- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Celina Midelfart might be what Trump is embarrassed about in relation to Epstein
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:29 am to Great Plains Drifter
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:29 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
The Democratic Party and aligned Never-Trumpers have come up with every scenario imaginable since 2016 to rid themselves of DJT and MAGA.
TDS conservatives are useful idiots for the left. They can't help themselves. They are so much purer than Trump that they have to work with the party of trannies and abortion to defeat him.
Yes, the "principled" ones have no problem working with democrats to bring down the man they "voted for 3 times." That tells you all you need to know about their principles.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:33 am to theunknownknight
quote:TBH, they seem to have realized they were dealing with a massive volume of information, court-ordered protections, pending cases, and so they over-redacted out of an abundance of caution. Even so, they missed things.
Why did they redact the name and photo?
The unredacted private release to Congress should have been the plan from Day 1.
The rationale was certainly not to protect Trump from information that has been in the public domain for 30-35yrs.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:02 am to theunknownknight
I don't think he was embarrassed about slaying world-class poon on the reg. The guy literally built his entire image upon that. 
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:06 am to WylieTiger
quote:
Trump was a playboy.
yawn.
He's paying for his lack of moral compass. He associated with some scummy people in the chase for the almighty undefeated.
I miss the days of Presidents who weren't secretly gay (Obama), a child sniffer (Biden) or out and out poon hounds (Clinton/Trump)
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:13 am to theunknownknight
I'm team Trump, retard
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:14 am to theunknownknight
quote:You just happened to stumble across this while strolling through the internet?
I found the SAME email chain as above, but a more complete version that is not in the file dump
The DOJ drops millions of files collected by hundreds of agents over decades of observations… but your awesome investigative prowess allows you to be able to dig up one that is more complete than anything they have/release?
Count me as skeptical
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:15 am to funnystuff
Count me as skeptical
no no he's team Trump baby. He said so right in his post.
No really, team trump. It's just you and the cult that don't get it.
Plus....... wait for it........ this time he's really got him!!
no no he's team Trump baby. He said so right in his post.
No really, team trump. It's just you and the cult that don't get it.
Plus....... wait for it........ this time he's really got him!!
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:22 am to theunknownknight
Anything that addresses a name like "Midelfart" has to be taken as a tongue-in-cheek joke unless specifically discounted in the lead-in to the statement.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:23 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
pending cases
Why are they "pending cases" almost a decade later?
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:33 am to theunknownknight
Regardless of how credible you find the Trump allegations it’s obvious that the cover up is still happening. Just as it was under Biden. The left will obviously try to weaponize this but are wrong to do so. It transcends political alignment.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 11:00 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Clearly people can’t read
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 11:36 am
Posted on 2/13/26 at 11:38 am to theunknownknight
quote:
theunknownknight
I think you can request a name change on the Help Board
Sometimes its just best to start over, after an OP like this. Eskimo brothers? Thats the best you can do? Wanna fo the same for the likes of JFK, Clinton, Obama?
This is like so embarrassing for you
If I may, suggest a new user name, "theiknownothingknight"
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 11:43 am
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nothing except some potential dirt on Prince Andrew (which wasn't ever specifically established).
The royal family begs to differ.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:09 pm to BBONDS25
Again - you can’t read well
I specifically said in the OP he didn’t diddle kids or the like
My entire premise is he and Epstein were Pussy bros in the 90s. I cited actual DOJ documents.
And I am sure he regrets his association with him because of what Epstein was exposed to be years later.
I specifically said in the OP he didn’t diddle kids or the like
My entire premise is he and Epstein were Pussy bros in the 90s. I cited actual DOJ documents.
And I am sure he regrets his association with him because of what Epstein was exposed to be years later.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:10 pm to RobbBobb
You ok? No need to melt bro.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:10 pm to Flats
quote:
The royal family begs to differ.
The witch hunt the past few weeks begs to differ with your point.
Tons of people who clearly have no evidence of illegality are becoming sacrifices simply for associating with Epstein. Look at the link I've provided a few times ITT to the former Obama counsel who just resigned from Goldman Sachs for an example.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yep.
Tons of people who clearly have no evidence of illegality are becoming sacrifices simply for associating with Epstein. Look at the link I've provided a few times ITT to the former Obama counsel who just resigned from Goldman Sachs for an example.
That was always the concern.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The witch hunt the past few weeks begs to differ with your point.
It has nothing to do with my point at all. My point is that the girls weren’t all just for Epstein. Andrew proves that, so you constantly ignore or attempt to minimize his involvement.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:18 pm to Flats
quote:
My point is that the girls weren’t all just for Epstein. Andrew proves that
The thing is, it doesn't. There isn't clear evidence of what exactly Andrew did, and the Royal family treating him like Goldman Sachs did the former Obama counsel doesn't mean anything.
*ETA: and if you get past Andrew, there is basically nothing for anyone else.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There isn't clear evidence of what exactly Andrew did, and the Royal family treating him like Goldman Sachs did the former Obama counsel doesn't mean anything.
Ok.
Popular
Back to top



0









