re: CNN, MSNow, Politico reporters were denied access to the White House despite judge’s order

quote:

---

I am not sure I understand what you are getting at.

---

It's simple.

quote:

---

The White House can withdraw a press pass, but they must give a reason, and that reason must comply with Constitutional standards.

---

Post the section of the Constitution that establishes special due process for press in the White House vs anybody else who comes and goes from the WH, OR someone who has their security clearance revoked without some kind of "due process" hearing.

What are the Constitutional requirements?

Legally getting around these TROs should be easy.

If Trump had had the right people around him they’d just write up fresh executive orders that work around the Judge’s reasoning. Not argue or disagree with it. But sidestep.

Trump really needs to recruit people outside of the political good ole boys club. Hire real patriots that don’t have ulterior motives. Hell, I’d help with some workarounds and outside the box thinking.

quote:

---

The “activist” judge in this case was a Trump appointee

---

And?

quote:

---

What are the Constitutional requirements?

---

Due Process.

There has to be a reason for the revocation and an opportunity to respond to the claim for revocation.

Busy Day at the White House

quote:

---

A "free press" doesn't mean the press has the default right to be wherever they please.

---

Exactly, you don’t see these hacks riding around in the “Looking Glass” Doomsday plane. I so detest the media in this country

quote:

---

A "free press" doesn't mean the press has the default right to be wherever they please.

---

A "free press" doesn't mean the MSM news stations have the right to knowingly make false statements about Trump in an attempt to convince the American voters that Trump is an evil man who must be removed from office by any means necessary including defaming him by lying about him.

That dog won't hunt!

quote:

---

You just got owned.

---

No.

No I didn't.

What's the judge gonna do now, arrest somebody? Who's he going to arrest?Piss on that so-called judge......

quote:

---

That doesn't mean anything.

Again, I ask: The reporter has to be vetted and get security clearance and receive an access pass to the area of the WH it makes sense for them to be in.

So does the WH chef.

Are you telling me that if Trump decided he didn't like the food the chef made and the chef was let go and he had to turn in his access pass on his way out, a federal judge might rule that the WH couldn't keep him out of the kitchen pending legal proceedings?

If so, that's the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.

If not, why not?

Why doesn't the chef have "due process" rights in that scenario?

---

I do not know if the chef has due process rights in that scenario. I don't know if the White house Chef has civil service protections, I assume he does not, though.
I don;t think it is a good analogy. The White House has set up a press briefing room and has set out requirements for any reporter to meet in order to have access to that briefing room (and perhaps other places). There is nothing like that in the chef example. If the White house created a ballroom and a series of mini-kitchens, created rules on how a chef can get access to that room and handed out passes for every chef who qualified and this was one of the ways a Washington chef could make money then it would be analogous and the White house would have to justify why it canceled or a chef's pass when the Chef otherwise satisfied all the requirements for obtaining and keeping a pass.
Instead, what the Chef did was apply for an at-will employment job with the understanding that the President might not like his food and he could be fired for that reason or any other.