Favorite team:
Location:Illinois
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1837
Registered on:11/5/2018
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Came here to find out what 'eating sleep for dinner' means.

No luck yet.


+1. My guess is, going to bed without dinner?
I don't like wearing a watch, so the only jewelry I wear is my wedding ring.

I always carry a pocket knife, does that count as 'jewelry'?

re: Pictures from days gone by....

Posted by MidWestGuy on 1/3/26 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Man, you just don't see a good trailer park like these much anymore.


Tornadoes got 'em.
quote:

All it would take to convince me we can go would be to send a life ( dog , cat , rat , mouse whatever , into the radiation belt and back to earth. If that animal is still alive , I would be more inclined to at least believe we CAN go .


Ummm, help me jump across the massive logical gap you just presented.

A) You don't believe that any astronauts made it out of low Earth orbit.

B) But you are willing to believe that it can be done if we sent some animals?

Why wouldn't you claim the animal mission was fake?

Would you believe that the Soviets sent animals:

LINK

quote:

In September 1968 Zond 5 carried the first Earth lifeforms, including two tortoises, to travel around the Moon and return safely.
quote:

I don’t know how much clearer I can be about this, I don’t think they faked the moon landing. What’s not getting through to you about that?

I’m simply stating that I would not put it past the government to lie about it.


It's fine to be skeptical. It's fine to think the government *could* want to lie about it.

But any serious review of the information makes it clear that it was not faked. At that point, give up the skepticism. Why keep up they "they could", when it's clear they didn't?
quote:

They also communicated to Earth, from the Moon, in 1969, yet...in 2025, we can't get cell reception in certain areas and can't get DirecTV when it rains.
Another post that has me wondering if the 'deniers' are serious, trolling, or ?

If you are serious, you'd do a modicum of research yourself, and question your own statements. As another poster replied, there is a massive difference between covering all areas with cell reception, and doing it at a monthly price people can afford, using a $200 receiver with a tiny internal omnidirectional antenna, versus getting signal from the moon.

So, if you are serious, do some research, and come back and explain to us the difference between the tiny omnidrectional antenna, and the kind of high gain antenna used for Apollo communications. That would be a start to you understanding that your 'gothchas' are not.

Hint: The Apollo mission land based antennas will not fit in your pocket. It's like saying that since a John Deere garden tractor can only go 5 mph, that the Bugatti Chiron can't possibly exist. They are just very different things, with different design goals and budgets.

I'll await your reply.

re: Mouse in car

Posted by MidWestGuy on 12/31/25 at 10:24 am to
Snap traps, not glue traps (it's gross dealing with a stuck, live mouse - snap kills 'em quick). Get a dozen traps, the more the better, you want to get *all* the mice in the area, as quickly as possible. Set 4 in the car, a couple under the hood, and the rest all around the car. Any place they might hide.

I like to attach the trap to a long, thin board, then you can slip it into and out of places that are hard to reach, mice like to hide out there. Put them in the path along walls.

And you didn't address a single point I made.
quote:

quote:
I have paid north of $10,000 over the past several years at filing time.



How bad are you at taxes that you've owed that much, repeatedly, years on end?


Right, there's going to be some big penalties at that rate. I always try to get it down to me owing a couple hundred. I might have to change the withholding later in the year as I get a better handle on total income.
I'll have some small satisfaction for my IL State income tax this tax year.

IL does not tax retirement income (yet), and pension, SS, and IRA w/d cover most of our spending. The rest is dividends and some LTCG if I need to sell some stocks. This year, I offset that with 529 contribution to our 5 grand-kids, so IL should be a net zero after all credits/deductions.

Of course, we still pay a ridiculous property tax and high sales tax, but it's something.
quote:

The super rich like Trump gross millions every year and yeah they file a tax return BUT they still pay little to NO TAXES !

Educate yourself.

There is a difference between "gross" income and "taxable" income.

Clearly, Trump hasn't broken any laws with regards to his own personal income tax filings, or that would be on 24/7 (his company was charged, and it's being appealed).

If you take $400 out of your checking account for walking around cash, should you be taxed on it again? No, you already paid tax on it. If you sell an investment, you pay tax on the gains, not the gross sale amount.

Come back after educating yourself.

Oh yea, how about the super rich Democrats? They get a pass for doing the same (or worse)?
quote:

FWIW we did have total negative net migration this year

Even the MSM admits this (sort of buried in their mish-mash of data and very weird collage graphic at the open):

LINK <<<< nbcnews

Looks like ~ 10K 'encounters' / month recently, and ~ 15K deportations. Not sure if that includes self-deportations (I guess no record of that?).
104! Wow! I was on the edge of my seat, afraid he'd miss a note. Man, he did a great job, great tone, vibrato. Nailed it.
quote:

The post highlights Germany's Catholic membership crisis, where roughly 322,000 people left in 2024 (one every 98 seconds per official data)


98 seconds??? I'd have left after 9 point 8 seconds.

quote:

Eva Vlaardingerbroek is an OT 10 IMO.


LINK
Also weird that they zoom into a park in Chicago:

LINK
quote:

Have presents on the tree.


Yep, that makes no sense. I swear I always heard that as "presents 'round the tree".

quote:

Okay, apart from the aqueduct and the sanitation, which, I'll give you.


Numerals? Never mind, the only thing they're good for is fancy clocks, and Super Bowls, and not even Super Bowls.
quote:

I'll ask again: 60+ years on from 9 flawless moon visits do you think we can do it even once without a major problem this time?


Same answer - it's not a meaningful question.

If we were to land men on the moon again, the mission could have serious problems, or not. So?

Your "nine flawless" ignores the many space missions with problems. There's no guarantees with space flight. Again, there's no logic to "if we fail on the next attempt, the other attempts didn't happen".

quote:

You realize this is mostly due to the fact that the earth is spherical, right? RIGHT?!
quote:

I have heard that , obviously. The logical question would be. … why would the amount of power affect the distance. ? You would just be blasting it off the surface . Any size transmitter would get you miles . But the bigger the transmitter … the more the curvature of the earth doesn’t matter .
And a signal from the surface of the moon. ? 240000 miles ? That’s thirty earths away. But no problem. A deep cycle marine battery can handle that distance



This is why we don't take you deniers seriously - you don't take yourself seriously. If you were serious, you'd do a bit of research to understand what you are questioning.

Some points to educate yourself about:

A) Radio waves (somewhat depending on frequency) are "line of sight". Yes, curvature of the Earth matters.

B) A distance of 240,000 miles is do-able. It's in a near vacuum, very little attenuation. And on Earth, they were using large directional antennas (usually parabolic dishes), pointed directly at the moon. Makes a huge difference compared to a typical TV antenna.

Here's a discussion among same ham radio guys that were around at the time. Note that it was not too difficult for amateurs to pick up the signals from the moon. It was much harder, near impossible, to pick up the signals from the ground station. Because they didn't have a direct line-of-site to the ground station, but they had direct line-of-site to the moon. Being 240,000 miles away was not the issue, line-of-site was.

LINK

leads to: LINK

LINK




We never know how fake these are. And what is the context? How many *did* take the silver? It's easy to be set up such that everyone would figure the silver bar is fake. Not sure I'd take chocolate from some stranger on the street either.