Started By
Message

re: CNN, MSNow, Politico reporters were denied access to the White House despite judge’s order

Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:20 am to
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
9470 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:20 am to
quote:

People cheering on ignoring judges orders.

Just keep that same energy when the dems come back into power.


Oh no, I’m so worried about Democrats doing what they already do.

And there is a Supreme Court ruling that supersedes this activist judge’s ruling. Saxbe v. Washington Post, 1974
Posted by FLTech
he/won
Member since Sep 2017
30166 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:23 am to
Naah they just told the world what plane Trump was on during an overseas trip.. Not a big deal at all
Posted by grich31
Youngsville, La
Member since May 2008
2671 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:44 am to
No potus himself said ban was because of stories ge didn’t like not because of National security, I guess now that’s the fall back answer for the ban. Is any evidence provided of classified info or national security secrets being leaked or reported.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
44786 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
44786 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:15 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

Despite the court order overnight, CNN, MS NOW and Politico reporters are still being blocked from entering the White House grounds today. Yet for Xi’s visit, members of the Chinese state media are present.
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
503 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:16 pm to
Trump caved.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
44786 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:17 pm to
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
13658 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:21 pm to
White House Access Is a Privilege — Not a Right

quote:

2009: The Obama White House branded Fox News as the “research arm” and “communications arm” of the Republican Party, barred it from a round of exclusive Sunday show interviews, instructed agencies to “skip” including it in pooled coverage, derided it as “really not news,” and undertook an all-out effort to isolate the organization. Barack Hussein Obama now calls a Fox ban “unimaginable,” but his White House tried it — and his spokesman admitted they were willing to do it.

2010: The Obama Justice Department labeled Fox News correspondent James Rosen a possible “co-conspirator” in a criminal leak case, secretly monitored his emails and phone calls, and tracked his movements — an “unprecedented” level of surveillance and intimidation of a journalist over his reporting.

2011: Obama White House officials restricted the Boston Herald from coverage — writing that pool slots depended on covering Obama “fairly” — after the paper ran a front page Mitt Romney op-ed.

2011: After a San Francisco Chronicle reporter recorded protesters interrupting an Obama fundraiser, White House officials threatened to strip the outlet from access and warned of retaliation if the paper reported on it.

2012: The Obama Justice Department secretly seized two months of telephone records covering more than 20 Associated Press lines used by more than a dozen journalists — targeting them over their reporting.

2023: The Biden White House blocked New York Post reporter Steven Nelson from covering the President’s only daytime public event — despite empty seats in the room — after the reporter pressed Biden on his family’s shady business dealings.

2023: The Biden Administration restricted more than 440 reporters from White House access through a new, retroactive press credentialing process — with independent and conservative journalists taking a heavy share of the hit. The White House Correspondents’ Association barely objected.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/09/white-house-access-is-a-privilege-not-a-right/
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23669 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:24 pm to
TACO
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
15206 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

You really believe its some appointed judge's place to decide what media pundits are allowed in the White House press room ?


Yes, deciding legal issues is literally their job.

quote:

I'm sure you'd feel the same if it were Kamala banning Newsmax and OAN.


Obama tried the same thing with Fox

CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC pushed back and Obama relented.



Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
13658 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Cities don't enforce federal immigration laws. They can't deport anyone.


They release illegals when there are orders from ICE to detain them and they have also ordered their police to stand down and not help ice when there are large violent activists during the removal of the illegals from detention centers.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
13284 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

They release illegals when there are orders from ICE to detain them and they have also ordered their police to stand down and not help ice when there are large violent activists during the removal of the illegals from detention centers.


Yup. Horrible actions of vile people. My question was: "What court orders are they ignoring?"

Just to check though, you do know that ICE can't ORDER cities, counties, or states to do anything, right?

It's like some of y'all don't appreciate federalism and the Constitution.

This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 12:45 pm
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
15273 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Thanks. Cities don't enforce federal immigration laws. They can't deport anyone.


They also are not supposed to interfere with them either.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
13284 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

They also are not supposed to interfere with them either.


Absolutely. I look forward to any arrests the Feds will be making in that regard. Why haven't they?
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2911 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

A "free press" doesn't mean the press has the default right to be wherever they please.


Not sure if the Court got this far but there is a distinction between various areas of the White House (as well as the Capitol, the SCOTUS building, etc). A press pass is something akin to a license where there is a property value attached to it and taking away that property without due process is illegal.
Further, that property right only applies to the designated areas for the working press - say the briefing room. This is distinguished from other areas - like the Oval Office, or Air Force 1, or the President's personal bedroom, etc. Clearly, the President can allow or deny access to his personal White House bedroom for any reason, it is his personal space. There is some reason to believe the same applies to the President's working spaces as well - like the Oval Office. These facts are found in the AP case that is working tis way to trial.
But this is different. This is a complete denial of access - public spaces as well as designated press areas - and that access was taken away presumably based on the content of the reporting.
Posted by COAUTiger
Lil town called Nunyogotdambidness
Member since Jun 2012
418 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

The Biden Administration restricted more than 440 reporters from White House access through a new, retroactive press credentialing process — with independent and conservative journalists taking a heavy share of the hit. The White House Correspondents’ Association barely objected.


I can't speak for the earlier ones but this one is misconstrued. They pulled the credentials for agencies that did not have a Washington DC address and had not attended in the previous 6 months. If they requested new credentials, they were granted.

One more thing
quote:

They release illegals when there are orders from ICE to detain them

There were orders from ICE, not a federal judge. In fact, the courts have ruled that cities can resist.
The Department of Justice has filed lawsuits against various sanctuary cities. Federal judges have dismissed these lawsuits, affirming that local policies curtailing cooperation with ICE are lawful and protected.

Not a fan of Denver being a sanctuary city. Just trying to give accurate info.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 1:03 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
42644 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Cities don't enforce federal immigration laws. They can't deport anyone.


It’s amazing to see you getting dumber than dumb.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
13658 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Just to check though, you do know that ICE can't ORDER cities, counties, or states to do anything, right?

It's like some of y'all don't appreciate federalism and the Constitution.


Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
15273 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:04 pm to
quote:


People cheering on ignoring judges orders.

Just keep that same energy when the dems come back into power.


The fricking democrats do that anyway.

about time we responded in kind
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
13658 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

There were orders from ICE, not a federal judge. In fact, the courts have ruled that cities can resist.
The Department of Justice has filed lawsuits against various sanctuary cities. Federal judges have dismissed these lawsuits, affirming that local policies curtailing cooperation with ICE are lawful and protected.


There is an ongoing "judicial coup" going against everything Trump is trying to do to uphold the constitution.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram