- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Diversity has been a total failure for America
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:15 pm to Jax-Tiger
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:15 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Diversity has not been a total failure.
Multi-culturalism and Identity politics has been an abject failure.
We should be a melting pot where we all share American values, which includes that best from ever culture. Instead, we became one of those partitioned plates where the meat is separated from the vegetables and the dessert and everyone owns there own little piece of American culture that nobody else is allowed to intrude upon.
This guy gets it. Diversity is not the problem; multiculturalism is! To the people, like the OP, who ask, “How has diversity made us stronger?” My God, that’s one of the easiest questions to answer.
quote:
Key Findings on Immigrant Tech Leadership (2025-2026) Billion-Dollar Startups (Unicorns): Immigrants have founded or co-founded 55% of U.S. startup companies valued at $1 billion or more. AI Leadership: Approximately 60% to 65% of the top AI companies in the U.S. were founded or co-founded by immigrants. Fortune 500 Companies: As of 2025, 46.2% (231 companies) of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children, with 109 companies founded directly by immigrants. Key Management: In billion-dollar startups, immigrants make up over 70% of key management or product development positions.
0
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:37 pm to G2160
quote:
You’re now further moving the goalposts
They haven't moved at all
quote:
from “predominantly European” to “does the vast majority of the population have [some] European DNA”.
No the latter was always my point. Don't create a straw man to try to argue against.
quote:
Now Brazil is the west, too?
Brazil is part of Western culture, yes.
quote:
You’ve already been told that neither Google or grok ai consider Central America the west,
Have I? I went through their criteria specifically and showed how they were. And:
Google:
quote:
Not a claim myself or anyone else is making, not relevant to the discussion.
It's relative to you ignoring how the vast majority of the population in Latin America is of European descent.
As I already explained:
[img]The Latino ethnicity is a white race that flows from Spanish and Portuguese blood. Both are Western European.[/img]
The population without European DNA is pure Amer-Indian, which is a minority in the region
quote:
You’ve aligned yourself against the board again
No, just you.
quote:
because you’re a left-leaning
So dumb
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:07 pm to MetArl15
quote:
Are you asking whether there are non-white male people in the U.S. that have contributed to our society?
Of course there are.
The question is have the groups as a whole been a net positive or net negative to American society and culture? Do their voting habits and ideals fall in line with American ideals and culture? Do their economic contributions outweigh their use of public resources? Are more of them valuable members of society that work hard, have families and build things than those of them who commit crimes, use up taxpayer resources, and destroy neighborhoods and cities?
Posted on 4/25/26 at 5:51 am to deltaland
The population that creates the most negative externalities and has the most pathological culture has been here for like 500 years and was here in a similar population % (around 12%) for whatever period you would list as America's apex. You can't use the talking point that some public policy (especially a recent one) created a push for this diversity.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 6:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You can't use the talking point that some public policy (especially a recent one) created a push for this diversity.
Open borders (in essence).
And let’s not forget, you are good with arming the criminal invaders.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 6:39 am to texag7
Pepper Spray, Gun Sales and Ammunition sales are up.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 6:39 am to texag7
quote:
Can someone name one aspect of diversity that has made America stronger?
You can be diverse within an overarching umbrella.
However, once you invite oppositional pathogens (communism, Islam, single moms, Environmental nazis, and/or the trans mafia), then you will have issues.
Sadly, those have all manifested themselves in modern day America. They also align politically (go figure).
Posted on 4/25/26 at 6:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Since a lot of this discussion is targeted at Latinos
There’s not many posters on this board I’ve seen rag on legal immigrants who are Latinos. The Latino argument mainly centers around illegal Latinos, who are a massive problem for American culture because most illegals do not assimilate well. Illegal Latinos also drain resources and are a net negative regardless of their “employment.”
Posted on 4/25/26 at 6:54 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Open borders (in essence).
Calling slavery "open borders" is a take
Posted on 4/25/26 at 7:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Calling slavery "open borders" is a take
quote:
public policy (especially a recent one)
Slavery is a recent policy?
Who knew?
The SPLC?
What kind of guns are you buying for the illegal invaders this Christmas?
Posted on 4/25/26 at 7:03 am to Gifman
quote:
There’s not many posters on this board I’ve seen rag on legal immigrants who are Latinos.
This thread is about diversity though, not immigration status. Lots of legal Latino immigrant families don't fully assimilate for a few generations, like my Italian ancestors.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 7:04 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Slavery is a recent policy?
No. You apparently didn't actually read my post
I'll quote a portion to help you
quote:
The population that creates the most negative externalities and has the most pathological culture has been here for like 500 years
Posted on 4/25/26 at 7:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Lots of legal Latino immigrant families don't fully assimilate for a few generations
Yet they did assimilate.
Latinos, Italians, Irish, etc. all have commonalities.
Islam…not so much.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 7:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Bitch, I quoted YOUR post.
Own it.
ETA
Here ya go:
Own it.
ETA
Here ya go:
quote:
You can't use the talking point that some public policy (especially a recent one) created a push for this diversity.
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 7:10 am
Posted on 4/25/26 at 7:14 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Islam…not so much.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 7:15 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Bitch, I quoted YOUR post.
Without reading the rest, apparently.
quote:
You can't use the talking point that some public policy (especially a recent one) created a push for this diversity.
Because slavery is centuries old. It's not a "new" push for "diversity"
Reading is fundamental
Posted on 4/25/26 at 7:59 am to texag7
DEI has been counterproductive, often providing cover for incompetence through accusations of bias. Transitioning to a true meritocracy will be a long struggle in such a divided nation.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 8:06 am to texag7
There used to be ideological Qualifiers for diverse people seeking to immigrate to our Constitutional Republic. Said people had to pledge allegiance therein. When those standards were dropped that is when the division began.
“Can two walk together lest they be agreed “. A hard no on that.
“Can two walk together lest they be agreed “. A hard no on that.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:compared to when our population was roughly 90% people of white European descent?
Our crime has dropped like a rock, too, but this becomes a correlation-causation thing pretty quickly I reckon.
show your work
Posted on 4/25/26 at 8:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Reading is fundamental
So let me see if I understand what you think that you wrote:
Recent public policy decisions cannot be used as a talking point concerning the push for diversity.
Soooo…open borders is not a basis for this push?
Also…
quote:
slavery is centuries old. It's not a "new" push for "diversity"
I didn’t argue otherwise.
YOU argued that no new policy fits the circumstances at hand.
Reading comprehension is fundamental.
ETA
You were dumb enough to actually post this:
quote:
Calling slavery "open borders" is a take
You posted that in response to me saying that the recent policy decision of having a (veritable) open border is a factor in the push for diversity.
Again…
reading comprehension seems to be an issue for you.
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 8:50 am
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News