- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can any leftists actually defend the nature of this 01/06 committee?
Posted on 7/28/21 at 10:35 am
Posted on 7/28/21 at 10:35 am
Not whether you believe there should be a committee or not, and if you have strong opinions on what happened at the Capitol.
But can you actually defend this as being a bi-partisan truth finding effort? Do you believe there is opportunity for the other side to present alternative facts or ask questions of the witnesses?
Does that make you feel good? That your congress does not believe in presenting other viewpoints in something you consider to be such a terrible event in American history? Does this bring any shame to you?
But can you actually defend this as being a bi-partisan truth finding effort? Do you believe there is opportunity for the other side to present alternative facts or ask questions of the witnesses?
Does that make you feel good? That your congress does not believe in presenting other viewpoints in something you consider to be such a terrible event in American history? Does this bring any shame to you?
13
Posted on 7/28/21 at 10:37 am to burger bearcat
What do you think...The person in charge of funding security and making sure the capitol is safe is running the "committee". The whole thing is a joke. They will keep thumping Orange Man bad because they are screwing up our country and don't have any legit talking points.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 10:38 am to burger bearcat
It's just a political exercise to generate sound bites for 2022 midterm races.
... and another failing, flailing attempt to lay this at Trump's feet.
... and another failing, flailing attempt to lay this at Trump's feet.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 10:41 am to burger bearcat
Rent free.
4+ years and counting.
4+ years and counting.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 10:54 am to burger bearcat
They don't have to, so why should they.
This post was edited on 7/28/21 at 10:54 am
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:00 am to burger bearcat
I was impressed with AQUILINO GONELL. His testimony was crap. But his name sounds like a large hydroelectric damn project.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:02 am to burger bearcat
Same old song and dance since Trump took office.
Every "committee" they have put together has circumvented every procedural rule to get the outcome they wanted from the getgo.
Every "committee" they have put together has circumvented every procedural rule to get the outcome they wanted from the getgo.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:08 am to burger bearcat
quote:"alternative facts"??? Do you even listen to yourself?
Not whether you believe there should be a committee or not, and if you have strong opinions on what happened at the Capitol.
But can you actually defend this as being a bi-partisan truth finding effort? Do you believe there is opportunity for the other side to present alternative facts or ask questions of the witnesses?
Does that make you feel good? That your congress does not believe in presenting other viewpoints in something you consider to be such a terrible event in American history? Does this bring any shame to you?
There was a truly bipartisan committee offered that Republicans sabotaged. The current committee is bipartisan and the only reason there aren't 6 Republicans on it is because McCarthy is playing games.
McCarthy could still nominate 4 serious Republicans to the committee if he wanted to.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:09 am to burger bearcat
It's being run by the same Lawfare crew that ran the Blasey-Ford "Beach Friends" hearing.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:09 am to burger bearcat
Duhh.. it's bipartisan!
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:10 am to mmcgrath
He could do that and the whole thing would still be a sham.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:10 am to mmcgrath
quote:
There was a truly bipartisan committee offered that Republicans sabotaged. The current committee is bipartisan and the only reason there aren't 6 Republicans on it is because McCarthy is playing games.
This guy. Sure thing buddy. We are going to listen to a leftist explain "the truth".
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:13 am to mmcgrath
quote:
4 serious Republicans
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:15 am to burger bearcat
quote:
alternative facts
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:16 am to burger bearcat
They are all the same in DC. Don't get fooled.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:17 am to mmcgrath
quote:
McCarthy could still nominate 4 serious Republicans to the committee if he wanted to.
And Pelosi would reject them again.
You're a clown.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:26 am to burger bearcat
It's complete shite and waste of time just like all theatrical performances created by Democrats. Only the "true believers" are getting lathered up over this farcical dog and pony show.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 11:52 am to mmcgrath
quote:
the only reason there aren't 6 Republicans on it is because McCarthy is playing games.
Playing games? Ok. Why is the attack on the White House the night Trump was evacuated to the bunker not being investigated in this committee? The ambush and threats of Republicans leaving the RNC in Washington?
Sorry to make you try to defend the indefensible. But you are a lib.. so you have practice.
This post was edited on 7/28/21 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 7/28/21 at 8:30 pm to BugAC
quote:
This guy. Sure thing buddy. We are going to listen to a leftist explain "the truth"
This thread asked him to give his opinion.
Absolute joke you are.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News