- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charlie Kirk was shot by a drone?
Posted on 10/16/25 at 2:51 pm to DesertFox
Posted on 10/16/25 at 2:51 pm to DesertFox
quote:
Ahh ok, thanks. I was careful about the videos I watched because I didn't particularly wanna see that.
Just to keep the flame alive, the video I saw showed people pointing NOT in the direction of the alleged shooter.
I also appreciated the effort the guy i watched put into the meticulously explaining why there is a zero percent chance the bullet doesn't exit based on the angle from the alleged location of the shot.
I don't believe in a drone theory, but I'm not convinced Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger.
0
Posted on 10/16/25 at 2:52 pm to FLTech
quote:
I made my rounds across YouTube last night and came across several videos from pretty legit people saying that they are hearing that Kirk was shot by a drone and the gay trans dude was a decoy
I’m not 100% sold in it so I won’t post videos but has anyone else heard about this?
So, after reading some stuff on the internet, you're 75 % sold? 85 % sold? What's the going acceptace rate for wild conspiracies from "pretty legit" people on the internet? You still thinking the Moon landing was a hoax, or is that up to 95 % now?
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 10/16/25 at 2:54 pm to YMCA
quote:
So how do you convince some young guy to take the fall for killing Charlie so you can do it by drone instead
Off the top spit ball, you have him "scout" a location, or maybe you even get him to do the deed, then take the shot when he's up there.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 2:55 pm to 3down10
quote:
Old school tankers call modern tankers(80's to present) CDATs, which means computerized dumb arse tankers for these very reasons. They don't have to calculate any of those things, it's just point and click. The computer will do everything else for you. It's extremely simple.
Yes a tank with a blast radius of 20 meters in an open field can easily aim at the direction of a human being and kill it.
A drone flying in the air shooting a bullet to a precise position while also being undetected by anyone in the crowd and also being low enough to the ground to shoot a target underneath a tent... Not so much.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 3:01 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:given we know nothing of the structure of the bullet used, there is no way to have an opinion on this.
Personally, I do not believe what we saw was an exit wound from a 30.06.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 3:03 pm to FLTech
quote:
they are hearing that Kirk was shot by a drone
Was Damar Hamlin flying the drone?
Posted on 10/16/25 at 3:31 pm to Tantal
It was a stealth drone. Predator technology.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 3:33 pm to FLTech
"pretty legit people" but not 1 link.
Sure, Jan.
Sure, Jan.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:24 pm to dgnx6
quote:
No it’s not and you are retarded. The fricking ring doorbell camera caught the guy earlier scoping the spot out. Then caught him again limping with pants on because the rifle was down his pants
None of this proves that he acted on his own without any help or coaching.
Retard
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:40 pm to FLTech
Do I think he was shot with a drone, No. Do I think they have the technology to do this, yes. But not in front of that many ppl and be undetected.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:44 pm to Ponchy Tiger
Google searches conducted in ISRAEL and Washington D.C. in June and July about the hospital and surgeons at the hospital in Utah Charlie KIrk was taken to. Nothing suspicious there...smh
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:03 pm to jrodLSUke
quote:
I saw a detailed video that debunked the drone claim. Turns out that it was a bird. :/
I heard it was a plane....
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:12 pm to Hognutz
quote:
Google searches conducted in ISRAEL and Washington D.C. in June and July about the hospital and surgeons at the hospital in Utah Charlie KIrk was taken to. Nothing suspicious there...smh
Good Lord
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:17 pm to FLTech
No.
Really don't understand why dumbass conspiracy theories are needed here. LGBT people are constantly shooting up shite and killing people.
May as well say every LGBT shooting is a conspiracy theory, and those poor LGBT people were framed. Maybe bigfoot controlling a satellite laser was responsible for the Covington shooting.
Really don't understand why dumbass conspiracy theories are needed here. LGBT people are constantly shooting up shite and killing people.
May as well say every LGBT shooting is a conspiracy theory, and those poor LGBT people were framed. Maybe bigfoot controlling a satellite laser was responsible for the Covington shooting.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 9:28 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
I do not believe what we saw was an exit wound from a 30.06.
No way it was a 30-06. I have killed many deer, elk, and other animals with various bullets from one and none of the entry or exit wounds were anything like what was in the videos. And no, there is no way a human neck would have stopped the bullet. It was something with a lot less energy.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 9:56 pm to FLTech
FFS
Posted on 10/16/25 at 10:21 pm to FLTech
We have drones with cloaking devices.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 5:21 am to FLTech
How, if I may ask, did you determine that these people were "pretty legit"? They sound like all other conspiracy pumpers on the internet right now. Just throw out stuff, with no evidence, and let people's imaginations go to work. Then, when presented with clear evidence that their theories are wrong, most just say that the evidence is faked. So they set up an unfalsifiable bubble of disbelief in whatever contradicts them, that they can live in indefinitely.
This post was edited on 10/17/25 at 5:25 am
Posted on 10/17/25 at 6:29 am to FLTech
quote:
I’m not 100% sold in it
JFC.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 6:34 am to deltadummy
quote:I'm up to about 33.3257% sure atm.
You still thinking the Moon landing was a hoax, or is that up to 95 % now?
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News