Started By
Message
locked post

Congress approval ratings since 1990

Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:43 am
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59373 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:43 am


Yet incumbents almost always get re-elected.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
62839 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Yet incumbents almost always get re-elected.


It's "the other guy's congressman/senator that's the problem, not mine."
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27035 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:45 am to
America is on a downward trajectory. Too many entitlements ruining work ethic. No one can fix it because the majority of the voters like how it needs to get fixed.
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
9456 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Yet incumbents almost always get re-elected.
People don’t support congress as a whole. But by and large they don’t think their Senators and Representatives are the problem so they continue to vote them in.

Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59373 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:46 am to
Or people just don’t care enough to waste their time voting unless they get something out of it, so “supporters” vote en masse to secure their kickbacks while everyone else watches the game at home.
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
6631 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:51 am to
Corporate pork.
Posted by hogwildinhouston
Member since Oct 2011
793 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:54 am to
Refresh my memory....

What the hell happened in 2002 to get it so high?
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109873 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:54 am to
So their highest approval was when they were initiating the Gulf War and implementing things like the Patriot Act.

Are those the sort of halcyon days you are longing for?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59373 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Are those the sort of halcyon days you are longing for?


What makes you ask me that? I’m not “longing for” a high congressional approval rating.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59373 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:57 am to
Another relevant graph:



I find it interesting that more people turned out to vote for Congress than President in the early days.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59373 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:00 am to
quote:

No one can fix it because the majority of the voters like how it needs to get fixed.


No one who can will attempt to fix it because what will they campaign on next election cycle?
Posted by Espritdescorps
Member since Nov 2020
2704 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:00 am to
quote:

ruining work ethic

Don’t worry man; AI is going to fix that
Posted by ohieaux
Athens Ohieaux
Member since Sep 2011
117 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Refresh my memory....

What the hell happened in 2002 to get it so high?


Almost certainly the patriotism after 9/11
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7998 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:13 am to
It cost a ton of money to run for office, incumbents not only have the funding they also have name recognition.

Districts are way to big, elections are way to expensive, so all you get is people who are owned by some special interest group. You’re not getting a fellow citizen who just wants to serve is nation and community.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
35706 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 10:31 am to
That was a nice little bump they got post-9/11, wasn't it? This is exactly why they love war, and exactly what Eisenhower warned the world about...



We fell into that trap and now it's too late to climb out. We should have known better but allowed the acts carried out on 9/11 to cause is to trade individual liberties for the perception of "temporary" security through the Patriot Act, which was something against which Benjamin Franklin warned us.



Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
19321 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 11:14 am to
Incumbents control party money and small pockets of voters in their districts. Turnout is always low and it’s expensive to challenge an incumbent….even for a House seat.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35897 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 11:21 am to
quote:

So their highest approval was when they were initiating the Gulf War and implementing things like the Patriot Act.

Everything and everyone was relatively popular after 9/11
Posted by iBack8569
Member since Dec 2021
1597 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 11:26 am to
New faces are usually younger, more radical, and think differently than their older counterparts. Voters don’t like that kind of change.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
25162 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Yet incumbents almost always get re-elected.


Here’s the problem and it will take a lomg slow grind to fix.

You have an incumbent RINO vs a Commie. Prior to that you have a Primary and the incumbent RINO has all the system money plus all the money they pilfered during their term. So most win Primary.

Now your choice is a RINO vs a commie. The commie will never reach across the aisle and 100% votes with their party vs the RINO will reach over and give the commie a handjob occasionally.

Its very hard to beat entrenched incumbents. The only way is to pick them off a bit at a time where money comes in bigly for the outsider. It will never be fixed in our lifetime and we need to pick the worst ones and even if not your state, gang up nationally and support the challenger financially.

Thats the problem. Vote RINO or vote commie. Until someone enters race and gets bog backing.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26378 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 11:39 am to
Every approval rating on that graph represents and idiot. If anyone is happy with congress they are gullible as hell.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram