- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: #ClimateScam: denialism claims flooding Twitter have scientists worried
Posted on 1/22/23 at 7:13 pm to Milf n Cookies
Posted on 1/22/23 at 7:13 pm to Milf n Cookies
quote:
Climate alarmists panic that Twitter is now allowing dissenting views on global warming.
Until Barry Soetoro and Michael sell their mansion on Martha’s Vinyard there’s no reason to have the slightest concern.
1
Posted on 1/22/23 at 7:14 pm to cokebottleag
Sorry. Accidentally fat-thumbed the DV. Meant to be a UV.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 7:15 pm to jimmy the leg
Humanity is responsible for 1/2 of that.
Are you sure? Can you show me the proof?
Are you sure? Can you show me the proof?
Posted on 1/22/23 at 7:35 pm to Milf n Cookies
Someone needs to ban these memes!
Posted on 1/22/23 at 7:45 pm to Milf n Cookies
How do you trust a science that does not allow peer review?
Posted on 1/22/23 at 8:48 pm to chity
quote:
peer review
Imagine you are a “peer” in the climate research community, and you like your job, and that job depends on you getting funded. I’d imagine it’s pretty hard to get grants if your expert opinion is there is no climate concern.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 8:52 pm to Milf n Cookies
quote:
Humanity is responsible for 1/2 of that. Are you sure? Can you show me the proof?
Nope. It is an guesstimate by the crew collecting data. They simply didn’t discount it.
They seem reasoned and data driven.
This post was edited on 1/22/23 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 1/22/23 at 8:55 pm to JackieTreehorn
quote:
Judging from the last 3 years I’ve determined that scientists know about as much as Jimmy down at the pulp wood mill.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:01 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Explain to the backwoods hayseed how oceans can only rise in certain areas, but not others.
I can only guess, but I would imagine that the Earth spinning at such a high rate of speed would push that water to the equator (centrifugal force), thus creating a bulge..
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:05 pm to Milf n Cookies
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:17 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
The moon
Those are called tidal forces, and they always exist, regardless of the temperature.
What I am understanding is that they are saying because of the melting ice caps, the sea levels will rise, but not everywhere. Not sure how that works.
This post was edited on 1/22/23 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:07 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Humanity is responsible for 1/2 of that. Are you sure? Can you show me the proof?
quote:
Nope. It is an guesstimate by the crew collecting data. They simply didn’t discount it.
They seem reasoned and data driven.
The scientific method requires that all data be deemed suspect until it is properly corroborated. Take a look at this video where an interested reader had the audacity to look into the claim made by National Atmospheric & Oceanic Administration (NOAA) that the summer of 2021 was the hottest on record. This is a really eye opening video and gives some insight as to how data is manipulated to forward an agenda.
LINK
Don't believe everything your government tells you.
This post was edited on 1/22/23 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:14 pm to jimmy the leg
ZERO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF HUMAN INDUCED CLIMATE CHANGE
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:15 pm to cokebottleag
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:16 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
The last 100 years the temp rose 1.5 degrees
And that’s not even accounting for errors in temperature measurement and consistency in record keeping.
Could be 1 degree, .5 degree, 0 degree, 2 degree.
I certainly don’t trust technological measurements from 100 years ago, whether they are temperature records, or something else.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:18 pm to Milf n Cookies
quote:
Climate alarmists panic that Twitter is now allowing dissenting views on global warming.
Are the science moms getting upset again?
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:22 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Until Barry Soetoro and Michael sell their mansion on Martha’s Vinyard there’s no reason to have the slightest concern.
Don't forget about his and his Hawaii mansion on the beach, as well
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:26 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
The last 100 years the temp rose 1.5 degrees
Even that number is suspect. Watch the video I linked further up this page.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:38 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
What I am understanding is that they are saying because of the melting ice caps, the sea levels will rise, but not everywhere. Not sure how that works.
Melting sea ice does not add to sea level rise. Melting land ice does.
Land also rises and falls. It’s falling a lot in Louisiana (9 mm per year) due to subsidence. It’s rising on the west coast at many locations due to the subduction zone where the continental plates meet.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:38 pm to Milf n Cookies
quote:
The scientific method requires that all data be deemed suspect until it is properly corroborated.
This is not true. The scientific method is a process. It doesn't require anything other than the implementation of the methods of science.
Climate "science" is largely inaccurate modeling based on biased data. It's not the application of the scientific method at all.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News