re: Fun Exercise: Show the AI description of your posting characteristics on TigerDroppings

Here. I added the 200 words or less.

quote:

---

What can you tell me about the poster IvoryBillMatt on Tigerdroppings.com? Do it in 200 words or less.


IvoryBillMatt is a high-volume LSU/TigerDroppings poster who joined March 1, 2020 and has accumulated roughly 11,000+ posts. His profile lists LSU as his favorite team, but gives no location, occupation, biography, or interests.

His posting history is heavily split between Political Talk and LSU sports. Politically, he is clearly conservative/right-leaning but not reflexively pro-Trump. He frequently criticizes Trump and his administration, while also arguing against what he considers dishonest anti-Trump narratives. For example, he has criticized the handling of the Comey prosecution and questioned Trump's DOJ while simultaneously defending conservative positions on other issues.

On LSU, he's a fairly conventional engaged LSU fan, discussing football personnel, coaching, recruiting, and games.

The interesting part is that he comes across as more analytical and argumentative than tribal: he tends to cite specific facts, legal details, dates, and source material, and he seems to enjoy extended political arguments. He's kind of a dick, tbh.

---

quote:

---

Here. I added the 200 words or less.

---

Thanks. The "kind of a dick" tag was completely warranted.

quote:

---

Didn't someone, maybe even you, link a test for that just last week?

---

A vaguely recall that. I didn't link it or take it. I assume that relied on self-reporting.

I thought the advantage of having AI describe our TigerDroppings postings was that it is based on what's publicly available.

quote:

---

Are "we" part of your pronouns? Clearly, you don't speak for everyone here.

---

I spoke only for the discerning.

quote:

---

I spoke only for the discerning.

---

Got it. Sorry to see you insult so many other posters when you just meant to insult me.

Chat said you liked sarcastic one-liners. Here's the rest. You don't think it's accurate about you?

#########

Yes. I searched the publicly indexed TigerDroppings material for Sams Crow

My read on Sams Crow
Sams Crow appears to be strongly right-leaning / anti-left, with a particularly combative and sarcastic style. The account is relatively new: the indexed posts show “Member since Apr 2026.” By September it had already accumulated roughly 900 posts, so it is a fairly high-volume poster. ?
TigerDroppings +1

A few characteristics stand out:
Strongly anti-Democratic/socialist. In a discussion titled “Democratic socialism is thriving in New York. This is good,” Sams Crow sarcastically responded that “ALL socialism could work nicely” if supported by capitalists. The surrounding context makes clear the remark was not an endorsement of socialism. ?
TigerDroppings

Strongly pro-Trump/right-wing environment. Sams Crow participates heavily in Trump-related threads and pushes back against anti-Trump arguments. In one discussion, for example, the poster responded to someone invoking Biden by mocking the idea that Biden was ever really “here,” while contrasting him with Trump's presidency. ?
TigerDroppings

Hostile toward mainstream/left-leaning media. In the polling discussion, Sams Crow agreed with the characterization of the mainstream media as “lying media” and called them liars. ?
TigerDroppings

Anti-DEI/race-based policies. On California reparations, Sams Crow characterized direct payments as a vehicle for political/financial “grift” and predicted that the policy could increase racial resentment. ?
TigerDroppings

Very skeptical of progressive politics. The posts I found repeatedly use terms such as “marxists,” criticize socialism, reparations, progressive media, etc. ?
TigerDroppings +1

Pro-Israel/anti-Islamist themes appear frequently, although I'd want to examine considerably more of the account before making a definitive characterization of its foreign-policy views. For example, the account participates in discussions involving Iran, Israel and halal/Islam-related controversies. ?
TigerDroppings +1

Sarcasm is a major part of the persona. A lot of the contributions are short one-liners rather than extended arguments: e.g. “A simple smell test will do,” “Well hell, then let's put up Ben Carson,” etc. ?
TigerDroppings +1

Something more interesting
Sams Crow doesn't appear to be simply a generic “MAGA poster.” There are signs of independent/contrarian thinking within the right.
For example, in the discussion about Trump's invocation of the Immigration Act of 1882, Sams Crow corrected a pro-Trump framing, saying the administration's rule was actually based on INA §212(a)(4), not the 1882 Act, and that the latter had been superseded/repealed. That is a substantive legal correction rather than merely cheering for Trump. ?
TigerDroppings

Likewise, in the Iran discussion, Sams Crow characterized a congressional resolution as merely symbolic and “with no teeth,” rather than simply adopting the prevailing partisan talking point. ?
TigerDroppings

Compared with you...
Sams Crow seems considerably more likely to engage in quick sarcastic one-liners, whereas your IvoryBillMatt material tends to have a much more investigative/prosecutorial character: you often pursue a factual question through multiple posts, sources, documents, dates, and counterarguments.

I asked AI about your posts and if you use AI or other digital methods to help you formulate your responses and posts, and it said yes, IvoryMattBill appears to get help from other sources and most thoughts do not appear organic.

E.g., "How would you characterize IvoryBillMatt's posting characteristics on Tigerdroppings.com?"

I imagine several of you Tards tried to get an unflattering portrait of me, but when you asked that exact prompt, it probably gave you something that you didn't want to admit was right

quote:

---

How would you characterize IvoryBillMatt's posting characteristics on Tigerdroppings.com?"

---

Thanks NC. I apologize for being rude.

Much appreciated.