- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
MidWestGuy
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | Illinois |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1798 |
| Registered on: | 11/5/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: The left keeps saying we cannot imprison our way out of crime.
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/28/25 at 9:55 am to 4cubbies
quote:
That’s not what evidence indicates but that doesn’t stop Americans from frothing at the bit at the thought of locking someone in a cage for 500 years.
quote:
The threat of criminal penalties is therefore only significant if an individual believes there is a high risk of being caught for committing a crime. But since most crimes, whether minor property offenses or serious violent crimes, don’t in fact result in arrest and conviction, there is little reason for most potential offenders to consider the severity of penalties.
LINK
So we are in agreement?
Enforce the laws, have a well staffed police force to catch the criminals, and a judicial system to provide swift consequences to the guilty, and most potential offenders *will* consider the severity of penalties?
Glad we got that cleared up.
re: Trump considering cutting income tax in the US due to tariff income
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/28/25 at 9:46 am to cubsfan5150
quote:
Nosevens - to cubsfan5150: Yes minority as majority of people doesn’t pay taxes or worse, they receive additional returns above their non paying
quote:
Do you have statistics for that?
I'll do some looking, but it takes a deep dive - the typical stats don't tell the whole story.
You'll see the % of income paid by the different groups, *but*, that is just for filers (many with low income owe no tax and don't need to file). Far more distorting are the returns that receive an overall net *credit* are not counted in those stats.
And be careful of those stats, many don't distinguish between a *refund* (net tax paid), and a *credit* a negative net tax).
It's pretty easy to find the stats that the bottom half of *filers* pay only ~ 3% of the total FIT. So it sure isn't a stretch to think that adding those with credits and non-filers would push that to a majority that pay no FIT.
re: The left keeps saying we cannot imprison our way out of crime.
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/27/25 at 9:57 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Obviously crimes of passion aren’t committed with consequences in mind.
So, if they face some extreme lock up, maybe they *will* have consequences in mind before committing the next act?
re: ICE arrests woman with family ties to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/27/25 at 9:36 am to jrobic4
quote:
Why can't they just say sister-in-law?!
That would imply they were married. Apparently, her brother never married this woman. Or they would use that term.
Do you call your brother's ex-girlfriend your "sister-in-law"?
re: Big Democratic cities are an utter nightmare.
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/24/25 at 4:39 pm to weagle1999
quote:
Reporter Maher Kawash
Just another Illinois farmboy
Actually, not far off. He went to Plainfield HS, Plainfield is a far SW suburb, and there's farmland around there. Graduated Eastern IL Uni, also a pretty rural area.
re: NJ woman staged her own political attack.
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/20/25 at 9:14 pm to Wildcat1996
What was she hoping to gain from this? That's extreme, there must be some kind of game plan (not likely to make any sense, but there must be something)?
re: Trump: "I'm the very first former McDonald's fry cook ever to become President"
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/18/25 at 8:12 am to stout
Has anyone ever done a deep dive into Kamala's claim she worked at McDonald's?
The story about 'no records' isn't very persuasive, each place is a franchise, McDonald's corporate wouldn't have records of the employees of each and every franchise, and I wouldn't expect a franchisee to keep records of every part time summer worker for that long.
But... when someone becomes famous, every person who knew them growing up comes out of the woodwork to 'brag' about it, or just seek attention. Kamala would have had co-workers and friends that would have remembered here, some are probably rabid-left wing libs today, so would be jumping up and down, waving their hands, "I knew her back then!!!!".
Yet, all I've heard of was, her friend says she remembers Kamala's deceased mother 'mentioning it' at some point. That's all.
Might seem trivial, but if she would lie about that...
The story about 'no records' isn't very persuasive, each place is a franchise, McDonald's corporate wouldn't have records of the employees of each and every franchise, and I wouldn't expect a franchisee to keep records of every part time summer worker for that long.
But... when someone becomes famous, every person who knew them growing up comes out of the woodwork to 'brag' about it, or just seek attention. Kamala would have had co-workers and friends that would have remembered here, some are probably rabid-left wing libs today, so would be jumping up and down, waving their hands, "I knew her back then!!!!".
Yet, all I've heard of was, her friend says she remembers Kamala's deceased mother 'mentioning it' at some point. That's all.
Might seem trivial, but if she would lie about that...
re: So, Tulsi Has 20 Whistleblowers Lined Up Regarding the Russia Hoax?
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/17/25 at 8:58 am to KCT
Help me out here, please. Where does Tulsi say anything about "20 whistleblowers"?
From the transcript, the Fox reporter says "Gabbard got her hands on a House intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over 2,000 hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctorred the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election.".
Then the youtube creator says: "Holy freaking moly. 20 former CIA and FBI insiders are now blowing the whistle and they're pointing the finger directly at Barack Obama. ".
They were interviewed, that doesn't make them "whistleblowers", even if the interview came up with incriminating info (but we don't even know that for a fact yet).
Of course, if Obama was really involved in using gov resources to manufacture false info to hurt Trump in the election, he needs to go to jail, maybe even tried for treason. But does 'whistleblower' fit here?
From the transcript, the Fox reporter says "Gabbard got her hands on a House intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over 2,000 hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctorred the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election.".
Then the youtube creator says: "Holy freaking moly. 20 former CIA and FBI insiders are now blowing the whistle and they're pointing the finger directly at Barack Obama. ".
They were interviewed, that doesn't make them "whistleblowers", even if the interview came up with incriminating info (but we don't even know that for a fact yet).
Of course, if Obama was really involved in using gov resources to manufacture false info to hurt Trump in the election, he needs to go to jail, maybe even tried for treason. But does 'whistleblower' fit here?
re: Would you lie during voir dire, to get onto a jury?
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/14/25 at 8:29 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Would you be willing to lie during voir dire, in an attempt to get a place on that jury?
I don't think I could ever bring myself to do that.
But I don't doubt that there are some people who would do it, in order to get on the jury. Especially since one person can result in a hung jury, that may be their goal. They want the accused to get off. They think the law doesn't apply to 'them', so they will interfere with it to get their way (like the 'mostly peaceful protestors' interfering with ICE agents).
re: So..if Trump is truly in the Epstein files in a bad way (he is not)...
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/13/25 at 1:29 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Now how about answering the real question? Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files. He, his followers, and the right wing echo chamber talked about it constantly.
Do a google search with the time frame limited to *before* the election. You don't get many real hits at all. Here's one from The Hill:
LINK
quote:
Former President Trump in a new interview said he would have “no problem” releasing more files around Jeffrey Epstein if he is elected.
Trump was asked about it in an interview, and gave this tepid reply. That's a long, long way from "campaigned on it" and "talked about it constantly".
Try again, with something credible.
re: Elon Musk.,,the trillion dollar man!
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/9/25 at 12:36 pm to riccoar
quote:
Imagine if he paid taxes like us common folk.
quote:
He does. He also creates a ton of new jobs.
The Top 1% folks pay 40% of income taxes
The Top 5% folks pay 61% of income taxes
The Bottom 50% of taxpayers paying income taxes pay 3% of all income taxes.
It's actually worse than that. Those stats don't include the many filers who get a *credit*. That would shift the stat considerably.
from AI:
quote:
The exact number of filers who had their total credits (especially refundable ones) exceed their total payments (withholding and other payments) is difficult to pinpoint with publicly available data, as the IRS primarily reports total numbers of refunds issued and specific credit recipients.
However, data indicates this occurs for a significant number of taxpayers, largely due to refundable tax credits which can result in a "negative" tax liability (meaning the government pays the filer more than they paid in). Key data points in recent years (Tax Year 2022 and Fiscal Year 2024): About 23 million eligible workers and families received the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for Tax Year 2022, a primary refundable credit. For Fiscal Year 2024, nearly 14.3 million tax refunds included a refundable Child Tax Credit and more than 21.4 million included a refundable EITC.
A report from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation indicated that 31% of tax filers owed no federal income tax in 2022 after credits and deductions were applied.
Some analyses suggest that when including refundable tax credits, a significant portion of the lowest-earning taxpayers (e.g., the bottom 50% of earners) effectively face a negative federal income tax rate overall, meaning they receive a net transfer from the government via the tax system. These figures demonstrate that many millions of filers receive a net credit from their Federal Income Tax, particularly those in lower-to-middle income brackets who are eligible for significant refundable credits.
re: Rand Paul wants you to be 70 before you can draw Social Security
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/7/25 at 9:12 am to stout
It's been said a few times, but this is a long thread and bears repeating.
This statistic is not the right one to apply:
That is LE at birth. Someone who hasn't paid a penny into SS, many of who will not only never reach retirement age, but never even reach working age.
The relevant statistic is for someone who has attained the age of 70, how long are they expected to live? That table says age 84 for males, 86 for females. So 14/16 years on average.
And it isn't a matter of 'luck,' roughly(*) half will exceed that age. And no doubt life-style comes into play, a 70 YO pack-a-day guy probably won't make it much longer.
(*): it's not a 'median' number, so the distribution is skewed, but probably close
This statistic is not the right one to apply:
quote:LINK
The life expectancy for an American today is 78.4 years. So he wants Americans to enjoy only 8 years of peace (if you’re lucky) before you die.
******BZZZZZZZTTTTTTT!!!!!! WRONG!!!!!!******
That is LE at birth. Someone who hasn't paid a penny into SS, many of who will not only never reach retirement age, but never even reach working age.
The relevant statistic is for someone who has attained the age of 70, how long are they expected to live? That table says age 84 for males, 86 for females. So 14/16 years on average.
And it isn't a matter of 'luck,' roughly(*) half will exceed that age. And no doubt life-style comes into play, a 70 YO pack-a-day guy probably won't make it much longer.
(*): it's not a 'median' number, so the distribution is skewed, but probably close
re: Illinois Democrats want to tax all of your entertainment
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/4/25 at 8:56 pm to Kreg Jennings
quote:
So they are or they aren’t currently proposing to tax 401(k) and pension plans?
I don't think there is any actual 'proposal', just 'concern'.
It will be 'interesting' - currently IL has a 4.95% State income tax. But SS, 401-K/IRA, and pension income is not taxed as income by IL.
But if they decide to tax pension income, the public unions (like the teacher's union) will have a hissy-fit, and claim their pension is IL Constitutionally protected. So would IL tax private pension income, and not tax public pension income? Hmmm.
Note that for IL teachers (and some others), their IL pension is *in place of* Social Security - they don't pay into SS and they get no SS benefits (unless they paid into SS in a different job - then there are other WEP/GPO rules).
re: Check out NYC’s ballot for today’s election…
Posted by MidWestGuy on 11/4/25 at 5:07 pm to Eurocat
quote:
1. ID IS required. I voted this AM and had to show ID with my address on it.
So tell us there is more to this story. Or tell us that the NYC voter web page is lying. Or tell us you are the one who is lying:
LINK
quote:
Voter ID
Registered voters do not need to show ID to vote, unless they did not provide identification with their registration.
First time voters must provide identification either on or with their voter registration application.
So *maybe* you had to show an ID because you did not provide identification with your registration, or you registered on voting day.
But that is not the same as an unequivocal, unqualified " ID IS required."
So who's the liar?
re: Guard's Patience RUNS OUT!
Posted by MidWestGuy on 10/31/25 at 10:01 pm to roguetiger15
quote:Yes. Very odd how that arm goes out, and where did that spray can appear from?
AI
The real problem is, AI will get better, and it will be hard to tell. Please don't post w/o a link to something credible.
re: Kamala on Losing to Trump: "We need 200k more votes that we can't find"
Posted by MidWestGuy on 10/31/25 at 2:04 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I think she meant 2,000,000.
Yea, PA and GA are 235K, WI + MI are about another 100K, plus anther 3 states...
re: JD Vance: 'My job as Vice President is to look out for the people of the United States'
Posted by MidWestGuy on 10/30/25 at 9:21 am to el Gaucho
quote:
Nobody in America is qualified to teach college
OK, start a new thread on whether we should have allowed immigrants in to teach college in the 1980's. Maybe not, but...
that has absolutely nothing to do with whether they were here legally, and whether Usha Vance is an American.
I'm so tired of this shtick - you leftists are proven wrong, and rather than admit it, you change the subject, move the goal posts. So predictable.
re: JD Vance: 'My job as Vice President is to look out for the people of the United States'
Posted by MidWestGuy on 10/30/25 at 9:18 am to YumYum Sauce
quote:
If you think the deck was stacked against Trump in his debates... wait til Vance gets up there.
Won't matter. Might even be good if they try - he will expose them, take their stacked deck, and beat them over the head with it. With a large audience to take it all in.
Remember his retorts to Martha Raddatz? "Do you hear yourself Martha? 'Only handfuls' of apartments were overrun by immigrant gangs?"
Or to Margaret Brennan: " I don’t really care, Margaret. "
re: JD Vance: 'My job as Vice President is to look out for the people of the United States'
Posted by MidWestGuy on 10/30/25 at 9:10 am to el Gaucho
quote:
If he loves Americans so much why didn’t he marry one
He did. She is an American citizen, born to parents who were here legally, for years before she was born.
I'm not sure her parents (professors at San Diego UCSD and SDSU), and ever applied for citizenship, but they are obviously here legally, or the MSM would have been all over that.
LINK
re: JD Vance: 'My job as Vice President is to look out for the people of the United States'
Posted by MidWestGuy on 10/30/25 at 8:56 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
JD would mop the floor against Gav in a debate
JD would mop the floor against any of the Dem nominees in a debate. I also can't wait to see it. Definitely will require a big bowl of popcorn.
Popular
1











