Started By
Message

Desantis raises interesting death penalty issue

Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:06 am
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112406 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:06 am
OK, I'm not interested in whether DP should be abolished. We've rehashed this enough on the board. This has to do with jury numbers.
Desantis proposed that unanimous requirement should be replaced with 8 of 12 guilty votes = death sentence.
It was motivated by a trial where the killer got off with 3 dissenting (9 of 12 guilty).

So, my question is....If you favor the DP what should the vote be? I've always been in favor of the DP. I've always been opposed to unanimous. But before reading about this issue I've advocated for 10 of 12 = death.
Thoughts?
This post was edited on 4/22/23 at 11:11 am
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35946 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Desantis proposed that unanimous requirement should be replaced with 8 of 12 guilty votes = conviction.

This is insanity.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18579 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:09 am to
For a guilty finding or to be put to death or both?
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
11762 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:10 am to
That should not only put him out of the race but be labeled anti-constitutional.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112406 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:10 am to
quote:

For a guilty finding or to be put to death or both?


death sentence...just edited it.
Posted by KirbySmartsDentist
Member since Feb 2023
226 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:13 am to
Ridiculous.
Posted by Marcus Aurelius
LA
Member since Oct 2020
3900 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:17 am to
Narrow the scope... if there are eye witnesses and the killer is caught at the scene, or fleeing from the scene where there is NO question who that person is ... the majority vote should be sufficient as it would be obvious that some would not be following the law. Might could expand to video where there is NO possibility of it not being that person. So, 7-5 would be ok.

Otherwise, I think it has to be 100%.
This post was edited on 4/22/23 at 11:18 am
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
15021 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:18 am to
If DeSantis said it it must be wrong. Right?
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45071 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:19 am to
quote:

That should not only put him out of the race but be labeled anti-constitutional.




Explain why you believe this?
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38208 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:20 am to
quote:

It was motivated by a trial where the killer got off with 3 dissenting (9 of 12 guilty).


Nikolas Cruz to be specific. There was outrage over him not getting it.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
29868 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:22 am to
quote:

I've advocated for 10 of 12 = death.


maybe for other things, but when it comes to death penalty the bar has to be higher, i am not for unanimous verdicts but it should require at least 11 of 12 or do life in prison.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67635 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:26 am to

With DNA testing we've seen many times that the state got the wrong man.

The death penalty should be reserved only for politicians.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71141 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:28 am to
Especially these days. I don’t trust the judicial system
Posted by redneck hippie
Stillwater
Member since Dec 2008
5574 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:31 am to
No government should have the power to put their own citizens to death.
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10308 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Nikolas Cruz to be specific. There was outrage over him not getting it.


Not to say he doesn’t deserve the electric chair but the system failed that kid on every level. I can see why jurors felt he didn’t deserve the ultimate punishment.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27816 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:32 am to
Just clarifying, this is after a unanimous guilty verdict. The jury then has to determine if they get the axe. Should the penalty phase also be unanimous
Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
7521 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:34 am to
DeSantis continues his trend of embarrassing himself. This is just plain nuts.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30589 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:36 am to
quote:

No government should have the power to put their own citizens to death.
It's been done since the beginning of civilization. Why stop now?
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32701 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:37 am to
Please note that it used to be this way in Florida and only recently changed to require unanimity from the jury.
Posted by samson73103
Krypton
Member since Nov 2008
8107 posts
Posted on 4/22/23 at 11:38 am to
I am pro death penalty but believe it should only be on the table if DNA evidence is available. Far too many cases of people being exonerated because of corrupt cops and/or DA's who were too lazy to pursue other leads and simply wished to close a case. And when we are talking about executing people, the vote should be unanimous. In addition, the death penalty should be expanded and used as a punishment for sexual assault of children and aggravated rape.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram