- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:25 pm to FLTech
quote:
I’m not 100% sold in it
Nothing gets past you...some people on this board need to get out into the real world and stop living your lives online listening to grifters trying to make money off your attention
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:27 pm to 3down10
quote:
It's more than possible to do such a thing.
No commercial/non military drone, can do this.
Drones are extremely light weight, that's what makes them so maneuverable. Any addition of weight must be offset by thrust, which means more power, which means faster motors, larger blade diameter, etc... Consider a .30-06 weights appx 15-25 lbs, depending on the gun. That is a lot of added weight for a drone that isn't military. In addition, there needs to be some sort of stabilization for the gun. The recoil alone will make an accurate shot impossible. Again, you'd need a much larger drone with specialized equipment and fittings to be able to fire.
Then, no one saw or heard a drone anywhere near there. So you now have military grade drone with new tech, and sound and sight masking capabilities. So it's either a high tech, well planned and coordinated military action.....or, it's the guy and gun and position where he was at that shot Kirk. You tell me what is more likely.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:29 pm to tigerinexile
quote:
Probably a better chance of this than the queer guy acting alone
No it’s not and you are retarded.
The fricking ring doorbell camera caught the guy earlier scoping the spot out.
Then caught him again limping with pants on because the rifle was down his pants.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:33 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
No, but I have seen just about any other theory which is more believable than the kid on the roof doing it.
Oh yeah? Which ones?
Lay them out.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:36 pm to JYD
quote:
They suggest the bullets did not originate solely from Paddock's room,
But shots did come from his room. It just wasn’t him.
Yeah okay.
More grifting.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:40 pm to Clames
I said that I wasn’t sold on it you dumbfrick.. it just seemed that was yesterday’s talking point on the podcast shows.. so explain to me again how I am a special kind of stupid for asking a question about what people are reporting as news
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:40 pm to BugAC
quote:
No commercial/non military drone, can do this.
Drones are extremely light weight, that's what makes them so maneuverable. Any addition of weight must be offset by thrust, which means more power, which means faster motors, larger blade diameter, etc... Consider a .30-06 weights appx 15-25 lbs, depending on the gun. That is a lot of added weight for a drone that isn't military. In addition, there needs to be some sort of stabilization for the gun. The recoil alone will make an accurate shot impossible. Again, you'd need a much larger drone with specialized equipment and fittings to be able to fire.
Then, no one saw or heard a drone anywhere near there. So you now have military grade drone with new tech, and sound and sight masking capabilities. So it's either a high tech, well planned and coordinated military action.....or, it's the guy and gun and position where he was at that shot Kirk. You tell me what is more likely.
/sigh
US firm reveals gun-toting drone that can fire in mid-air
quote:
The Tikad drone, developed by Duke Robotics, is armed with a machine-gun and a grenade launcher.
The gun can be fired only by remote control, and is designed to reduce military casualties by cutting the number of ground troops required.
But campaigners warn that in the wrong hands, it will make it easier to kill innocent people.
The Tikad drone, available for private sale at an undisclosed price, has won a security innovation award from the US Department of Defense, and there is interest from several military forces around the world, including Israel, reports Defense One.
According to the firm's website, two of the three co-founders of Duke Robotics worked for the Israel Defense Forces and the third at Israel Aerospace Industries.
That article was from 2017.
But once again, I seriously doubt this is what happened.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:41 pm to Snipe
quote:
some kind of conspiracy theory mind rot
It's called populism.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:41 pm to FLTech
Elvis and Jim Morrison are both still alive, participating in experiments with aliens at Area 51.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:43 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
its believable that they would not want people to know that drones were used as an assassination method.
Oh?
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:44 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
No, but I have seen just about any other theory which is more believable than the kid on the roof doing it.
Car with the trunk popping open in the tunnel was suspect, along with a shite ton of other things that people have found. Personally, I do not believe what we saw was an exit wound from a 30.06.
To believe the official narrative is pure naivety.
I know that correlation does not equal causation, but am I the only one who notices how many of these type posts are made by people with uat avatars by their names?
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:48 pm to 3down10
quote:
The Tikad drone, developed by Duke Robotics, is armed with a machine-gun and a grenade launcher.
1) Proving my point, would have to be a very high tech drone.
2) A machine gun makes sense. Not a large caliber rifle like a .30-06. Firing a single bullet with accuracy and precision. Those drones don't exist yet, unless the military has them. Which the technology to be able to fire essentially, a sniper shot. Spray and pray with a machine gun/mini gun type, i can see. You need volume, not precision.
quote:
But once again, I seriously doubt this is what happened.
There isn't even a doubt. It DID NOT HAPPEN.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:49 pm to BugAC
quote:
No commercial/non military drone, can do this.
The video i posted on Page 2 details the theory in much detail that this may have been a military drone strike. Not saying i believe it. Just putting the info out there.
Here's another one. They're pretty entertaining at least.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:52 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
No, but I have seen just about any other theory which is more believable than the kid on the roof doing it.
Car with the trunk popping open in the tunnel was suspect, along with a shite ton of other things that people have found. Personally, I do not believe what we saw was an exit wound from a 30.06.
To believe the official narrative is pure naivety.
The main reason I think it was probably some fricked up person on a roof doing it is because Charlie Kirk isn't the president with secret service protection. If you are some organization or foreign country and you want to kill the guy, you don't need to wait for a public event to do it. You can easily cover it up as a robbery, suicide or something else.
There is no need for crazy shite. He was not a difficult target.
However, if you're some fricked up dude, then you just hear about an event and you'll know the guy will be there. And you're familiar with the area and such, you can maybe take a shot from a distance and try to get away with it.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:57 pm to FLTech
The absence of credible and trustworthy news media and true journalistic investigative reporting in this country has put the Conspiracy Theory Era on steroids.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 1:00 pm to BugAC
quote:
1) Proving my point, would have to be a very high tech drone.
2) A machine gun makes sense. Not a large caliber rifle like a .30-06. Firing a single bullet with accuracy and precision. Those drones don't exist yet, unless the military has them. Which the technology to be able to fire essentially, a sniper shot. Spray and pray with a machine gun/mini gun type, i can see. You need volume, not precision.
It's not really all that high tech though. Again, these are all basic things, the only thing that is different is the platform. It's just a combination of technology that has existed for a long time.
The reason I doubt it is because it's just completely not needed. Charlie was not a difficult target to get too, far from it. But to say such a thing is impossible for a drone isn't correct.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 1:02 pm to FLTech
quote:
Charlie Kirk was shot by a drone?
I saw a video last night on YouTube showing what is claimed to be a bigfoot/rougaroux hybrid.
But I didn't start a thread about it.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 1:03 pm to goatmilker
quote:
No. They migrate here from other States
No doubt. The dude who said that has probably never been outside of Louisiana lmao
Posted on 10/16/25 at 1:04 pm to FLTech
quote:
Charlie Kirk was shot by a drone?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News