- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charlie was wearing body armor. Video Inside.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 1:56 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Posted on 9/12/25 at 1:56 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:Unless he was wearing level 4 plates it wouldn’t have mattered.
any kind of hard or soft armor.
It’s an older caliber, but I think people are really underestimating how powerful a 30-06 round is.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 1:56 pm to Crow Pie
quote:
to my knowledge there was no exit of the round?
Have you seen the autopsy report?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 1:57 pm to Crow Pie
So we have confirmation from his team (that nobody can link to) that he was wearing body armor that did not cover his nipples.
Seems legit.
Seems legit.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 1:58 pm to TigerBait1971
Not even his security team. If he was wearing armor, the shite would be all over the news.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:00 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
I'm shocked {not shocked} that nobody has provided something that would seem quite easy to link, after you've asked what, 4 times now
I already provided the Video. Here it is again. You will probably also ignore this video
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:00 pm to Mouth
I have said all along that this was ridiculous nonsense about body armor and deflection and all of that, but watched the video anyway. There is no doubt that what he suggested here is in fact, 100% what occurred. It is plain as day.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:01 pm to John Barron
I'm still upset about the shooting and don't care one way or the other. However, that video doesn't prove to me he was wearing a vest and until someone tells me how his man boobs and nipples were showing through his shirt, I'll believe he wasn't wearing one. That's all.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:01 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
It’s an older caliber, but I think people are really underestimating how powerful a 30-06 round is.

Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:01 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
A hole in the shirt wouldn't be dark blood colored anyways. You wouldn't even see a hole in the shirt.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:03 pm to Mouth
After watching this video and the original in slo-mo I think this guy is spot on.
I have enough experience in ballistics and armor plates to say this is very accurate.
I totally get the reason the plate was low profile, but unfortunately you just saw the drawbacks of this style of plate. Perhaps if he had been wearing a plate carrier it wouldn't have deflected but unfortunately we will never know.
Sad to say. Meant to be a life saving measure and 9 times out of 10 it would have been.
This whole deal just keeps getting more depressing.
I have enough experience in ballistics and armor plates to say this is very accurate.
I totally get the reason the plate was low profile, but unfortunately you just saw the drawbacks of this style of plate. Perhaps if he had been wearing a plate carrier it wouldn't have deflected but unfortunately we will never know.
Sad to say. Meant to be a life saving measure and 9 times out of 10 it would have been.
This whole deal just keeps getting more depressing.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:03 pm to John Barron
quote:
I already provided the Video. Here it is again. You will probably also ignore this video
Unless i'm missing something in your video, it very clearly does not provide any link or quotes from the Kirk team that he was wearing body armor, like is being asked. Maybe you just struggle with reading comprehension? It was flat out claimed that Kirk's team confirmed he was wearing a vest. All that is needed is any link to that statement and this entire discussion goes away. I really don't understand why this is so hard, considering how irrelevant the entire thing is anyways.
Want to try again?
This post was edited on 9/12/25 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:04 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
I'm still upset about the shooting and don't care one way or the other. However, that video doesn't prove to me he was wearing a vest and until someone tells me how his man boobs and nipples were showing through his shirt, I'll believe he wasn't wearing one. That's all.
Or how there are no visible lines whatsoever anywhere. Nothing on his shoulders, chest, or back. Or how he was able to bend his upper chest in different directions without being hindered whatsoever.
It’s literally the armor from Batman.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:04 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
people are really underestimating how powerful a 30-06 round is.
Yep. Falls in line between common rounds like the 308 and 300 WM. Maybe a level 3+ would stop a 30-06 at 200 yards, but you'd most likely need a level 4 plate and that would be easily seen.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:04 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
I think we are all missing that the style of plate caused a deflection. It most likely didn't penetrate the plate.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:04 pm to Fratigerguy
quote:
I have said all along that this was ridiculous nonsense about body armor and deflection and all of that, but watched the video anyway. There is no doubt that what he suggested here is in fact, 100% what occurred. It is plain as day.
I said the same thing but watched the video and it changed my mind. Pretty definitive.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:05 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
owever, that video doesn't prove to me he was wearing a vest and until someone tells me how his man boobs and nipples were showing through his shirt, I'll believe he wasn't wearing one.
I also fail to understand why it even matters?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:06 pm to John Barron
"That's what I was told. We'll see if that turns out to be true. It's hard to tell from the video".
That' NOT the same is "He was definitely wearing body armor".
Also... there ain't no body armor in this picture... which came directly from John Solomon's page... There is, however, a nipple...

That' NOT the same is "He was definitely wearing body armor".
Also... there ain't no body armor in this picture... which came directly from John Solomon's page... There is, however, a nipple...

Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:07 pm to Mouth
There’s video where you can clearly see imprints of his nipples through his shirt. He wasn’t wearing plates or any kind. He took a 30-06 to the throat delivered by a psychopath.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:08 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:Time for me to get a new RX.
Every picture from every angle.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 2:09 pm to ElDawgHawg
quote:
It most likely didn't penetrate the plate.
There. Was. No. Plate.
Popular
Back to top



3









