- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Foreperson in the Clancy trial sent a note asking for 1 juror removed
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:49 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
BREAKING: The foreperson in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial just delivered a note asking for one juror to be removed for not following the rules regarding the law's definition of reasonable doubt. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington then asked for that juror to be removed.
The prosecution, however, stated that it felt the judge's instructions to the jury were sufficient, and the existing jury is now continuing to deliberate, as instructed by the judge.
17
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:50 pm to cajunangelle
Jurors are pussies
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:51 pm to cajunangelle
Thanks. Hopelessly deadlocked, don't you think?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:52 pm to cajunangelle
A man on the jury should start saying that Clancy is hot so the women on the jury will hate her
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:53 pm to cajunangelle
this woman is going away, one way or the other. as far as I know, she will never be back in society.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:54 pm to cajunangelle
Can a lawyer opine what they think the jury has decided?
You are on retainer for tree fiddy.
You are on retainer for tree fiddy.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:55 pm to Cosmo
The three male jurors need to start talking about how hot Clancy is…there’ll be a unanimous murder one guilty verdict in short order.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:57 pm to el Gaucho
Damn.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:01 pm to cajunangelle
How would CBS news know that since the judge didn't read the note.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:01 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Jurors are pussies
Misguided assessment. Maybe that one hold out is a radical who believes no matter what she is NG.
Or could be 11 voting that way and one baw is the hold out
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:02 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
foreperson
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:02 pm to cajunangelle
Defense admits she did it.
There is no reasonable doubt.
The entire jury (except one) has failed to follow instructions.
There is no reasonable doubt.
The entire jury (except one) has failed to follow instructions.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:07 pm to cajunangelle
Does this state require 100perce t agreement for conviction
If so praying for the holdout in potential acquittal which is shameful
If so praying for the holdout in potential acquittal which is shameful
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:08 pm to udtiger
quote:There’s no reasonable doubt that she committed the killings
Defense admits she did it. There is no reasonable doubt. The entire jury (except one) has failed to follow instructions.
There is reasonable doubt as to whether or not she was insane, because Massachusetts law is retarded and puts the burden of proof on the prosecution to prove she was not insane. That’s essentially impossible to do. Best you can do is often something like an expert witness in this case that says something like “that’s not normally how insanity works”. But that’s not disproving insanity in many people’s minds beyond a reasonable doubt
Fairly certain it’s
- 9 emotional women
- 2 men who think she should be behind bars but are principled and insist on following the law as written
- 1 man going WTF
In fairness to MA I don’t think the issue stops with their retarded law - to me the more macro issue is we treat the insane differently. I guess we could keep them from getting the death penalty, but anyone who murders another should be locked in a box for the rest of their existence. The fact that this is not how society works is abhorrent to me
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:08 pm to cajunangelle
"They" better hope I'm never picked for jury duty on a case like this. No way, no how, I would EVER budge on a guilty verdict. And I'd tell those fricks all about themselves (who thought differently) every single minute. They would hate me!
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:11 pm to RemouladeSawce
quote:
Massachusetts law is retarded puts the burden of proof on the prosecution to prove she was not insane
If the father had an ounce of sack, he'd have offed her by now.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:12 pm to cajunangelle
[embed]Can a lawyer opine what they think the jury has decided?
[/embed]
Ordinarily, that would probably mean that they were 11-1 for guilt, but the fact that the defense lawyer was screaming for removal obviously means that HE thinks it's 11-1 for not guilty.
Clearly he knows more about it than we do.
[/embed]
Ordinarily, that would probably mean that they were 11-1 for guilt, but the fact that the defense lawyer was screaming for removal obviously means that HE thinks it's 11-1 for not guilty.
Clearly he knows more about it than we do.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:13 pm to cajunangelle
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
This seems like egregious juror intimidation.
The sidebar that was done publicly, singling out the apparent sole juror, is basically putting a target on that juror’s back for when they will invariably be publicly identified.
I don’t know if this is standard protocol. But it certainly seems abnormal and very dirty.
quote:
The defense did not kick the crap out of the prosecution. The defense started from the stronger position of the prosecution having to prove the murderer was sane.
He doesn't want a mistrial because the immediate tik tok craze will die down they might sequester the next jury.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:14 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Clearly he knows more about it than we do.
But he really doesn't know what the jury is thinking. We all think the same because that's a reasonable Inference. This jury might not be reasonable
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:21 pm to Warrior Court
quote:
this woman is going away, one way or the other. as far as I know, she will never be back in society.
Someone was saying that the one holdout is the only person on the jury who thinks she's guilty.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News