
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cornell accuser told cops: ‘With 100% confidence I was raped
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:36 pm to 4cubbies
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:36 pm to 4cubbies
quote:The men were incapacitated. She was not. At least, by her account, no where near the extent they were.
Would someone who is incapacitated have to believe they were violated for them to have been violated?
This is where double standards become dubious.
If, for example these circumstances were reversed ... a guy visited a Sorority House, convinced two willing but extremely intoxicated girls to do a threesome. Snapchats were sent among the house girls encouraging other women to joined in and check out the free "d" in the bedroom. 5 other girls did just that. Then over the next month the guy was embarrassed and went to police complaining he was too intoxicated to consent that night, felt trapped, and he now felt he'd been raped, how would that claim be received?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:36 pm to 4cubbies
quote:weird. You made a definitive assertion that if you're drunk you can't consent. Clearly you have a position. It appears as if you know the answer if you actually give one is a problem for your definitive position. Do you really think you're that slick? As for what my answer is. I think people responsible for their own fricking actions. If you get drunk you can still be found guilty of drunk driving. If you get drunk you can still be found guilty of murder. If you get drunk you can still be found guilty of basically every crime that exists. Which by definition means that if you're drunk you can fricking consent. But women want it both ways. Which is funny because basically the feminist position on this is that men are superior to women. Think about it. They're basically saying that men should be held to a higher standard if they get themselves drunk then we're going to hold women too. If a man gets drunk he still needs to be able to decipher if the woman really really wants to have sex. He still needs to be able to decipher if she's crossed the legally drunk threshold or not even though he's not walking around with a breathalyzer in his pocket. And if he gets any of that wrong feminist want his arse in jail. Meanwhile once the woman starts drinking it's literally an accountability free zone
I don't have an answer
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:37 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Touche and fair point. But I posted about the oddness of the existence of police departments on public university campuses initially. Then I moved to discussing general consent. I never made any judgement about these specific events themselves. I'm not trying to portray myself as an expert.
Fair enough.
quote:
I think this is debatable, depending on the circumstances. If a person with an intellectual disability is raped, I agree that the victim would not need to fully grasp that he/she was violated for the crime to be a crime. If two drunk people willingly have sex and neither feels that they were violated - did a crime occur? Of if a husband and wife go out and the wife gets drunk and wants to have sex with her husband when they get home - would that be rape depending on her BAC? This gets extremely nuanced.
Im assuming by intellectual disability, we’re talking severe enough to cause doubt relative to the persons ability to reason at all; basically forms of retardation, not someone with a reading comp issue. On the feeling issue, I don’t think it matters how you feel if what you say is indicative of consent. The state of how someone felt at a given time, of course not including cases of coercion, is such a vague area that we can’t hold people accountable for. Put simply, if you say to someone you want to have sex and you then have sex and you never ask to stop at any point, you consented. If that weren’t the case, theoretically you could have cases where someone verbally consents to sex but claims at some point they decided they didn’t want to continue, never verbalizes that desire and you now have a rape case. How can you possibly hold a person responsible for knowing the internal monologue of another person that they never shared out loud? That’s an incredibly dangerous precedent to set if we start going after people and the victim statements are essentially “I told them I wanted to have sex and we did but at some point I wanted to stop. I never said that to the other person but I feel violated so they should be punished.” That’s an incredibly dangerous precedent and it would absolutely be weaponized against people in a frivolous manner.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:42 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I don't care to familiarize myself with the details of this incident.
Then why multi post in this thread? Start your own fn thread about consent and get the f out.
A dozen posts in a thread that you don't care to know the details about.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:45 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
Im assuming by intellectual disability, we’re talking severe enough to cause doubt relative to the persons ability to reason at all; basically forms of retardation, not someone with a reading comp issue.
Right, like many individuals with Down Syndrome or someone who is unable to live independently due to their intellectual limitations.
quote:I completely agree. I'm more thinking about instances where incapacitation is involved. Does someone have to understand/realize/agree that he or she was violated for that person to have been violated (when considering typically functioning adults)?
The state of how someone felt at a given time, of course not including cases of coercion, is such a vague area that we can’t hold people accountable for. Put simply, if you say to someone you want to have sex and you then have sex and you never ask to stop at any point, you consented.
Lets say the girl presented herself as a willing participant, was later determined to be incapacitated, then agrees that she was unable to consent at the time due to her incapacitation - would that be rape? If they boys who also presented themselves as willing participants, were later determined to be incapacitated, but maintain that they consented to the sexual acts - were they raped too? That's what I mean when I ask if what people believe they experienced matters when making these determinations.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:45 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I don't have an answer. What's your answer?
My wife and I went on vacation and went down to the hotel bar one night a month ago. We both drank to the point of intoxication. She said she wanted to have sex so we went upstairs and did. Did we rape each other? What if I decided a month later to say “ ya know, I really wasn’t super feeling it.” Did she rape me because I felt violated?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:46 pm to Fun Bunch
I need pics of this chick
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:46 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
This could all be true. I personally never had any contact with campus police as an undergrad or graduate student at two different public universities in Louisiana. It just seems redundant and creates more opportunities for mistakes or misconduct.
You may be right. It’s something I hadn’t really ever considered before so it’s possible the initial need has become obsolete.
And I’m sure some of it is location dependent. Like at U of So Cal, do you really want LAPD responding to student issues? Probably not. As a parent of a student I might feel better knowing there are campus police as a first line of defense.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:48 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Incredible reporting from the NYT.
The woman at Cornell did not consider herself a rape victim until she saw people making fun of her for being a slut.
She went to her "big sister" in her sorority and confessed that she had been a slut. Then while texting one of the men she reassured him that she enjoyed the first part of it and nothing illegal had happened.
Later, she texted him that she was traumatized. Not by the sex, but because everyone was laughing at her.
One week after her "rape," she was mad that she got disinvited from a party at the frathouse of her "rapists"!!!!!!!
Only a few days later, she decided that she was a "rape victim." Nobody would laugh at her anymore! She went from an object of ridicule and shame to a hero.
Once again, we need to have a serious conversation about how women are being lied to.
People do not respect sluts. Even at woke Ivy League universities. Human nature is what it is.
The lesson is women should protect their reputations by not doing things like this
Regret = rape
Apparently, she didn't even go to the cops until the same frat disinvited her to its Halloween Party
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:51 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Wrong. She had multiple consensual threesomes and encounters The other guys were more intoxicated than her, by her own admission, in several of them. She gave a detailed report to the police and the police said "ok well no crimes were committed". She told the police that every single time she told someone no or wanted stop, it stopped She has many snapchat and text messages with some of the frat guys where she wanted to keep hanging out, wanted to come back again and do things, wanted to smoke with them etc She also has texts with a sorority sister where it starts to come out that everyone knows what a whore she is and that's when she starts to concoct the notion that something happened against her will
I wanna know what this whore looks like. Is she worth all this bullshite?
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:52 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:I genuinely don't know the answers to the questions I'm posing, fwiw. I'm not trying to do some weird leading question thing to get you to agree with a predetermined position I have. I legit don't know what the right answer is.
NC_Tigah
quote:Public perception and actual culpability are two different things. How the claim is received is completely separate from if the claim has merit.
If, for example these circumstances were reversed ... a guy visited a Sorority House, convinced two willing but extremely intoxicated girls to do a threesome. Snapchats were sent among the house girls encouraging other women to joined in and check out the free "d" in the bedroom. 5 other girls did just that. Then over the next month the guy was embarrassed and went to police complaining he was too intoxicated to consent that night, felt trapped, and he now felt he'd been raped, how would that claim be received?
I agree that an alleged victim not claiming to be a victim for weeks or months later raises credibility questions.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:52 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I completely agree. I'm more thinking about instances where incapacitation is involved.
That’s easy, it’s rape unless a very specific set of circumstances. I’ve had friends whose wives tell their husbands in advance that they plan on drinking and getting plastered that night and they’re giving permission in advance for sexual contact even if they’re wasted. Now, is that my cup of tea? No. I don’t want sex if my wife isn’t in the mood or otherwise actively involved. Is it rape in that situation? I don’t think so.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:56 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
And I’m sure some of it is location dependent. Like at U of So Cal, do you really want LAPD responding to student issues? Probably not. As a parent of a student I might feel better knowing there are campus police as a first line of defense.
Yeah, even in New Orleans I don't have tons of faith in NOPD to even show up let alone investigate anything.
My job sometimes overlaps with law enforcement and I actually am friendly with a police officer at a private university here. I've asked him what kind of calls he gets and he said its a lot of nonsense, really. Like people asking him to essentially do errands/chores (bring medicine or move something heavy).
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:00 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
That’s easy, it’s rape unless a very specific set of circumstances.
quote:Would you say both the young men and young woman were raped in this scenario? Would prosecution even be possible if everyone was incapacitated?
Lets say the girl presented herself as a willing participant, was later determined to be incapacitated, then agrees that she was unable to consent at the time due to her incapacitation - would that be rape? If they boys who also presented themselves as willing participants, were later determined to be incapacitated, but maintain that they consented to the sexual acts - were they raped too? That's what I mean when I ask if what people believe they experienced matters when making these determinations.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:01 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I actually am friendly with a police officer at a private university here
You *actually* are friendly with a police officer? Oh, the horror.
How do you normally treat them?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:04 pm to maizegoblue
I just meant that I actually know someone who has this niche job.
I'm nice to everyone who carries guns, fwiw.
I'm nice to everyone who carries guns, fwiw.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:05 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
quote:
Cornell accuser told cops: ‘With 100% confidence I was raped
She then proceeded to compose a 6 page statement - edited 20 times - which described what happened as "conscious and consensual". The DA saw this and refused to prosecute, as there were no crimes even alleged.
Also surprised those who are rushing to convict haven't said anything about her pulling out Ketamine to snort off some of the guys dicks so she could go longer.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:09 pm to 4cubbies
quote:and it is a worthwhile discussion to have. People here are recounting the Duke Lacrosse case. That was particularly egregious but different from this incident. The Duke accuser concocted the entire tale, and a corrupt prosecutor took the case and ran. She was not charged for false accusation.
I'm not making a point. I'm having a discussion.
This is different, and far more akin to the Athens Ohio " ATM rape case." In that instance, a couple engaged in cunnilingus in front of an ATM on a public sidewalk. The woman smiled at and even engaged with passersby. An audience formed. Videos and pictures were taken.
The next day, when the pics started circulating, and the girl was identified, she was mortified. She filed rape charges. Given the content of the videos, it was clear she was fully participating and happy about it in the moment. After two years of legal to-and-fro, she dropped the charges. There was zero accountability for the false filing or for legal expenses incurred by the guy.
Similarly, in September 2014, a woman falsely claimed she was dragged into an alley and raped by a Black man after leaving a bar in uptown Charlotte. As the assailant was not in custody, restaurant/bar traffic in the area took a big hit. Eventually, police cobbled together video of the woman from the time she left the bar until she drove home. There was no assault. She admitted making the story up. She was not charged with filing a false report.
There are simply no consequences on that side of the equation.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:10 pm to America250
And there won’t be criminal proceedings because my understanding is she is suing in civil court. Likely due to two reasons.
Easier standards for a conviction….. drum roll please….. money.
Easier standards for a conviction….. drum roll please….. money.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:14 pm to NC_Tigah
re: the examples you listed --
I'm going to preface this by saying that I haven't like really worked any of this out and I'm sure it is probably unconstitutional and maybe immoral or illegal or horribly offensive.
It seems like there needs to be a discreet or secret court or law enforcement unit to investigate rapes or sexual assaults. There's just too much at stake for everyone involved in these accusations.
I'm going to preface this by saying that I haven't like really worked any of this out and I'm sure it is probably unconstitutional and maybe immoral or illegal or horribly offensive.
It seems like there needs to be a discreet or secret court or law enforcement unit to investigate rapes or sexual assaults. There's just too much at stake for everyone involved in these accusations.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 2:15 pm

Popular
Back to top



1







