
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Democrats Want POTUS' Chatbot Logs
Posted on 10/29/26 at 11:33 am
Posted on 10/29/26 at 11:33 am
Posted on 10/29/26 at 11:37 am to BoarEd
People want a lot of things 
Posted on 10/29/26 at 11:51 am to theballguy
Eh, they're going to try and claim that he compromised national security by discussing sensitive matters with a Chatbot owned by a private company and not Congress.
Peachmints inbound!
Peachmints inbound!
Posted on 10/29/26 at 11:56 am to BoarEd
Honestly, I'd like to see them, too. If for no other reason than for curiosity it would be interesting to see how the future AI overlords are influencing the leader of the free world.
It would also be interesting to see the response if it came out tha ol' Joe had been conversing with a chat bot about foreign policy and decision making.
It would also be interesting to see the response if it came out tha ol' Joe had been conversing with a chat bot about foreign policy and decision making.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 11:56 am to BoarEd
quote:
Eh, they're going to try and claim that he compromised national security by discussing sensitive matters with a Chatbot owned by a private company and not Congress.
Peachmints inbound!
Well that would actually be a pretty valid complaint. People often make the mistake of not realizing the information they share with AI is saved and becomes the kind of data that is owned by the private company. People screw up and get caught in crimes for doing the same thing.
However, I don't think asking it how the people of a country would respond and such is that.
Asking for advice is not a crime.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 12:02 pm to 3down10
quote:
However, I don't think asking it how the people of a country would respond and such is that.
Right. I highly doubt he was stupid enough to put sensitive information on the internet. They'll try to spin it that way anyways though, no matter what the logs show.
This post was edited on 10/29/26 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 10/29/26 at 12:05 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Eh, they're going to try and claim that he compromised national security by discussing sensitive matters with a Chatbot owned by a private company
They're also ensuring all of these chats are preserved pursuant to the PRA
Posted on 10/29/26 at 12:12 pm to BoarEd
Doesn’t the owner of said company have a high security clearance?
Posted on 10/29/26 at 12:17 pm to BoarEd
Remember when housekeepers found torn sticky notes in his bathroom terlet and.... wanted him crucified because he was doodling notes?
Maybe they will subpoena his TP?
Maybe they will subpoena his TP?
Posted on 10/29/26 at 12:17 pm to Deuces
Yeah, but that won't matter if he actually compromised national security. Which again, there's about a 0% chance he did. But that's the angle they're going for.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 12:44 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
It would also be interesting to see the response if it came out tha ol' Joe had been conversing with a chat bot about foreign policy and decision making.
that would make the news for sure
Posted on 10/29/26 at 12:58 pm to theballguy
He should give them a snapshot of the logs he generates while sitting on the porcellin throne talking to the chatbot.

Popular
Back to top

4













