nonu121

quote:

---

The fact they believe it’s necessary to convince the public that he’s actually doing something is a bit concerning

---

This is the exact kind of thing Trump did (although the guy sure did golf a lot).

Every president in the social media age will do this kind of thing.

My point was that facebook likes are meaningless.

I don't follow Biden nor do I worship Biden like you guys do for Trump.

Most Biden voters voted for Biden because he was against Trump. I'd vote for him again in a heart beat if Trump was running in 2024.

That doesn't mean I'd attend a Biden rally nor would I like/share stuff on facebook.

quote:

---

Yes they do. Much like you're doing right here and now, and at a fairly decent clip since your registration date of 7/21/21.

---

Yes, but some of us have to work you know. Cities don't subsidize rural areas for no reason. Someone has to pay taxes to subsidize you guys.

We may post on the internet but that's in between breaks. Higher-income voters (voters making over $100K a year) voted for the Democrats by over 13 percentage points this election. Like I said, we're paying for everyone else :lol:

Pew Research Voter Breakdown

quote:

---

Nonu is a China shill who is very happy to have cheap shite made for him by slave labor.

---

We've been over this.

It's not slave labor. Those workers willingly work for low costs because the cost of living is much lower in China.

Those workers would be grateful for the economic opportunities manufacturing has given them. It's better than working on a Chinese farm in any case so I'm actually doing them a favor.

I make no claims about the morality of anything or being a particularly moral person. I could care less.

quote:

---

Right. Surely, the food supplies integral to survival in urban areas will just start being grown in inner city gardens that will be ample enough for these densely populated areas. You are a moron if you think “economy” matters when supplies are non-existent.

---

It's why import-export exists.

We can simply import food from other countries if there ever was a need. There are storage technologies that allow us to store crops for large periods of time.

It's not as cost-effective to do so but costs will be a minor concern if food supply was cut off. Many blue-areas are near ports/the coast which facilitates import-export.

Blue areas/cities also disproportionately have the research institutes, scientists, physicians, and economic resources.

The economy matters because the size of the economy determines the ease by which new supply chains can be set up.

In many European countries, they have to import food goods. In the US, it makes no sense but it could easily be done if it got to that point.

Like we would need to visit those red counties.

Most economic activity happens in the blue areas.

:lol:

quote:

---

Where did all these new clueless inbreds come from? They’re saturating this board

---

Says the inbred who doesn't realize the film isn't playing in China so it doesn't matter what China thinks about LeBron James.

It's about the rest of the world excluding China. LeBron isn't really that big in Europe for example. Plus, you're mistaking a vocal Chinese fanbase for a very large one.

Most Chinese people could care less about LeBron James. Heck, most Western people probably could. My parents don't care or watch Basketball so they're not really fans of LeBron James.

That doesn't mean he's that popular at all.

He doesn't have same strength of support that Michael Jordan did in the 1990s. Nobody I know goes crazy over LeBron James as a young person myself.

Plus, not that many people watch Basketball outside of the US. Basketball and American football viewership numbers are much lower outside of the US compared with soccer.

China really isn't communist anymore.

Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in the 1980s and 1990s led to a period of economic liberalization, much more akin to a free market these days.

They got rid of their fixed pricing system under those reforms and companies have a pricing system based on demand/supply rather than the state setting values. Companies are allowed to make a profit and produce what the market demands, which wouldn't have happened under a communist system.

So your logic relies on China being communist when any economist or economic historian would tell you that China really doesn't operate on a communist system anymore.

quote:

---

The American Elite/politicians are NOT Marxists and/or communists because they are influenced by, and get legislative direction from, corporate lobbyists; the same lobbyists who work for corporations that have their means of production located in Communist China, generate a significant portion of their revenues from Communist China, and in many cases are outright owned by investment groups operating out of Communist China?

---

Let's break this down.

1) China really isn't communist and hasn't been since Deng's famous reforms in the 1980s.

2) Corporate lobbyists would lobby for *capitalism* and the fact that large foreign corporations can operate in China shows how much Deng's reforms have changed the way the country works.

3) American elite/politicians are not communist. At worst, you could argue that some politicians support social democracy but that's not the same thing as communism.

Do you really understand what communism is because you've described things that wouldn't really happen under a communist system?

Large foreign corporations making a profit is a feature of a capitalist system, not a communist one.

Interesting.

quote:

---

Here you go. Here's how most Americans feel about your "insurrection".
Daily Wire LINK

---

It's a Rasmussen poll (and I called it before I even clicked the link).

They're notoriously bad at polling because they massage their data to suit their narrative.

It's so predictable at this point. In the polling industry, Rasmussen isn't considered reliable at all.

:lol:

Give me a YouGov poll or something from a more reliable polling firm, not Rasmussen.