Favorite team:
Location:Illinois
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2039
Registered on:11/5/2018
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:


Has everything to do with the entitlement of a zipper merge suggestion on the roadway


Huh? That's some Kamala level word salad there. "entitlement of a zipper merge suggestion"?
quote:

these are the consequences of what stupid people think because its a zipper situation that they are going above and beyond to be dickheads and try to cut in front of people at the very last moment flying up when they weren't even here long after their lane ended and they think they have a right of way to fricking hit you and not be at fault.


That's an argument against stupid drivers, not the 'zipper merge' - that's why I said it's a 'straw man'.

Anyone who thinks "they have a right of way to fricking hit you and not be at fault" is in the wrong in any situation. Has nothing to do with 'zipper merges'.

quote:

I view zipper merge like cutting in line.


You are wrong. Educate yourself on the topic. Seems that most people are just like me, we thought those people were 'cutting in line', until we read about the advantages of the zipper merge, and why traffic dept recommend it.

quote:

We seem to be normalizing poor behavior. Screw the warning sign, rush to the front of the line and butt in.

Take the signs down if you want people to take part in this dumbed down driving manuver.

It's not poor behavior, it's proper behavior. The signs are a warning that you need to merge ahead - do they say "merge NOW"?

I agree that you should not 'rush to the front of the line' - I avoid that so I don't look like I'm just cutting in - I approach slowly if the lane is empty.

Because so many people don't understand this, they really should have signs promoting the zipper merge to make it clear. They sometimes do, but we need it all the time - or send notices to every DL holder, and make them sign and acknowledge, or lose their DL. Then no one can claim ignorance. It should be on every driver test.

I need a sign to put in the right side window - "I'm ZIPPER MERGING - NOT 'CUTTING IN LINE - GOOGLE IT"
quote:

They have no right of way to hit you.

Straw man argument. Of course no one has a right to hit you, geez.

The zipper merge is about merging, utilizing the available open space, and improving traffic flow. If you hit someone, that's on you.

Where does this even come from?
quote:

I like to think of myself as a very observant and knowledgeable driver
quote:

this thread is the first time I've ever heard of zipper merging.

This is a contradiction. A "very observant and knowledgeable driver" would certainly be aware of the 'zipper merge', its advantages, and how to handle it.

re: K9 1, Muslim immigrant 0

Posted by MidWestGuy on 8/17/26 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Bet he won’t do that again, fricking idiot


I'm not so sure - he didn't seem to be realizing that the more he fought/resisted, the harder that dog was going on him.

Very slow learner.
quote:

If we are going to do this why don’t we just get rid of US time zones as well, so I don’t have to do math on meeting availability


There is a historical precedence for this. In today's connected world, the entire world should switch to UTC ('Greenwich Mean Time').

The historical precedence is the train system in the US. Before trains connected cities with faster travel, and schedules, each city was on its own time zone - high noon, as measured by the sun.

Fast travel made that a mess. You'd need to reset your watch at every stop to keep up. So they consolidated time zones to minimize the problem (but created other problems). Today, we are instantly connected with any point on the Earth. If we all used the same system, then coordinating conference calls would be far simpler. No confusion over "what time is it where you are".

Sure, different areas would eat dinner at a different time, but I think you'd get used to that.

re: Jason Arday Dead

Posted by MidWestGuy on 8/16/26 at 10:57 am to
Also from wiki:

quote:

In 2026, media sources reported allegations that Arday had plagiarised some of his writings, falsified research, and made false claims in his academic and personal history. Arday called the allegations "cruel" and acknowledged mistakes in his work,

Oh, he didn't say they were wrong - just that it was "cruel". There's that 'victim mentality' for you!

re: Jason Arday Dead

Posted by MidWestGuy on 8/16/26 at 10:48 am to
quote:

making him the youngest full professor in Cambridge’s history before even published anything


Sounds a bit (OK, a *lot*) like giving someone the Nobel Peace Prize, before even doing anything.

re: The "tax the rich" ideaology.

Posted by MidWestGuy on 7/21/26 at 11:45 am to
quote:

society and economy can’t function properly when most of the wealth wealth is concentrated in an extremely small percentage of the population.
Only an extremely small percentage of the population is capable of producing wealth. It seems reasonable that the concentration of wealth would be concentrated in this group. They also know how to leverage it for more production.

--------------------------------------------------
Most of my career was engineering support of production lines. I interfaced with the lowest level assembly line person (many were hard working and fairly bright), to the R&D 'braniacs' and top level managers and marketing/sales people.

Everyone was needed to function. The 'braniac' was not going to sit on an assembly line (and it would waste their talents). No group could do the other groups job. If you took the companies funds, and divided it up, the assembly line people couldn't create wealth with it - they didn't have the knowledge, often not the capability or motivation. We *need* to let the elite *be* elite, or we all lose.
quote:

quote:

Tax the rich, feed the poor
'til there are no rich no more

Unfortunately this is nothing new

I dunno, I'm a cynic, and I always took that as a cynical statement, to say that when there are no rich, who is left to feed the poor?

You taxed prosperity to extinction, and now all you have is poor. The money's all been distributed, and those who actually know how to produce wealth won't bother. Where's all the 'new' money come from? If the poor knew how to be productive, they wouldn't need help being fed, they wouldn't be poor. Basically, "Atlas Shrugged" played out in a few lines of a song.

re: Slash, hold my beer

Posted by MidWestGuy on 7/6/26 at 10:38 am to
quote:

quote:
Shredded on a Schecter....but it does look close to a Strat or Tele.


I caught that after I posted about it being a Strat. I'll not edit though because I still stand impressed.


Yes, leave it. "Strat" has become shorthand for any Stratocaster style guitar (which Fender is fighting now, but like "Kleenex", I think that train has left the station, long after their patents expired).

But yep, good tone for the song.
The AP headlne is 'interesting'. When I read it, I thought Pelosi was hit, and the other guy ran. Often, a hit and run means you don't have the guy in custody that did the 'hit. They don't come out and say that Pelosi was the one that hit the car, they say he was 'involved' in a hit-and-run.

quote:

Paul Pelosi in hit-and-run in California, car left with major damage, authorities say

The husband of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was involved in a hit-and-run in California that left a parked car with “major” damage authorities said Saturday, and he could face misdemeanor charges.


So if a guy wearing a MAGA hat shot up a place and killed a dozen people, would they report that so-and-so was 'involved' in a shooting?
quote:

I do not want any kid to be hungry. I want all kids to live happy and carefree lives. If we feed some cheats so that the underprivileged will get what they need then so be it.


OK, but let's fix the problem, the parents/cheats.

Take the kids away from them, put the parents on some kind of community service program to pay back the cheat, and sterilize the parents so they can't produce more kids they won't take responsibility for.
I found a reference to that stat years ago, can't find it now, but it was a ridiculously loose definition of 'hunger'. Something like:

Have you, or anyone in your household, in the past 6 months:

1) Had to skip a meal due to lack of funds (that you spent on cigarettes, booze, or drugs instead)?

---Ahhh I found it "food insecurity" is their buzzword-salad for "hunger" ...

Copyright 2013
Texas Food Bank Network
All Rights Reserved
Texas Food Bank Network
1524 South IH­35, Ste. 342
Austin, TX 78704
Phone 512­527­3613
Fax 512­382­9742

quote:

What is Food Insecurity? How many Texans are “food insecure”? According to the latest USDA report, an average 18.4% of Texas households experienced food insecurity in the years 2010­2012. Texas ranks among the top twelve states in terms of food insecurity rates, and second in terms of the number of food insecure households. Using related data, the national group Feeding America has estimated the number of individuals and children who lived in these households in 2010 in every Texas county.

What does “food insecure” mean? Food insecurity is the most broadly­ used measure of food deprivation in the United States. The USDA defines food insecurity as meaning “consistent access to adequate food is limited by a lack of money and other resources at times during the year.” Acceptable shorthand terms for food insecurity are “hungry, or at risk of hunger,” and “hungry, or faced the threat of hunger.” Food insecurity can also accurately be described as “a financial juggling act, where sometimes the food ball gets dropped.”

What does “food insecure” NOT mean? Food insecurity is not “the government’s definition of hunger.” It is a broader term that captures outright hunger and the coping mechanisms that households use to avoid hunger. Food insecurity is a household situation, not an individual situation. While food insecurity affects everyone in a household, it may affect them differently. Therefore it is not correct to state that specific individuals in a food insecure household (such as children) definitely experience outright hunger or specific coping mechanisms. Rather than describing these individuals as being “food insecure”, they should be referred to as “living in a food insecure home.” Food insecurity is a year­long measure. Therefore, it is not correct to assert that every food insecure household is experiencing food insecurity “right now,” will experience hunger “tonight” or “does not know where their next meal is coming from.” Research shows that food insecurity tends to be episodic and often cyclical. Food insecurity does not mean that a household lacks access to grocery stores, lives in a “food desert,” or does not have time to shop/cook. It only refers to lack of food access based on financial and other material resources.
quote:

TOP 10 Tips for Dating with a girl in Slovenia

Had a young Slovakian

Slovenia != (not equal sign) Slovakia.
quote:

There wouldn't be any cotton to pick on June 19 in any year past or present.


I missed making /reading any comments here on the 3rd of June.

I probably have mentioned this before, but grew up on a farm in Northern IL. Was a young teen when this song came out. I figured the songwriter was from California. Of course we didn't grow cotton, but I couldn't imagine harvesting cotton in June, even in the warmer South.

Many years later, I learned that Bobbie Gentry really was from the South, and "choppin' cotton', wasn't harvesting it, it was weeding it. Now it all fits.

Fantastic song, and beautiful, hot, talented lady.


quote:

Ode to Billie Joe - Bobbie Gentry

Was the third of June, another sleepy, dusty Delta day

I was out choppin' cotton, and my brother was balin' hay


My favorite performance, oddly, from the Andy Williams show (most would be too young to remember that show). A little more emotional than the single:



quote:

when Elon Musk inexplicably (?patriotically?) elected to cash Tesla shares, fully exposed to tax, in order to buy Twitter. Obtaining a simple loan against his shares would have cost vastly less while preserving his holdings.

It's possible that no financial institution wanted to loan out a large enough amount against the shares that Elon had. Tesla stock was extremely volatile, and not diversified. Not a great holding to use as collateral. I have an LOC that I've used occasionally for some short term cash flow needs, to avoid selling appreciated shares and incurring cap gains tax. My collateral was broad index funds, essentially a Beta of one vs 'the market'.

Let's see, AI says:
quote:


At the exact time Elon Musk finalized his purchase of Twitter on October 27, 2022, his net worth was estimated to be between $204 billion and $212 billion.

and...

How the $44 Billion Deal Was Funded - Musk did not pay the entire amount out of pocket; instead, he assembled a leveraged buyout package consisting of personal wealth, loans, and outside investments:$27.7 billion in personal equity: Funded largely by selling billions of dollars worth of his personal Tesla stock

more to the point:
quote:

Why didn't Musk borrow against his Tesla shares?

Elon Musk initially planned to take out a $12.5 billion margin loan against his Tesla shares to finance the Twitter buyout. ... The primary reasons Musk chose not to borrow against his Tesla stock include:

1. Risk of a "Margin Call" A margin loan requires the borrower to maintain a specific collateral value. Under the original terms, banks required Musk to back the loan with Tesla stock worth five times the loan amount. Between April and May 2022, Tesla's stock price plummeted by roughly 30% to 40%. Had Tesla's stock dropped further, banks would have triggered a margin call.This would have forced Musk to either instantly inject billions in cash or watch the banks forcibly sell off his Tesla shares at rock-bottom prices to cover the gap.

2. Tesla Corporate Borrowing RulesTesla’s board maintains a strict corporate policy to protect the company from executive leverage. At the time, Tesla rules limited major shareholders from borrowing more than 25% of the total value of any pledged shares. Because Musk had already pledged over 90 million shares to secure older, personal loans before the Twitter bid, he was running out of unpledged stock to legally use as collateral under Tesla’s guidelines.
For reference, I can borrow ~ 55% of my stocks current value. Banks limited Elon to 20%, and as shown above, that would have been risky for the bank.
Imagine a Democrat mayor saying this today, or any Mayor for that matter:

LINK

Chicago Mayor Daley, 1968:

quote:

Daley issued a directive that going forward authorities should “shoot to kill any arsonist or anyone with a Molotov cocktail in his hand because they are potential murderers” and “shoot to maim or cripple anyone looting any stores in our city.”
Penrod:
quote:

my managers will harvest losses to offset some of the gains and then reinvest in similar stocks so I don’t lose out on the opportunity of the low share prices


quote:

This isn't legal unless they're waiting the required 30 day waiting period necessary to allow the loss offset. I'm sure that's what you meant.


You are talking "wash sales" rules. But they don't apply to buying back a 'similar' stock, only if you buy back the same stock/fund. There's some vague wording there that has never been tested, and that is "substantially identical". So it's not clear if I sell one S&P500 fund, and purchase another, if it is a wash or not. AFAIK, no one has had a sale be deemed a 'wash sale' unless it was actually identical.

And it is a 61 day window (30 days before and after), to be exact.