Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:	468
Registered on:	10/24/2023
Online Status:	Not Online

re: CNN says Big Balls is responsible

Posted by Datbawwwww on 2/7/25 at 4:28 am to SuckerPunch

This is literally the funniest thing I think I’ve ever seen! BTW, the phrase “big balls here” absolutely is hysterical!

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

Learn to code

Posted by Datbawwwww on 2/7/25 at 4:14 am

I remember when the queen killer/count ( Clinton) told Cole miners to learn to code, good luck for ordinary people, a few young men did exactly that. Now they are using skills that was advised from the left against them. It’s amazing!

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: What does Garland and Smith do once Judge Cannon rules Smith wasn't legally appointed?

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 1:08 pm to Goforit

I agree. However that will take time to work through the courts and absolutely will never be ruled upon before the election. It’s a clever tactic by the left, they seek out complicit courts, in favorable districts, to order unprecedented and unconstitutional rulings. The DC circuit is absolutely corrupt, 9th, as is the second circuit, and more.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: What does Garland and Smith do once Judge Cannon rules Smith wasn't legally appointed?

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 12:52 pm to TDTOM

What do you do for a living?

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: What does Garland and Smith do once Judge Cannon rules Smith wasn't legally appointed?

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 12:00 pm to TDTOM

I deal with litigation for a living.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: What does Garland and Smith do once Judge Cannon rules Smith wasn't legally appointed?

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 11:55 am to I20goon

I understand, the questions of Jack Smith ( or any special prosecutor for the matter) is currently being argued under merits, in her court. It’s my opinion as to how she will rule, JusticeThomas threw her a bone ( in this ruling) to help her make a very difficult decision, it’s unprecedented before the court. And I don’t think I am commingling two issues, as they are one and the same.

Are you feeling like I am including Presidential immunity into the J-6 defendants? If so, that’s my fault, I was talking about several USSC verdicts in the past two weeks that are building a frame work for her to rule. For example, they ruled that the statute Smith is prosecuting the defendants under is wrong, the have ruled a jury should be unanimous for each charge before any court, chevron plays into this for an executive overstepping their boundaries; the only reason I made mention of the immunity ruling was because of the comments Thomas made that are specific to this case. Ta’da.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: R's want to fine Garland now instead of arrest him

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 11:29 am to Night Vision

Weak.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: If elected, Trump's 2nd term would be a disaster thanks to the SC shenanigans.

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 11:26 am to BuckI

The “education” and enlightening from the left, how could Plato ever stack up! It’s almost like we have been warned about this shite for thousands of years; furthermore, we should destroy any relic of his existence….

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: Thomas to Jack Smith and Garland: You don’t have Authority

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 11:15 am to RaoulDuke504

I hear what you are saying. But it’s important that you look at the past few weeks of USSC verdicts, after the security fence was put up.there are multiple direct rulings, and some overt guidance for districts courts to follow. Just a few off the top of mind, Chevron, FDA, J-6, UNANIMOUS jury verdicts, on top of the immunity ruling. The third branch of government is pushing back, they are fed up with congress not doing their jobs, and the executive branch overstepping their authority. We are blessed to have three equal powers that govern our society.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: How soon does BR write that $200 M check to St George?

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 11:00 am to Tandemjay

This. Always fight.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: What does Garland and Smith do once Judge Cannon rules Smith wasn't legally appointed?

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 10:35 am to I20goon

I don’t understand what you’re getting at. The question is before Judge cannon currently, she has postponed her ruling until after some of the cases before the USSC ruled so she can have a guideline for an unprecedented situation. With the rulings, and specifically Judge Thomas adding that, it’s pretty clear what her next move will be.

Not only will her decision dismiss the charges against president Trump, but all J-6 defendants charged under the special council, which is unconstitutional!

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: Looks like Trump's sentencing in hush money case may be postponed

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 10:14 am to teke184

Folks forget about a separate SCOTUS decision a week or so back that mandates a unanimous verdict for every charge before any court. This decision will play into the appeal as well as the USSC ruling in the J-6 charges. It’s all adding up and all on the table.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: Anyone here read the SCOTUS ruling on Presidential immunity?

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 10:08 am to cajunangelle

He absolutely did. Overtly called out the unconstitutional appointment.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: Anyone here read the SCOTUS ruling on Presidential immunity?

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/2/24 at 8:51 am to ApexTiger

I wish Alito,s opinion was part of the ruling, I would love to read his thoughts on the matter.

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: Can Biden now arrest all MAGA supporters

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/1/24 at 12:23 pm to Revelator

They have been doing this for 4 years, they are tyrants!

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: Thomas to Jack Smith and Garland: You don’t have Authority

Posted by Datbawwwww on 7/1/24 at 10:54 am to dafif

No, I think they are tired of the executive branch overstepping there authority. We don’t need more laws, we need executive to operate within the framework of our constitutional republic.IMHO

Political Talk

Jump to Post View Topic