- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI contractor prevented from disclosing email investigation info to congress by? THE FBI
Posted on 12/14/17 at 6:48 am to Wtodd
Posted on 12/14/17 at 6:48 am to Wtodd
quote:
I'm a federal contractor and signing NDAs is SOP and we don't sign them to prevent us from talking to Congress.
But do your NDAs prevent you from responding to congressional inquiries???
2
Posted on 12/14/17 at 6:52 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
But do your NDAs prevent you from responding to congressional inquiries
Highly doubtful that a non-disclosure agreement with your employer/customer would prevent you from talking to your employer/customer. These frickers do realize the government is their employer right?
Posted on 12/14/17 at 6:56 am to ShortyRob
NDAs are supposed to include language creating exceptions related to government investigations
if they don't, they run the risk of being declared unenforceable which creates all sorts of problems for all the other information
if they don't, they run the risk of being declared unenforceable which creates all sorts of problems for all the other information
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:05 am to BobBoucher
quote:As a contractor it is not his info to give.
FBI contractor prevented from disclosing email investigation info to congress by? THE FBI
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:07 am to mmcgrath
quote:Correct. Hence . . .
As a contractor it is not his info to give.
. . . FBI contractor prevented from disclosing email investigation info to congress by? THE FBI
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:19 am to digitalis
quote:
Tell me, how many indictments and plea deals will it take before you admit Trump has a Russia problem? Mueller's just getting started and they are already MULTIPLE indicments, and guilt pleas.
#tinfoil 
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:38 am to digitalis
quote:
Tell me, how many indictments and plea deals will it take before you admit Trump has a Russia problem?
Well, first there has to be one related to Russia Collusion, as opposed to tax fraud from years ago or some other minor process crime. But hey... carry on with your happy thoughts of "Muh Russian".
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:43 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
But do your NDAs prevent you from responding to congressional inquiries???
No bc that would be illegal
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:That is interesting SFP.
NDAs are supposed to include language creating exceptions related to government investigations
if they don't, they run the risk of being declared unenforceable which creates all sorts of problems for all the other information
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:52 am to digitalis
quote:Which of those directly apply to the issue of Trump Campaign collusion?
Tell me, how many indictments and plea deals will it take before you admit Trump has a Russia problem? Mueller's just getting started and they are already MULTIPLE indicments, and guilt pleas.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:55 am to digitalis
quote:
Tell me, how many indictments and plea deals will it take before you admit Trump has a Russia problem?
None of the charges brought against anyone so far have anything to do with Trump or Russian "collusion" you get that , don't you?
quote:Nonsense, this investigation has been ongoing for 18 months now. You dont seem to understand that, a speical counsel simply takes over an existing investigation and runs it independently, the FBI was already investigating this for a year when Mueller came along.
Mueller's just getting started
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:55 am to digitalis
quote:
Mueller's just getting started
How so? A couple of media outlets reported yesterday that the investigation is wrapping up.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 9:00 am to NC_Tigah
The segment stated that the language in the NDA was highly unusual in that it explicitly prevented disclosure to congress.
I'm hoping to find more on it today, or hopefully Tucker follows up tonight.
I'm hoping to find more on it today, or hopefully Tucker follows up tonight.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 9:03 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Highly doubtful that a non-disclosure agreement with your employer/customer would prevent you from talking to your employer/customer. These frickers do realize the government is their employer right?
From what I have heard this NDA did exactly that, and I think we can all agree that we have seen evidence to suggest that many in the IC do NOT understand that they work FOR the government, which means people who are elected to oversee them.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 10:11 am to digitalis
quote:
Tell me, how many indictments and plea deals will it take before you admit Trump has a Russia problem? Mueller's just getting started and they are already MULTIPLE indicments, and guilt pleas.
"Things are not as they seem"
Posted on 12/14/17 at 10:21 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
quote:
NDAs are supposed to include language creating exceptions related to government investigations
if they don't, they run the risk of being declared unenforceable which creates all sorts of problems for all the other information
That is interesting SFP.
and true, as with any contract, if any part of the contract is illegal, the entire contract is invalid, but when that contract is WITh the FBI, how you going to fight that?
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News