- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Firestorm erupts over requiring women to sign up for military draft
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:33 am to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:33 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Really? You dont see the irony of women suddenly rediscovering what women are the second the feds start conscripting them for war?
So trannies are the reason for the GOP "firestorm" over this?
1
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:37 am to RiverCityTider
Equality, Feminism, democracy, destruction of the patriarchy, equity, justice; hmmm what are some other buzz words the progressives like to use?
Anyway, boo fricking hoo! They asked for these things, TA-da’ bitch!
Anyway, boo fricking hoo! They asked for these things, TA-da’ bitch!
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:38 am to RiverCityTider
I don’t agree with this. That would have to be a second faze. Women should of course be part of our military and it should be their career decision to do so.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:39 am to DavidTheGnome
trannies are getting conscripted either way, so no. It'll be white liberal feminists who kill this idea. You and the Hill can pretend its Republicans, but people with brains (find one and ask them) know the truth. Like I said... Irony
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:40 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Mandatory national service (civil, military, certain volunteer/NGO etc., etc.) would be an absolute positive in the United States.
Not for the individuals whose combat readiness suffers due to having to train their fat, stupid asses.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:40 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Good. I don't understand why the GOP is apparently against it.
I don't know, maybe if the GOP gets vocal about this they can start gaining more of the suburban mom vote. It's a win win
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:41 am to RiverCityTider
quote:
We can send them to Ecuador with welcome baskets for all the illegals.
Who said anything about sending anyone (other than military) overseas?
This post was edited on 6/20/24 at 11:42 am
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:43 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Not for the individuals whose combat readiness suffers due to having to train their fat, stupid asses.
Such individuals would obviously not choose or be accepted into military service, hence civil service, etc.
Many, many other nations do this or similar.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:45 am to RiverCityTider
This is why I'm against women voting. They should not be voting of they don't have a stake in it. I don't want women dying on the battlefield either, but if they are going to vote, they almost have to also be willing to die in a foxhole as well to defend their right to vote.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:50 am to RiverCityTider
I'm fine with it.
Either everyone signs up, or no one does.
Either everyone signs up, or no one does.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:54 am to Big Gorilla
What about the 40-45 million illegal aliens that get more benefits than disabled US veterans?
Can we just round them all up and send them to Ukraine and the Middle East before any US citizens?
Can we just round them all up and send them to Ukraine and the Middle East before any US citizens?
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:54 am to RiverCityTider
adding female drafting is a good step towards equality.
Also defeats draft dodgers that claim to be a women
Also defeats draft dodgers that claim to be a women
Posted on 6/20/24 at 11:58 am to CharlesUFarley
quote:A few years ago this board was overall in support of a mandatory 2 years in the service. The thought was that it would shape up the basement dwelling tubs of crap and instill a sense of patriotism in a majority of them.
Don't you think the demoncrats are salivating over the possibility of a mandatory 2 year service for everyone of draft age
Posted on 6/20/24 at 12:00 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
Don't you think the demoncrats are salivating over the possibility of a mandatory 2 year service for everyone of draft age.
We don't have a system set up to handle anywhere near this many numbers.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 12:00 pm to RiverCityTider
1. If women can’t be drafted, women in congress should not be allowed to vote on any military legislation, period.
2. Any legislatures voting for war should either be sent to serve in that war, or someone in their immediate family should be a substitute for them.
It’s bullshite!t when one group of untouchables can vote to send other to war.
2. Any legislatures voting for war should either be sent to serve in that war, or someone in their immediate family should be a substitute for them.
It’s bullshite!t when one group of untouchables can vote to send other to war.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 12:01 pm to Tvilletiger
quote:
I don’t agree with this. That would have to be a second faze. Women should of course be part of our military and it should be their career decision to do so.
They wanted the right to vote and everything else to be equal to men but don't want any of the bad things. A man's life isn't a buffet where you just pick what you want
Posted on 6/20/24 at 12:03 pm to RiverCityTider
I'm actually for that. I don't understand why women that claim they want equality (even though they already have it) aren't fighting for this. Same goes with car insurance. They should be demanding to pay what men pay.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 12:04 pm to RiverCityTider
Honestly, if my sons get drafted they will identify as women. frick sending my sons to go fight some bullshite wars. This isn’t WWII. This is the military industrial complex making a dollar. I will not be complicit in that.
Posted on 6/20/24 at 1:25 pm to Night Vision
quote:
We don't have a system set up to handle anywhere near this many numbers.
Yet
Edit: That's because they haven't built the barracks at all the colleges yet.
This post was edited on 6/20/24 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 6/20/24 at 1:26 pm to TheFonz
Ratings: Minus Infinity, -25, - 50 (It's a man, so...)
Operational Ugs in front; Brainwashed / Paid photogenic young blondes in back.
************************************************************************
And, my fellow teenagers -- exactly whoooo or what has been organizing, making all these neat, professional-looking corporate signs for over a half-century?
From NOW, Black Panzers, to all Abortion Groups, BLM, to Rainbow In, to STOP OIL etal; To all their VERY organized demonstrations, sit-downs, traffic-stoppage, "peaceful" riots, city hall take-overs, rampant parades , protests, etc...
What % of cases they have been operational agitprop bullsh#t disruptions, sponsored by You-Know-Who.goob?
How can one easily tell when a "demonstration" or "public disobedience" is legit? ARRESTS ARE MADE. ZERO-TOLERANCE.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News