- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/6/26 at 8:50 pm to texag7
I didn’t want war but understand the reasoning and now want total regime change and not just third or fourth tier, or whatever tier of the same regime.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 8:54 pm to davyjones
quote:
We should pass out Bikinis to those ladies like it’s humanitarian aid.
100%
quote:
Luckily for us I don’t think we’re aiming at the babes.
Thankfully Orange has an eye for babes
And who were the Jihadis who downvoted me
Posted on 4/6/26 at 8:57 pm to Narax
quote:
They wanted Nukes and long range missiles, it's a threat to us if they get them.
They will use England’s once the takeover there is completed.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 8:59 pm to WylieTiger
Do you want to take a guess on who the Brits buys its Submarine launched nuclear missiles from?
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:01 pm to texag7
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:03 pm to texag7
I believe that success in this war will help prevent a war with China in 2027/2028.
I'd much rather change Venezuela, Iran, and Cuba than enter a war with troops against China.
I'd much rather change Venezuela, Iran, and Cuba than enter a war with troops against China.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:04 pm to texag7
Somewhere in the middle, I guess?
I didn’t support doing it initially and I don’t support doing it now or going forward. BUT if we’re going to do it, then I support doing it in as expeditious and effective a manner as possible.
If that means bombing their infrastructure at this point then so be it. But only if it means we actually accomplish something beyond just a more kinetic version of the 2000’s era strategy of kicking the can down the road.
I didn’t support doing it initially and I don’t support doing it now or going forward. BUT if we’re going to do it, then I support doing it in as expeditious and effective a manner as possible.
If that means bombing their infrastructure at this point then so be it. But only if it means we actually accomplish something beyond just a more kinetic version of the 2000’s era strategy of kicking the can down the road.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:10 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
They have survived for 6000 years, the US trying to make it to 250 years. American exceptionalism, LOL
I can’t imagine acting like the current regime is the same as thousands of years of genetics.
And I’m sorry, are you saying the USA isn’t the world leading power and the main producer of new tech, medicines, surgeries, and is the main reason for the light speed development across the globe over the last 100 years?
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:17 pm to texag7
In 1979 through the early 80s I was for it, now I’m kinda neutral leaning opposed
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:19 pm to texag7
Moab the mullahs.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:19 pm to Loserman
Do it
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:19 pm to texag7
Strategic strikes, absolutely. US boots on the ground, no.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:21 pm to texag7
It’s time to erase the Iran leadership
Enough is enough. If we are still dropping B2 bombs on houses 3 years
from now I’m good with it.
Enough is enough. If we are still dropping B2 bombs on houses 3 years
from now I’m good with it.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:22 pm to texag7
Daily check in loyalty test
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:28 pm to texag7
I still believe this rhetoric is misdirection and Trump is playing some guys against eachother. We will find out soon enough.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:32 pm to texag7
In. I don't think we are doing enough honestly. Either it's full regime change and install who we want or we should have never fricked with them at all. No in between. I think it's obvious the people want new leadership but they are kinda sitting on sidelines waiting to see how far we are gonna take this.
Our "allies" who stand to gain so much are usless and truly eye opening to the world. It's very apparent that it's the USA, China, russia really sitting at the poker table.
Our "allies" who stand to gain so much are usless and truly eye opening to the world. It's very apparent that it's the USA, China, russia really sitting at the poker table.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:33 pm to texag7
It sucks. All of it. But it didn’t just get this way. And unfortunately it needs to be dealt with. I find myself wanting more info and reasoning but you’ve got to remember this is still going on.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:47 pm to beerJeep
Didn't say the US was not great, at all.
Saying we are young and dumb compared to many others.
FYI, Cancer research funding cut by him, how is that leading the world in medicine now?
Saying we are young and dumb compared to many others.
FYI, Cancer research funding cut by him, how is that leading the world in medicine now?
Posted on 4/6/26 at 9:47 pm to texag7
In
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News