Started By
Message

re: Colonial Pipeline executives reportedly paid hackers nearly $5 Million in ransom money

Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:22 am to
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
102330 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Are you saying they government should have given Colonial the money (your tax money) to pay the ransom?



I'm saying an attack on America's energy infrastructure is an act of war and should be treated as such. No ransom should be paid. The Biden administration responded from a place of cowardice, said it was an issue for a private company to handle and let an American company be extorted for Ransom while incentivizing these attacks.

Even if this was a group of actors unaffiliated with any state group, you can damn well guarantee adversarial nations are watching how Biden responded to this and it wasn't forceful in anyway. Hes a pussy.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104070 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:26 am to
Pretty much.

Trump, or most other competent presidents, would have sent the FBI, NSA, and half a dozen other alphabet agencies to find these assholes and/or fix the system.

Biden? “That’s a private industry issue.”
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77693 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:28 am to
All they've done is embolden these hackers and others that they can get a payday for these kinds of attacks.
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10681 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:30 am to
- Company said they weren't going to pay the ransom just a few days ago.

- Ransom was only $5 million.

- The pipeline was always operational, and the only thing corrupted were the billing files - meaning Colonial Pipeline elected not to pump the oil.

Something isn't adding up here.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95648 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:33 am to
quote:

So they're going to keep happening.


What if we did something to the hackers? Like arrest them if they're U.S. citizens or use *ahem* "other" options if they are both located internationally and foreign citizens?

Would they keep happening then?
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
22316 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:33 am to
This will happen often now
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95648 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:34 am to
quote:

- The pipeline was always operational, and the only thing corrupted were the billing files - meaning Colonial Pipeline elected not to pump the oil.

Something isn't adding up here.


Even the timing was sketchy. I feel this was a trial balloon/dry run/rehearsal for some bigger interruption on the horizon.
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
39523 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:35 am to
It is honestly pretty wild to think how easily all of society could come screeching to a halt because of something as simple as thig

Better be prepared baws
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15717 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:37 am to
Pedo Joe probably gave them the money from his Hamas/Iran stash
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39872 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Do they want to guarantee more hacks in the future?

Because this is how you guarantee more hacks in the future.
Agreed, but...is there really a shortage of hacks?
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
31095 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:41 am to
quote:

That just emboldens them to do more. I wonder what their next large target will be.

I don't see much difference in this and our govt sending pallets of money to countries if they'll promise to not develop nuclear weapons.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Like arrest them if they're U.S. citizens


They're not.

quote:

or use *ahem* "other" options if they are both located internationally and foreign citizens?


Based on what I've read they're in country(ies) where I don't think we can operate that freely, but who knows. I also read that the group behind this only intended and did in fact lock up the Colonial back-office. They did not want to create an international scene...probably because they didn't want to incur the wrath. It was Colonial acting in an, understandable, abundance of caution that elected to shut-in ops.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:43 am to
quote:

This will happen often now



It's already happening often, but you never hear about it because it doesn't usually have as visible an impact.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95648 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Based on what I've read they're in country(ies) where I don't think we can operate that freely, but who knows


If we have accurate targeting information, we can deliver ordnance to any spot on the planet.

So, the next question would be about political will. I get that no one wants to authorize a strike if Hacker A freezes bank account of Corporation B, but an assault on the gasoline supply of the United States is a national security threat.

Maybe they should draw the a-hole card and be made examples of?
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
17960 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:44 am to
You're a fricking moron. Hunter says hold my beer and crack pipe.


Idiot.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:45 am to
quote:

I'm saying an attack on America's energy infrastructure is an act of war and should be treated as such. No ransom should be paid. The Biden administration responded from a place of cowardice, said it was an issue for a private company to handle and let an American company be extorted for Ransom while incentivizing these attacks.


So go with a long term gas shortage through basically 1/3 of the country rather than pay the ransom and work in the background to get the criminals or do something about improving internet security around industries that can impact national security?

quote:

Even if this was a group of actors unaffiliated with any state group, you can damn well guarantee adversarial nations are watching how Biden responded to this and it wasn't forceful in anyway. Hes a pussy.


You don't think there would be a significantly different response if another nation did this?
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
14286 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:46 am to
I’m absolutely shocked that your little bitch arse is in here playing contrarian and defending Biden

Absolutely shocked
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:48 am to
quote:


If we have accurate targeting information, we can deliver ordnance to any spot on the planet.


So we're just going to drop ordinance into the middle of an Eastern European nation - no issues?

quote:

Maybe they should draw the a-hole card and be made examples of?


I hope, but I think it would end up being something much more cold war style cloak and dagger "apprehension" than blunt force military...and that takes time.
This post was edited on 5/13/21 at 11:49 am
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110962 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:51 am to
quote:

It's already happening often, but you never hear about it because it doesn't usually have as visible an impact.



Do you think choosing something with such an obvious visible impact was just happenstance or deliberate?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95648 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 11:54 am to
quote:

So we're just going to drop ordinance into the middle of an Eastern European nation - no issues?


Well, if that's where they're at, it is a non-hostile nation. Interpol or whatever might be able to make an apprehension.

I thought you were suggesting it might be in relatively hostile areas.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram