- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:28 pm to TrueTiger
How can you gerrymander a presidential election?
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:29 pm to RFK
A republic, madam, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:30 pm to RFK
Downvote number 258 checking in without reading.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:30 pm to RFK
quote:
This claim is wrong because critics of the Electoral College generally understand the United States is a constitutional republic, not a pure direct democracy, and simply argue that selecting the president by national popular vote remains fully compatible with that republican framework.
I used to think the electoral college was unfair and that it needed to be changed.
I was young and stupid at the time. I grew up and grew to understand things more.
What's your excuse?
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:36 pm to RFK
You would literally have to amend the Constitution to eliminate the EC. Do you really think you can get 38 states to go along with this foolishness, let alone 2/3 of both houses of congress?
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:44 pm to RFK
If they get rid of electoral college there will be a civil war, abs a divide of the states. It can’t happen but probably will, and our children will reap the shite rewards. Very sad about long term, land owned in different states will be seized, investments will be destroyed or seized also. It’s sad but I think it’s going to happen no matter what. Such a shame what was built and is being built by the hard working is being destroyed by the ultra liberal minds.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:49 pm to RFK
Liberals and leftists are for this, frick all of that. We have problems now like the system is, with idiots on the left.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 3:00 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
but their authority ultimately comes from elections and the consent of the governed. That's a democracy.
1) in what you're saying, we could also popular vote those representatives right back out. We would just vote whether we still want them in or not, and if the popular vote says we don't, they have to leave office.
2) In a democracy we would vote on every law being passed.
We don't. "Representatives" do. Hence, republic.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 3:00 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
Assuming you got rid of winner take all, you then make sure that your state has no congressional districts (or they are outnumbered) that would go the opposite way.
California for example would have only 1 or 2 red districts vs. many blue.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 3:04 pm to cadillacattack
quote:
RFK = conman
RFK = DSA neophyte.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 3:08 pm to CSATiger
quote:
Definition of Pure Democracy: two wolves and a sheep vote on what is for supper
I love that analogy!
Posted on 8/2/26 at 3:20 pm to RFK
quote:
Pro: It would guarantee that the candidate who receives the most individual votes nationwide becomes president, more closely reflecting the direct preference of the overall electorate
In a nation that is a union of sovereign states before else, why is this a “pro”?
Posted on 8/2/26 at 3:27 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Jerrymandering makes this virtually impossible.
I saw that episode. That’s when Jerry messed up Kramer’s hot tub idea.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News