re: Check out this X post from Trump’s FCC Chairman nominee.

quote:

---

I see we can now add irony and confused to that ever growing list of words you use incorrectly

---

Says the person promoting less regulation is promoting Leftist values.

quote:

---

further solidifying that you are an objectively stupid person.

---

At least I understand the terms being used, like leftism/leftist. You are very confused as to what those mean and now their values are manifested.

Leftism = promoting regulation over commerce

I am doing the exact opposite of this. Explain how I'm promoting "the talking points of his progressive deities" by specifically arguing against their values.

quote:

---

SFP really is the pigeon that plays chess...

---

Hes spot on here. While DOGE pretends its going to slash regulations, y'all are busy trying to implement far more.

its inanity, but your regulations will be better than theirs, somehow, eh?

quote:

---

SFP is trying to spin a thread that started with a Tommie Robinson rant against grooming gangs into being about illegal immigrants, and he gets pissy when I say that it's a shame that the Brits disarmed themselves because now they can't defend against this.

---

Wrong. The strawman is impressive. My actual comment:

quote:

---

Guns won't win this political debate (in the US or UK).

You have to convince voters to support your policies. That's how democracy works.

---

Then you responded

quote:

---

This isn't a political debate. It's self defense.

No different than US cops standing back and letting ANTIFA and BLM run free.

These migrants are having huge impacts on the local populace.

---

So I responded

quote:

---

How do you plan on using guns in "self defense", exactly?

Do you think the answer above will increase or decrease your chances of positively impacting your policies at the polls?

---

Then you dodged for a long before admitting you wanted violence.

Violence will not "positively impact your policies at the polls".

You kept incorrectly interjecting grooming gangs into the discussion when they were irrelevant to the discussion.

quote:

---

Then here he is spiking the football after I said that people should resort to violence to protect their children from grooming gangs.

---

Yes, because it proved my point.

Before you strawman it. I'll post it again:

quote:

---

Guns won't win this political debate (in the US or UK).

You have to convince voters to support your policies. That's how democracy works.

---

LINK to my post. Receipts

Here’s to you, DV losers! Russian collusion? Tradecraft on Hunter’s laptops? It’ll always be real to you!!

quote:

---

Says the person promoting less regulation is promoting Leftist values.

---

You aren’t promoting less regulation. You are promoting the continued selective regulation of the current system via the throttling of certain opinions and viewpoints. You are stupid enough to think other people aren’t fully aware this is happening.

quote:

---

At least I understand the terms being used, like leftism/leftist. You are very confused as to what those mean and now their values are manifested.

---

I have never used the terms leftism of leftist. You don’t know what the word confused means.

quote:

---

I am doing the exact opposite of this. Explain how I'm promoting "the talking points of his progressive deities" by specifically arguing against their values.

---

Because your progressive deities are the ones in charge of and/or using the platforms in question to selectively suppress certain people and/or belief systems, often at the behest of government agencies, and you are vehemently arguing against actions being taken to stop this from happening.

This is an incredibly simple concept. You just don’t understand it because you are an objectively stupid person.

quote:

---

You aren’t promoting less regulation. You are promoting the continued selective regulation of the current system

---

No. I promote less regulation. Full stop.

I am specifically anti-Leftist in that regard.

I'm specifically anti-MAGA in this regard as well, apparently.

quote:

---

via the throttling of certain opinions and viewpoints.

---

Private actors can act how they choose pursuant to the private contracts upon which they bind themselves.

I am against adding a layer of regulatory (federal, at that) oversight to private individuals agreeing to private contracts. I believe people can decide for themselves and don't need a Nanny state.

Again, this is specifically anti-Leftist.

quote:

---

I have never used the terms leftism of leftist.

---

You said progressive. Tomato/tomato scenario.

If you understood the terms being used, you'd understand this.

quote:

---

Because your progressive deities are the ones in charge of and/or using the platforms in question to selectively suppress certain people and/or belief systems

---

I don't personally agree with it, but I believe in the right of private actors to make their own choices. I'm not some authoritarian who wants to use government to punish private actors for making politically-based choices.

quote:

---

often at the behest of government agencies

---

Again, private actors voluntarily agreeing to work with government is their choice. That choice exists in a free society.

quote:

---

and you are vehemently arguing against actions being taken to stop this from happening.

---

Yes, I won't be swayed by emotional "won't someone think of the children" silliness to argue for government intrusion into our lives and the destruction of private liberty.

This is exactly why I am anti-Leftist/Progressive, because that's their move, especially in the economic arena.

quote:

---

This is an incredibly simple concept. You just don’t understand it because you are an objectively stupid person.

---

Again, says the person who is clearly confused as to what is Leftist/Progressive and what is not.

Regulating private actors' economic choices = Leftism/Progressivism.

I am against this.

quote:

---

Next, require all 'journalists' to be licensed; Those who report the news should be restricted to facts (or penalized).

---

Wr love our small government don’t we?

Maybe Trump can hire Jankowitz?

quote:

---

How can Big Tech prevent a person from speaking their minds?
——-
Did you miss all that time when the DHS and FBI employees were coordinating with Big Tech to quash right leaning voice circa 2020?

---

The problem here is government, not “big tech”. This can be stopped without regulating “big tech”. The fact that more government regulation and power seems to be the choice here… over stopping government coercion is… telling.


Patriot Act Ii.

quote:

---

What does that have to do with whether or not they're operating within pre-existing power structures or not?

---

This would be a new step in adding powers to that power structure.

quote:

---

I can't go and purchase unpasteurized milk from the Amish, apparently.

---

This isn't some gotcha. I don't believe in overregulation of food, either.

quote:

---

We're long past allowing consenting adults and private businesses to handle their own affairs.

---

Ay, comrade.