- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Check out this X post from Trump’s FCC Chairman nominee.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:16 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:16 am to SlowFlowPro
I have to admit that you did do a good job of trolling us with something that is not even germane to new FCC Chairman's X post with:
When all he 's doing is interpreting "good faith" behavior under Section 230.
quote:
MOAR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POWER AND REGULATION
When all he 's doing is interpreting "good faith" behavior under Section 230.
3
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
MOAR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POWER AND REGULATION
What new regulations are being placed on big tech?
Asked another way, how do you know he's not pursuing this from the angle of regulations currently in place?
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:19 am to GumboPot
quote:
I have to admit that you did do a good job of trolling us with something that is not even germane to new FCC Chairman's X post with:
He does this a lot.
Best case was how he took a thread where the OP linked an X post of Tommie Robinson complaining about grooming gangs and tried to weasel into it actually being about immigrants.
Edit: Then he tried to scrape together a W by pretending he "got me" when I admitted that I would use lethal force to protect my child from grooming gangs.
This post was edited on 11/18/24 at 8:40 am
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:How about some examples?
Authoritarian-right regimes have made similar federal expansions.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:21 am to GumboPot
quote:
have to admit that you did do a good job of trolling us with something that is not even germane to new FCC Chairman's X post with:
It's not trolling.
Based on his expansive (likely desired) interpretation of the statue, Fedgov power would explode
We lit just celebrated repealing Chevron to eliminate this bureaucratic-led expansion of federal power and now people want to go back?
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:22 am to Azkiger
quote:
Best case was how he took a thread where the OP linked an X post of Tony Robinson complaining about grooming gangs and tried to weasel into it actually being about immigrants.
Edit: Then he tried to scrape together a W by pretending he "got me" when I admitted that I would use lethal force to protect my child from grooming gangs.
Still melting over your dishonesty not getting a response, months later
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:23 am to GumboPot
quote:
It's odd that you are taking up for Big Tech (which a good anti-trust case can be brought against them) and not the general public and calling that authoritarian.
The sooner yall realize the ambulance chaser from lake Charles is an objectively stupid person that only exists to regurgitate the talking points of his progressive deities, the better off yall will be.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Still melting over your dishonesty not getting a response, months later
Did the OP link a video of Tommie complaining about grooming gangs?
Did you not respond to that post and 1.) not reference grooming gangs and 2.) mentioned immigrants instead?
Did you not pretend my admission that I'd use firearms to defend my child from grooming gangs was some sort of startling admission?
This post was edited on 11/18/24 at 8:40 am
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:31 am to Azkiger
SFP really is the pigeon that plays chess...
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:35 am to GumboPot
Simple fix to media misinformation,
1. The FCC "trademarks" the use of the word "News" in broadcast and publications. Clearly define a standard that is to be followed if the word News is used in the broadcast or publication title. 1. Should be based on facts. 2 should be based on all facts, pro and con, if the reporting entity knows other facts exist. 3. The use of reporter opinion and narrative eliminates the source from legal protections.
2. If a reporting source is going to use a 3rd party fact check service, the reporting source is to be held legally accountable for the facts they do or do not report in their broadcast or publication. There is to be no legal shield.
3. Mandate that opinions must be clearly labeled as opinions and are not to be relied as facts. In Broadcast, news opinions must be announced before the opinion is given and after the opinion is given. Opinions and news must not be intermingled within the same reporting or article.
1. The FCC "trademarks" the use of the word "News" in broadcast and publications. Clearly define a standard that is to be followed if the word News is used in the broadcast or publication title. 1. Should be based on facts. 2 should be based on all facts, pro and con, if the reporting entity knows other facts exist. 3. The use of reporter opinion and narrative eliminates the source from legal protections.
2. If a reporting source is going to use a 3rd party fact check service, the reporting source is to be held legally accountable for the facts they do or do not report in their broadcast or publication. There is to be no legal shield.
3. Mandate that opinions must be clearly labeled as opinions and are not to be relied as facts. In Broadcast, news opinions must be announced before the opinion is given and after the opinion is given. Opinions and news must not be intermingled within the same reporting or article.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:36 am to Mtwabp
quote:
is an objectively stupid person
quote:
the talking points of his progressive deities
The ironing
You seem confused
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:46 am to SlowFlowPro
In back to back posts you contradicted yourself.
First post:
Second post sucking your own peen:
Licensure is an arm of government power and regulation.
And the aim of the OP is that they want to remove section 230 protections from social media platforms and news stations. . . So less government oversight and just make them play like every other organization.
First post:
quote:
MOAR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POWER AND REGULATION
Second post sucking your own peen:
quote:
Next, require all 'journalists' to be licensed; Those who report the news should be restricted to facts (or penalized). They should given the time honored protections to criminal & civil prosecution....but their work must be declared open and broadly.
Licensure is an arm of government power and regulation.
And the aim of the OP is that they want to remove section 230 protections from social media platforms and news stations. . . So less government oversight and just make them play like every other organization.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:49 am to TD422
quote:
SFP really is the pigeon that plays chess...
So true.
Here SFP is trying to spin a thread that started with a Tommie Robinson rant against grooming gangs into being about illegal immigrants, and he gets pissy when I say that it's a shame that the Brits disarmed themselves because now they can't defend against this.
I repeatedly reminded him that the context of the conversation was grooming gangs, yet he kept trying to ignore it, instead pretending that he had a "gotcha" with my threat of using violence.
Then here he is spiking the football after I said that people should resort to violence to protect their children from grooming gangs.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 8:50 am to Azkiger
quote:
What new regulations are being placed on big tech?
Asked another way, how do you know he's not pursuing this from the angle of regulations currently in place?
Where'd you go SFP?
Posted on 11/18/24 at 9:00 am to GumboPot
That’s all he does.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 9:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The ironing You seem confused
I see we can now add irony and confused to that ever growing list of words you use incorrectly, further solidifying that you are an objectively stupid person.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 9:14 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:I don't remember stating the government was responsible for enforcement.
Uhhhh, that’s state media
But if an attorney is licensed to practice law - why can't a journalist be to practice their craft?
Posted on 11/18/24 at 9:22 am to GumboPot
Posted on 11/18/24 at 9:28 am to SlowFlowPro
Imagine believing that cracking down on authoritarian censorship of speech of one side of the political spectrum and dismantling the dishonest media outlets acting as agents of an authoritarian government regime is... right-wing authoritarianism. 
JFC.
fricking nerd.
JFC.
fricking nerd.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 10:52 am to WhiskeyThrottle
quote:
In back to back posts you contradicted yourself.
I did not
quote:
Next, require all 'journalists' to be licensed; Those who report the news should be restricted to facts (or penalized). They should given the time honored protections to criminal & civil prosecution....but their work must be declared open and broadly.
Specifically not my post.
quote:
Licensure is an arm of government power and regulation.
Yes, hence why I mocked his suggestion to require it of a Constitutional freedom.
quote:
And the aim of the OP is that they want to remove section 230 protections from social media platforms and news stations
Then have Congress repeal the law.
This is what the letter actually said:
quote:
I am confident that once the ongoing transition is complete, the Administration and Congress will take broad ranging actions to restore the First Amendment rights that the Constitution grants to all Americans - and those actions can include both a review of your companies' activities as well as efforts by third-party organizations and groups that have acted to curtail those rights.
That does not sound like promoting smaller government, less governmental power, or reigning in the bureaucracy.
quote:
So less government oversight
The focus of this analysis is a disagreement over the ratings of NewsGuard. Do you really want a bureaucracy overseeing opinions and evaluations, generally? In what way is this "less government and oversight", as you posted?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News