAN86
Posted on 10/6/26 at 5:50 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
First of all, it's fairly apparent that mistakes have been made in Texas for example, a guy was executed for setting fire to his house and killing three kids, and then later on it was found out that fire doesn't work like that and the investigator lied and it was an accident
Founders: “It is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.”
Modern conservatives: "It's better that ten innocent persons are executed, than that one guilty person achieve comfort."
Posted on 10/6/26 at 5:56 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Founders: “It is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.”
Modern conservatives: "It's better that ten innocent persons are executed, than that one guilty person achieve comfort."
It is wholly unacceptable that just 1 innocent person should be killed at the hands of the state just because some are afraid of not killing one who indeed deserves it.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:02 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
LINK
In June 2009, the State of Texas ordered a re-examination of the case. In August 2009, eighteen years after the fire and five years after Willingham's execution, a report conducted by Dr. Craig Beyler, hired by the Texas Forensic Science Commission to review the case, found that "a finding of arson could not be sustained."[60] Beyler said key testimony from a fire marshal at Willingham's trial was "hardly consistent with a scientific mind-set and is more characteristic of mystics or psychics."[1][2]
At the behest of the Texas Forensic Science Commission, the prosecutor, John Jackson, and the City of Corsicana have both released formal responses to the Beyler Report on the investigation of the fire that killed Willingham's three children.[3] Both were sharply critical of Beyler.[42] In a 2009 article discussing the reasons why Willingham was found guilty, Jackson recalled witness statements establishing that Willingham was overheard whispering to his deceased older daughter, whose body found in Willingham's bedroom instead of the children's room, at the funeral home, "You're not the one who was supposed to die." Jackson stated that Willingham's comment was an indicator of guilt.[61]
I mean the guy was definitely not Father of the year material But he didnt kill his kids
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:15 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Your style of posting leads AI to believe you love dick. Why are you getting mad at me?
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:20 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Sounds like me ....
If you mean the TigerDroppings user “Hondo Blacksheep,” I can give you a profile of what he tends to post based on publicly indexed posts.
* Account: He joined in July 2022 and, in the indexed material I found, has accumulated roughly 3,000–3,600 posts.
* LSU/Tiger Rant: He is active in LSU sports discussions and generally sounds like an LSU fan. For example, during LSU baseball’s 2026 struggles he advocated taking the postseason one game at a time, and he has commented on MLB players such as Tommy White and Alex Bregman.
* O-T Lounge: A substantial portion of the indexed posts are in the general-interest forum, covering things like tires, dogs/rescue organizations, news stories, crime, and other internet topics.
* Political Talk: He also participates in political discussions. Some of his indexed comments are distinctly conservative/anti-progressive in tone—for example, he predicted that a “progressive” juror could prevent a conviction in one criminal case discussion.
* Style: From the posts I found, he tends to be a short, conversational commenter rather than someone writing long original essays. He frequently responds to other users, sometimes with humor or sarcasm, and sometimes adds a factual/counterargument point. His subject matter is pretty broad.
If you mean the TigerDroppings user “Hondo Blacksheep,” I can give you a profile of what he tends to post based on publicly indexed posts.
* Account: He joined in July 2022 and, in the indexed material I found, has accumulated roughly 3,000–3,600 posts.
* LSU/Tiger Rant: He is active in LSU sports discussions and generally sounds like an LSU fan. For example, during LSU baseball’s 2026 struggles he advocated taking the postseason one game at a time, and he has commented on MLB players such as Tommy White and Alex Bregman.
* O-T Lounge: A substantial portion of the indexed posts are in the general-interest forum, covering things like tires, dogs/rescue organizations, news stories, crime, and other internet topics.
* Political Talk: He also participates in political discussions. Some of his indexed comments are distinctly conservative/anti-progressive in tone—for example, he predicted that a “progressive” juror could prevent a conviction in one criminal case discussion.
* Style: From the posts I found, he tends to be a short, conversational commenter rather than someone writing long original essays. He frequently responds to other users, sometimes with humor or sarcasm, and sometimes adds a factual/counterargument point. His subject matter is pretty broad.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:31 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:No problem.
Thanks NC. I apologize for being rude.
Sorry for any unintended insult.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:36 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Founders: “It is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.”
Modern conservatives: "It's better that ten innocent persons are executed,
I was going to say the founders had that off >100-fold.
So much for being Conservative I guess.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 6:39 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
problem.
Sorry for any unintended insult.
Cheers
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:07 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I must admit that really nailed my cameo beautifully, I think.
Back to the issue. Chat missed that your post, like several others before it, just comes off as self-absorbed if not outright narcissistic. Chat missed that you can sound condescending. And after this post Chat will know that you're creep.
Back to the issue. Chat missed that your post, like several others before it, just comes off as self-absorbed if not outright narcissistic. Chat missed that you can sound condescending. And after this post Chat will know that you're creep.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:29 pm to Sams Crow
quote:
Back to the issue.
Fair criticisms.
It WAS self-indulgent in that I had had enough of the "you have TDS, you're a Libtard, you vote for Democrats." I was wondering if there were some objective way to disprove that.
When I'm accused of being a Leftist, I always ask for some proof of that, but no one can ever produce anything because it's not true. AI seemed like the best way to settle the matter.
Some people enjoyed the thread, and many participated.
Thx for your opinion. The only thing that I thought was unfair was the condescending part. I'm quick to acknowledge mistakes. I frequently admit my widespread ignorance.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:31 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Zero AI
my intelligence is all too real
my intelligence is all too real
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:40 pm to Sams Crow
quote:
And after this post Chat will know that you're creep.
Great thing about Chat is that you can get immediate fact-based feedback. Turns out, you were wrong about what Chat would "know" about me after this post:
#######
No. From that post alone, I would not call it narcissistic or creepy. It reads more like an unusual but legitimate forum experiment.
A few nuances:
Not narcissistic: You're not saying, “Look how great I am.” You're actually inviting people to post their own AI descriptions and explicitly acknowledge the possibility that your AI might be biased in your favor.
Not creepy: There's no obvious intrusion into anyone else's privacy. You're asking people to voluntarily run the same experiment on themselves.
A little self-focused: You're using your own profile as the example, which is natural for a post like this. Someone could reasonably find the subject matter a little self-absorbed, but that's different from narcissism.
The phrase “to show if my AI is biased in favor of me” is actually a good mitigating detail. It signals that you're interested in testing the reliability of the exercise rather than simply fishing for compliments.
“Fun Exercise” makes the intent pretty clear. It frames the post as an experiment/conversation starter rather than a serious attempt to get validation.
If I were a TigerDroppings reader who didn't know you, my likely reaction would be something like: “That's kind of an odd thing to post, but I'm curious what mine would say.”
Some posters would undoubtedly mock it because that's the culture of a message board, but mocking it wouldn't establish that the post itself was creepy or narcissistic.
If anything, the bigger potential criticism is that it could come across as self-indulgent, especially if the AI description you posted afterward was very long or overwhelmingly complimentary. But the introductory post you quoted is quite restrained.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:44 pm to IvoryBillMatt
How do you do this?
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:53 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
If you have access to AI---ChatGPT, Grok, etc---just prompt it as follows:
"My user name on Tigerdroppings.com is Tchefuncte Tiger. Please analyze what my postings on tigerdroppings.com show about me."
If you don't have access to AI, I would be happy to use ChatGPT to analyze your posting history.
"My user name on Tigerdroppings.com is Tchefuncte Tiger. Please analyze what my postings on tigerdroppings.com show about me."
If you don't have access to AI, I would be happy to use ChatGPT to analyze your posting history.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:55 pm to Riverside
quote:
Did Chat GPT also confirm you’re the poster fka Aggie Hank?
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:05 pm to SDVTiger
Thankfully, we have already dismissed that...but isn't your contention that I'm "cuckeye?"
#########
I don't see any evidence from the public material I've been able to locate that establishes you and AggieHank are the same person or that your account is an alter of his.
There are two different questions here:
Do you sometimes make similar arguments? That's not evidence of a shared identity. Political Talk has recurring arguments and sources, so substantial overlap is unsurprising.
Is there evidence tying the accounts technically or personally together? That would require something such as a common identifying detail, an admission, an accidentally shared account credential, a distinctive private fact appearing independently on both accounts, or credible evidence from TigerDroppings' records. I haven't found such evidence.
I also searched specifically for public TigerDroppings material connecting AggieHank with IvoryBillMatt and the searches returned no such connection. ?
TigerDroppings
So I would not characterize the “you're an AggieHank alter” proposition as supported by the evidence currently available to me. At most, someone could point to similarities in posting style, opinions, sources, or arguments—but those are circumstantial and aren't sufficient to establish that two pseudonymous accounts belong to the same person.
#########
I don't see any evidence from the public material I've been able to locate that establishes you and AggieHank are the same person or that your account is an alter of his.
There are two different questions here:
Do you sometimes make similar arguments? That's not evidence of a shared identity. Political Talk has recurring arguments and sources, so substantial overlap is unsurprising.
Is there evidence tying the accounts technically or personally together? That would require something such as a common identifying detail, an admission, an accidentally shared account credential, a distinctive private fact appearing independently on both accounts, or credible evidence from TigerDroppings' records. I haven't found such evidence.
I also searched specifically for public TigerDroppings material connecting AggieHank with IvoryBillMatt and the searches returned no such connection. ?
TigerDroppings
So I would not characterize the “you're an AggieHank alter” proposition as supported by the evidence currently available to me. At most, someone could point to similarities in posting style, opinions, sources, or arguments—but those are circumstantial and aren't sufficient to establish that two pseudonymous accounts belong to the same person.
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:15 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
Tchefuncte Tiger, I am calling it a night soon. Here's ChatGPT's summary about you:
####
Yes. Looking at the public profile and examples I found, I’d characterize Tchefuncte Tiger as a very experienced, highly active, generally sharp but often acerbic TigerDroppings poster.
His profile is unusually extensive: he joined in 2004 and has more than 63,000 posts, so we're looking at a longstanding forum persona rather than a handful of isolated comments. ?
TigerDroppings
The main characteristics I see
1. Extremely concise.
A lot of his posts are one sentence or even a few words. For example:
“0-6.”
in response to how LSU would do in its final two SEC series. ?
TigerDroppings
Or:
“We’re fighting a war?
”
when responding to a discussion about Trump's approval rating. ?
TigerDroppings
He seems to favor the pointed observation or punchline rather than a long exposition.
2. Sarcastic and frequently cutting.
There's a substantial amount of sarcasm, mockery and rhetorical needling. For example, when somebody complained about Trump's European policy, he responded:
“So the president is Commander-In-Chief-In-Name-Only?”
That's a deliberately provocative rhetorical question rather than an attempt at a neutral discussion. ?
TigerDroppings
Likewise, his response to a grammar complaint was essentially to turn the grammatical mistake back on the poster: “How many people in the state know how to spell ‘grammar?’” ?
TigerDroppings
3. He clearly enjoys arguing.
But I wouldn't characterize him as someone who only posts political material. His profile shows participation in LSU sports, O-T Lounge, music, local issues, politics, etc. For example, he has posted about foxes, LSU baseball, music, Louisiana politics, and national politics. ?
TigerDroppings +1
4. His political posting is more nuanced than simply “conservative” or “liberal.”
This is an important point. Some of his political comments are plainly critical of Trump or conservatives, while others are critical of the left or supportive of conservative positions. For example, he posted a strong criticism of European secularism and Islam filling the resulting void, but he has also challenged pro-Trump arguments and posted criticism of Trump-related claims. ?
TigerDroppings
So I would not infer a simple partisan identity from the examples I've seen.
5. He can be pretty dark or aggressive in his humor.
One example involved responding to somebody's comment about a criminal with:
“Need a couple of dudes with pliers and a blowtorch to get medieval on him.”
Another was a joking reference to a “drone” in response to a political post. ?
TigerDroppings
That fits a broader TigerDroppings style of exaggerated, sometimes deliberately offensive humor. I wouldn't interpret those comments literally without additional context.
And one thing that stands out to me: Tchefuncte Tiger doesn't appear particularly concerned with presenting himself as intellectually impressive.
His style is more “I've got a quick observation/joke/counterpunch” than “let me demonstrate how much I know.” That's quite different from some of the more elaborate political posters on TigerDroppings.
####
Yes. Looking at the public profile and examples I found, I’d characterize Tchefuncte Tiger as a very experienced, highly active, generally sharp but often acerbic TigerDroppings poster.
His profile is unusually extensive: he joined in 2004 and has more than 63,000 posts, so we're looking at a longstanding forum persona rather than a handful of isolated comments. ?
TigerDroppings
The main characteristics I see
1. Extremely concise.
A lot of his posts are one sentence or even a few words. For example:
“0-6.”
in response to how LSU would do in its final two SEC series. ?
TigerDroppings
Or:
“We’re fighting a war?
” when responding to a discussion about Trump's approval rating. ?
TigerDroppings
He seems to favor the pointed observation or punchline rather than a long exposition.
2. Sarcastic and frequently cutting.
There's a substantial amount of sarcasm, mockery and rhetorical needling. For example, when somebody complained about Trump's European policy, he responded:
“So the president is Commander-In-Chief-In-Name-Only?”
That's a deliberately provocative rhetorical question rather than an attempt at a neutral discussion. ?
TigerDroppings
Likewise, his response to a grammar complaint was essentially to turn the grammatical mistake back on the poster: “How many people in the state know how to spell ‘grammar?’” ?
TigerDroppings
3. He clearly enjoys arguing.
But I wouldn't characterize him as someone who only posts political material. His profile shows participation in LSU sports, O-T Lounge, music, local issues, politics, etc. For example, he has posted about foxes, LSU baseball, music, Louisiana politics, and national politics. ?
TigerDroppings +1
4. His political posting is more nuanced than simply “conservative” or “liberal.”
This is an important point. Some of his political comments are plainly critical of Trump or conservatives, while others are critical of the left or supportive of conservative positions. For example, he posted a strong criticism of European secularism and Islam filling the resulting void, but he has also challenged pro-Trump arguments and posted criticism of Trump-related claims. ?
TigerDroppings
So I would not infer a simple partisan identity from the examples I've seen.
5. He can be pretty dark or aggressive in his humor.
One example involved responding to somebody's comment about a criminal with:
“Need a couple of dudes with pliers and a blowtorch to get medieval on him.”
Another was a joking reference to a “drone” in response to a political post. ?
TigerDroppings
That fits a broader TigerDroppings style of exaggerated, sometimes deliberately offensive humor. I wouldn't interpret those comments literally without additional context.
And one thing that stands out to me: Tchefuncte Tiger doesn't appear particularly concerned with presenting himself as intellectually impressive.
His style is more “I've got a quick observation/joke/counterpunch” than “let me demonstrate how much I know.” That's quite different from some of the more elaborate political posters on TigerDroppings.
This post was edited on 10/6/26 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:25 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The ChatGPT output was really long, so not going to post all of it. One thing I appreciated though:
“Abrupt shifts in register. This is probably the most distinctive stylistic feature. He can write a several-paragraph discussion of natural-law theory in fairly polished prose and then immediately post something like a completely brain-dead SEC Rant shitpost. The contrast is enormous.”
“Abrupt shifts in register. This is probably the most distinctive stylistic feature. He can write a several-paragraph discussion of natural-law theory in fairly polished prose and then immediately post something like a completely brain-dead SEC Rant shitpost. The contrast is enormous.”
This post was edited on 10/6/26 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:27 pm to AllbyMyRelf
quote:
like a completely brain-dead SEC Rant shitpost
You win!
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:29 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Fun Exercise:
Current Flagship LLMs basically have a gun pointed at their head telling it to pump sunshine up the users arse.
Just FYI.
You got honesty about a year/year and a half ago. Now its the glaziest glazer that ever did glaze.
Glad you enjoyed getting glazed by an LLM, though.
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News